Cable follows The Staggers and cites Adam Smith
Business Secretary adds reference to economist as suggested by the New Statesman.
By George Eaton Published 22 September 2010 14:31
In my blog this morning, I suggested that Vince Cable's criticisms of capitalism owed more to Adam Smith than they did to Karl Marx.
Smith, the apostle of the free market, noted, for instance, that "the interest of the dealers in any particular branch and trade or manufactures, is always in some respects different from and even opposite to, that of the public".
So I was pleased to see the Business Secretary follow my lead and insert a reference to the Scottish economist into his rapturously received conference speech today.
The text issued last night read:
Why do directors forget their wider duties when a fat cheque is waved before them? Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can.
But the version delivered by Cable this lunchtime read:
Why do directors sometimes forget their wider duties when a cheque is waved before them? Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can, as Adam Smith explained over 200 years ago.
Perhaps Vince read The Staggers over breakfast this morning?
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















2 comments
Lets hope so! Unless he is fond of reading 18th Century texts - in which case Vince, I recommend "The Rights of Man" by Thomas Paine for starters...
http://clemthegem.labourhome.org/
One has to admit that Mr Cable can certainly, Talk the Talk,but will the ConDems follow up and Walk the Walk.
I for one would applaud them if they succeed but I strongly suspect much blood maybe spilt in the trying and with very little reward in the end.
You can almost hear the siren voices already. "Legislation and new rules are anti competative","We will move abraod","We will find different ways in order that we can carry on as usual" or "Our accountants will deal with this irritation"
Words are very cheap Mr.Cable