What we’ve learned from Mandelson’s memoir
Which Lib Dems would have made it into Gordon Brown’s cabinet and why Tony Blair was unambiguously opposed to a Lab-Lib deal.
By George Eaton Published 12 July 2010 11:12
The "news" that Nick Clegg demanded Gordon Brown's head as the price of a Lab-Lib coalition will come as a surprise to almost no one, though it's the first time we've had this story confirmed by one of the negotiators.
But the Times's serialisation of Peter Mandelson's memoir The Third Man (an important test case for the paywall) still contains much of note. Top of the list is the revelation that Tony Blair was unambiguously opposed to a deal between the two parties.
According to Mandelson, Blair said: "There will be an outcry if we stay on . . . There's going to be another election, and we'll be smashed if we don't make the right judgements." He later warned that it would be a "constitutional outrage" for Labour to remain in office. Perhaps it's not surprising that Blair, who won three consecutive elections, was unsympathetic to calls for his party to cling on to power.
We also learn that Mandelson, an exceptionally perceptive politician, was one of the few Labour figures to recognise the significance of David Cameron's "big, comprehensive offer" to the Lib Dems:
I was almost alone in our ranks in being impressed. Gordon and his team told me they felt it was a mistaken show of weakness, given that the Tories had won the largest number of seats. To me, it sounded like the new politics. In the past, I had felt that Cameron was not bold enough about changing his party. But now he was acting boldly, and if he pulled off a deal with the Lib Dems the alliance would offer him a renewed prospect of delivering a changed perception of his party.
The growing evidence that Cameron views the coalition not as an alliance of convenience, but as a vehicle to realign British politics, suggests that this interpretation was right.
In a helpful bit of PR, it was also Mandelson who ordered Brown to stop referring to Nick Clegg's party as the "Liberals". "If you're serious perhaps you should stop calling them the Liberals and get their name right," he said.
Finally, we learn which Lib Dems would have made it into Brown's new cabinet. Mandelson writes: "He envisaged Nick being in charge of constitutional reform, Chris Huhne at Energy, David Laws at Culture, Media and Sport, and Paddy Ashdown as Defence Secretary." Vince Cable would have been given "an economic portfolio".
One of the ironies of all this is that it was Brown, in the early, hopeful days of his premiership, who first invited Lib Dems to join the cabinet.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















6 comments
And so says Peter Mandelson, brought to us via News International. It must all be true then.
Without hesitatin I say that the Lib Dems were absolutely right to enter into a Coalition Govt. That is what their aim and purpose has been for the past 60 years. Its pity it wasn't with Labour, but then, beggars can't be choosers.
Blair still cannot admit he was removed by his own party over Iraq?
As he in said huff post while referring to former politicians like him he says "some of us were removed by the electorate?
How many of us wait to see Blair at the Hague?
Reading this leads me to the conclusion that Blair never really let go of leadership of the labour party. And was quite prepared to sink the ship to make sure nobody else did either. What was that I said in a previous post? Oh yes! Professional suicide. It's not really the war that irritates me. Did Saddam murder millions of innocent people? It's that fact that this countries government lied about the nuclear weapons. Didn't deal with the problems in their own country, and this Robbie Williams attitude. No I'm afraid you won't be getting away with the jollies you've been having ripping off my music and trespassing on my human rights. You have your own issues to deal with, and I think you should do so publically. HAND YOURSELVES IN!
Blair should have gone in 2004, and kept to is side of the Ganita agreement. Also, the Wars were going terribly wrong and the Party should have asked him to step down then. And yet it took another 4 years to force him out. And quite rightly so. Brown made the mistake of not allowing a candidate to stand against him. The Left made the mistake of not putting forward a serious candidate.
The state Labour is in is down to both Blair and Brown.
Post new comment