The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Ed Balls declares: Labour’s cuts would have been too savage

Balls is right. Labour’s spending plans would have meant cuts of 20 per cent.

The coalition may be planning to cut all non-ring-fenced budgets by 25 per cent but it's worth remembering that Labour's cuts wouldn't have been much less savage. The Brown/Darling pledge to halve the deficit by 2014 would have seen cuts of 20 per cent to all non-protected departments.

So Ed Balls's declaration that this promise was a mistake deserves to be taken seriously. It's a more credible position than those campaigning against "Tory cuts" while refusing to accept that this means a slower pace of deficit reduction.

Balls told the BBC:

I always accepted collective responsibility but at the time, in 2009, I thought the pace of deficit reduction through spending cuts was not deliverable, I didn't think it could have been done.

This leaves open the possibility of a more even split between spending cuts and tax rises (George Osborne currently envisages a 77:23 ratio, Darling favoured 67:33). After all, during the last big fiscal tightening undertaken by a Conservative government, Ken Clarke split the pain 50:50 between tax rises and spending cuts. But Balls goes on to suggest that major cuts shouldn't take place until the economy has recovered fully:

We'll have to wait and see where we are once this huge risky experiment has been tried on our economy by the Conservatives and the Liberals. I can't start pre-empting how things will be in a few years' time but, you know, in my department I set out a third of a billion pounds of cuts, so obviously I'm not unafraid to make difficult decisions.

With confirmation today that growth in the first quarter of this year was just 0.3 per cent, the cautionary principle suggests that dramatic cuts should not take place until the economy is out of intensive care.

Balls, like some of his rivals for the Labour leadership, has belatedly adopted a clear line on the deficit. David Miliband has let it be known that he still supports the original pledge to halve the deifict by 2014, while Andy Burnham has come out against the coalition's absurd pledge to ring-fence the £110bn NHS budget.

I've heard remarkably little from either Ed Miliband or Diane Abbott on the deficit, but perhaps Balls's move will stir them into life.

7 comments

Abby's picture

Pablo

25-40% cut in education, transport, policing & home office and defence budgets, 20% cut in NHS budget and a backdoor privatisation policy in discussion, cut in free school meals, 700 school building plans cancelled, 10,000 university placements cut, higher tuition fees, frozen child benefit, cut in child tax credit, disability living allowance and housing benefit, scrapping child trust fund, 20% vat, scrapping free swimming for under 16 and over 60. Apart from scrapping all targets, ID cards, widespread use of DNA and CCTV.

I did not recognise any of these from the election manisfestos of Tory and Libdem.

£2.5b bank levy, from 2011 (no levy in 2010).

It will certainly hurt some more than others!

pablo's picture

ABBY its the facts of life, it aint nice, but its time to pay the piper..

pablo's picture

does anybody take this idiot seriously, the economy is in the mire because of richard heads like him and his leftist morons, pablo

ang's picture

@Abby. You forgot a cut in corporation tax, which will negate the £2.5b bank levy. So the banks don't receive any punishment, even though the economic recession was their fault. Thanks for the list of utterly destructive things this coalition is imposing on the ordinary people of this country. Pablo you are wrong, the tories are common thieves and need to be stopped. David Miliband has always agreed with Alistair Darling, that to start cutting while the economy is so fragile, is completely the wrong thing to do.

Dave C's picture

Pablo,

Would you care to argue rather than just abuse? What rate of deficit reduction do you favour? What ratio between tax rises and spending cuts? 77:23? 67:33? 50:50? Those are issues being debated above.

pablo's picture

DAVE C
its going to hurt, but george osborne has got the right medicine. 77:23 ratio dont u agree

Dave C's picture

Dangers of having your ex tempore words quoted verbatim: ".. I'm not unafraid to make difficult decisions".

Presumable he meant: ".. I'm not afraid to make difficult decisions"

Latest tweets