The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

WikiLeaks founder accused of rape

Swedish police issue then retract arrest warrant, as Julian Assange warns of “dirty tricks” campaign

The BBC reports that an arrest warrant has been issued in Sweden for the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, on charges of "rape and molestation". Assange was in the country last week to talk about his work with the whistleblowing website.

Last month, WikiLeaks published more than 90,000 secret US military documents relating to the war in Afghanistan, many of which detailed civilian deaths and targeted assassinations. As John Pilger reported in his recent NS column, US officials have vowed to hunt down Assange and discredit his organisation in revenge for publishing the documents:

In Washington, I interviewed a senior official in the defence department and asked: "Can you give a guarantee that the editors of WikiLeaks and the editor-in-chief, who is not American, will not be subjected to the kind of manhunt that we read about in the media?" He replied: "It's not my position to give guarantees on anything."

[. . .]

A Pentagon document states bluntly that US intelligence intends to "fatally marginalise" WikiLeaks. The preferred tactic is smear, with corporate journalists ever ready to play their part.

So far, little information about the rape allegations, which were made in the Swedish tabloid Expressen, has emerged. Assange, communicating via the WikiLeaks Twitter feed, said he had been warned of a "dirty tricks" campaign.

In another message, he said: "the charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing." Assange had recently signed up as a star columnist with the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet, which has now suspended the arrangement.

The legal blogger Jack of Kent makes the point that scepticism about the timing of the allegations does not mean that any rape complainant should automatically be branded a "liar":

The better response to this emerging news is not to jettison our liberal value of taking allegations of rape seriously and treating the alleged victim with appropriate respect.

[. . .]

The defendant should now have the presumption of innocence until proved guilty; and during this process, assumptions about culpability and credibility, either of the defendant or the alleged victim, should not be too readily made by the rest of us.

UPDATE: The Swedish Prosecution Authority has now cancelled the arrest warrant. According to the BBC: "The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said the chief prosecutor had come to the decision that Mr Assange was not suspected of rape but did not give any further explanation."

37 comments

writeoff's picture

They'll get him sooner or later. Car accident, falling out of a window. There's even a verb for it in Italian 'to be suicided'.

thinkov's picture

Start of a sinister campaign from Swedens dark underbelly?

Hopefully the smear will exonerate him

paul gallagher's picture

didn't take long for john pilger's predictions on a smear campaign to come true. have a look at his recent article.

Forlornehope's picture

You would think that they would be a little bit more subtle. Then perhaps Jeremy Clarkson was right - Americans have started interbreeding with vegetables.

Clem the Gem's picture

Just because we would like it to be so, does not make it so.
Back in the 70s a vile man called Gerry Healy had some jolly good comrades in his little Workers revolutionary Party, and liked to bully women into sleeping with him "for the cause". "Capitalist lies!" Shouted the Redgraves and their fellow travellers.
Turns out they were not lies.
What In am advocating is caution.

Karl Held's picture

The Americans have no desire (or, as they see it: need) to be "subtle". Their intent is clear and stated. Obscuring their activity behind subtlety would be counter-productive.

ashleyhk's picture

"The preferred tactic is smear, with corporate journalists ever ready to play their part"
Evidence for this assertion, please.
Pilger is a purveyor of lies, distortions and half-truths so , I guess, he has some inside track.

ashleyhk's picture

Sorry.
Also , which Pentagon document is he referring to? Show it to us

Lafutiere's picture

Any woman can accuse any man of rape. If her story is even slightly plausible, the authorities are oblidged to respond. As the accuser is rarely expected to reveal her identity, it's an incredibly simple and effective method of character assasination.

EdWelthorpe's picture

Women don't accuse men of rape for no reason. Every feminist knows that!

I didn't realise Wikileaks had got into bed with that hideous right wing car boot sale, the Pirate Party. Yuk.

ashleyhk's picture

Any woman can accuse a man of rape.
That's a good one coming from someone who ( I may be wrong) is on the left and a feminist, at least in principle. Tying yourself up in knots.

Robert Wilson's picture

Why does the New Statesman report the rape reports on twitter and then immediately follow up by reminding people of Pilger's piece?

Let's push this paranoid nonsense aside and wait for the legal proceedings.

Lou's picture

The Prosecution has apparently cancelled the arrest warrant according to breaking news from AFP.

Faex Populi's picture

I'm surprised they didn't accuse him of being a paedophile, now that's a way to destroy a reputation. Thankfully Wikileaks will continue to do the work that journalist's should be doing.

PDF's picture

If I were an investigative journalist, I'd look into Lavely and Singer. They did the same thing for their client, Tig Notaro. If you can't get them to stop telling the truth- accuse them of crimes and let the police take care of them.

EdWelthorpe's picture

The state backs down and refuses to prosecute rape. Rien ne change.

William's picture

The only thing that surprises me is how blunderingly incompetent the security forces are. Day one, Assange humiliates the CIA, day two, the CIA puts out a press release 'we're comming to get you', day three, Assange is accused of rape. Surely they understood that everyone would see through this?

But then, they didn't they realise that only a complete fool would think Saddam Hussein had missiles capible of hitting the UK in 45 minutes (a feat not even Russia can manage)? Didn't they realize that claiming that Dr Kelly slit his wrists, when there was no blood at the scene was stupid? Or when they willfully mistranslated Chirac's comments about the united nations resolution; didn't they realize some people actally can speak french, and could tell that the subtitles where off by a mile?

It's just like tony ben said; the security forces are a bunch of none too bright, inbred public schoolboys (Yale boys in america) with out a clue about the real world, and with no supervision of their activities. Any wonder that they continually blunder?

Jean's picture

Smells like classic "dirty tricks".

William's picture

EdWelthorpe
21 August 2010 at 15:47

"I didn't realise Wikileaks had got into bed with that hideous right wing car boot sale, the Pirate Party. Yuk."

As usual Ed, your comments are so stupid as to actually laugh-out-lould funny. Julian Assange is not right wing or associated with right-wing parties. He is -famously- associated with a the Swedish Social Democrat Party. (That's a leftwing party, fyi coz, i know you know nothing about the world outside your padded cell)

He writes a leftwing column in a leftwing paper.And attends SDP confrences.

As for your bizarre claim that the Pirate Party is a 'hideous right wing car boot sale'...

*sigh* I'll go very slowly for you and explain all the big words:

The Pirate Party is a group of people that try to win elections (they're like contests). Each party has policies (things that it will be alowed to do if it can win the contest) The Pirate Party's central policy is ending intellectual property rights. Property means being able to enjoy things privately, and not letting johnny play. Intellectual is a big word that means, to do with thoughts and ideas.

The 'left wing' refers to people influenced by a man called Karl Marx, he lived a long time ago and had a beard. Karl Marx had many ideas, but the most important idea he had was that 'private property' was unecessary, and 'property rights' where bad things. He also believed that 'intellectual property rights' where meaningless metaphysical abstractions from material reality used to oppress the people. That means that they are lies made up by bad people to steal wealth from everybody else.

Now, when people say that their party believes in not having property rights anymore, then those people are agreeing with Karl Marx, and that means that they are considered to be LeftWing; and being LeftWing means being the opposite of being RightWing.

Offically the Pirate Party is part of the Green's and Free Alliance.

thinkov's picture

william you're welcome to talk to me like that as well

now I understand what i've been following all these years

Glad I guessed right

Dave C's picture

Further to Lou above

BBc: "Swedish rape warrant for Wikileaks' Assange cancelled"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316

jupb's picture

I'd bet that the woman making the false accusation are named Stefanie Willen and Mathilde Notaro, and that the law firm, Lavely and Singer, is involved. This is their M.O.

EdWelthorpe's picture

William

(Ex-Moderate Youth League's) Rickard Falkvinge's Pirate Party are rightwing "libertarians" with none of the Proudhon-style rejection of private property you seem so keen on! They are IT entrepreneurs, the Oil Men of the digital desert, the next generation of Richard Bransons, who want to right to make money distributing ripped off digital files. They believe that the consumer's right to steal is more important than the worker's right to be paid. They reject that people should be paid for work - something we associate with the Pharaohs or the factories of Birkenau - certainly not with socialism. The free flow of work by creators who permit it takes place anywhere and everywhere on the internet - there is no restraint, if it is mutual. But the Pirate Party believe in the right to steal ALL material even by workers trying to be professional. They want everyone at the IT tier to make money and everyone at the creative tier to starve. How on earth is that of the "left"?

triedeinsursE's picture

There’s no way that vermin raped anyone. He only has one decent fuk holding him together.

EdWelthorpe's picture

I suspect that because this man has high-powered friends the police are backing down from advancing these women's allegations, and making the case too "sensitive" to take further.

jupb - it doesn't matter where a woman works, or how short her skirt is, a man has no right to rape her. It doesn't matter if her name is Honey H Trap - rape is wrong.

EdWelthorpe's picture

Of course, it's all thanks to the U-turn on rape anonymity that we can actually read about this brute. Thanks, Yvette, Louise etc!

dtyjhhjetj's picture

Lol @ EdWelthorpe. Yes, its obviously Assange who has the powerful friends and had been pulling a few strings with the Swedish police.
This couldn't possibly be a very blunt attempt at a smear could it? By someone who'd like to shut him up? Of course not.

dtyjhhjetj's picture

EdWelthorpe, not only has this "brute" not been found guilty of anything as far as I know, but it also seems that you're the only person accusing him.
The Swedes seem not to be anyway. Still, what a brute, eh?

EdWelthorpe's picture

Tony

Of course he is unproven, but Caroline Flint and the anti-anonymity warriors don't care. They want every brute, EVEN the ones who didn't do it, to be a disgraced warning to would-bes.

The two women who visited Stockholm City Police are the only ones who can accuse anything, however their case has been mysteriously dropped. Pressure in the "boys network" I suspect. Phonecalls.

jie4v7i14's picture

ah well. These things will happen.

Nice to see the modern communication age resulted in that there was nothing in it. Basic mobile phone records no doubt, no matter how much certain people were trying to manipulate them to possibly show he was actually there in that point and place in time.

Keeps them in a job, I suppose. Did someone say sandman?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WUUnc1M0TA

skiptonman's picture

It is surely in the publics interest that a full public inquiry into this serious allegation is held by an international independant body, Mr Mansfield QC or his like to chair, if this woman was raped lets catch the culprit, if not why the allegation ...

Clem the Gem's picture

It seems to me that Jack of Kent has got this right. Rape is not an issue to be to be swept under the carpet.
You cannot judge this on the basis of political expedience.
It is not beyond the bounds of possibility that this is part of a smear campaign, but we should wait until things become clearer through official investigation - remember the awful, sadistic Gerry Healy.

lcal's picture

======= http://clothesmall.org =========

Best regards for you all,

Looking forward to your visiting.

========= http://clothesmall.org =========

Viewing from afar's picture

It seems William is one of the few people making any kind of sense in the above posts - thank you William for your clarity, maybe the others need to get back to the intellectual stimulus of 'big brother'

Viewing from afar's picture

apologies to writeoff, thandi and tony et al. who are not so quick to jump to conclusions

dtyjhhjetj's picture

So Clem, let me try and get this right. Despite Assange not being charged (or apparently investigated) for anything at the moment, we should consider him slightly guilty of rape at the moment, just to be on the safe side?
Rape is indeed a very serious offence, and one that we should take seriously. But innocent until proven guilty, eh?
(and yes, Assange is probably being investigated constantly at the moment, but only because of the website that he started).

Thandi's picture

If Wikileaks were warned of "Dirty Tricks" which would include sexual "set-ups", surely Julian Assange wouldn't go out and rape 2 women subsequent to the warning?

Latest tweets