Outsourcing law and order
US troops to come to Costa Rica as Laura Chinchilla, the country’s first ever female president, is f
By Samantha Eyler Reid Published 30 July 2010 17:39
When Laura Chinchilla won office in February, it seemed that the thorniest challenge facing Costa Rica's first-ever presidenta would be scraping together the funds for the crackdown on public security she had promised on the campaign trail. Two months later, the Costa Rican legislature voted to host up to 7,000 US marines for six months, solving Chinchilla's problem of delivering her law-and-order platform without emptying state coffers.
The controversial vote reauthorised the 1999 joint patrol between the US Coast Guard and Costa Rican police to fight narcotrafficking and provide so-called humanitarian support. Propped up by Chinchilla's centre-right PLN, the measure passed by a vote of 31-8 in spite of a walkout staged by six deputies attempting to break quorum and prevent the vote.
A week later the opposition PUSC party challenged the law's constitutionality in the Supreme Court. They argue that Costa Rica's constitution bans not just the establishment of a military, but also any occupation by foreign troops.
The US flotilla will include aircraft carriers, destroyers, fighter jets and nearly as many troops as Haiti received after the severest humanitarian crisis the region ever suffered (they will also stay in Costa Rica for longer). This year President Barack Obama signed agreements allowing US troops to occupy bases in Colombia and Panama.
The US government has not commented on Costa Rica's decision.
More perplexing than the motives behind US geopolitical posturing in the Caribbean is what Latin America's oldest, most proudly pacifist democracy hopes to gain from this partnership. Though Costa Rica remains one of the safest countries in Latin America, several recent high-profile cases of narcotrafficking have inflamed public fears that the drug violence plaguing its neighbours may prove contagious.
Last month, the Mexican authorities confirmed the identity of 14 suspects detained in Costa Rica as members of the Familia Michoacana, moving South American drugs through Costa Rica. Reports of local drug seizures fill the dailies and some residents complain of violence spreading in the underbelly of San José.
To an electorate worried about deteriorating law and order, Laura Chinchilla, Oscar Arias's vice-minister of public security from 1994, seemed like the perfect candidate. After her inauguration in May, she duly promised a crackdown on crime within her first 100 days in office, but the state's never-ending fiscal crisis ruled out investment in the inept police force.
Keen to remain a Latin American favourite of the IMF and international investors, Costa Rican politicians compete to outdo each other in their commitment to fiscal prudence, impairing the state's effectiveness. A recent World Bank report blames a lack of political consensus for the legislature's sluggishness in tackling rampant tax evasion, resulting in low tax revenue and "fiscal vulnerability". Lack of investment in infrastructure and social services threatens to undermine the country's development.
More than 60 days into Chinchilla's first 100, the Joint Patrol agreement seemed like the perfect escape from fiscal constraints. The wave of panic over drug violence that Chinchilla rode to victory two months ago has guaranteed widespread quiescence about the inflammatory decision.
"It's better to have US soldiers walking around the country than hitmen and drug traffickers," reasoned the anti-drugs commissioner Mauricio Boraschi.
The Joint Patrol gives the United States a disturbing space to pursue its geopolitical goals in Latin America. But the greater threat to Costa Rican sovereignty is a state so feeble and so preoccupied with fiscal discipline that it must continue to outsource its obligation to provide security for its citizens to its aggressive northern neighbour.
The danger of the Joint Patrol, like any drug problem, is that this political quick fix will develop into dependency.
Samantha Eyler Reid is a research associate for the North American Congress on Latin America and writes about Latin American and Hispanic American politics for nacla.org. She recently finished her MSc in comparative politics of Latin America at the London School of Economics.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















16 comments
Hi, all very welcome , very nice site .
I couldnt agree with you more...
Unfortunate pic above - she looks like Miss Berlin, 1936, or is that what we are supposed to think. Hard to keep track of these Latin countries sometimes, more often than not.
ehtch tee what does "ehtch tee" mean?
Besides the fact errors pointed out by "fijatevos" (very clever, because that is the name of the Web site fijatevos.com that debunks not only this twisted article but others of its ilk) Ms. Reid has managed to misinterpret the facts she gets right.I'm disappointed that New Statesman would not require more accuracy of its reporters.
Two letters as in initials. Quite droll really.
How nice that obama and his ilk are willing to spend billions of $$$ to "help" Costa Rica.....why the hell won't he spend that money PROTECTING OUR F-ING BORDERS!!???
Time will tell if Costa Ricans' gut-driven decision was right. Looks like the outsource call was made by the voters and not only by the decision makers.
Chinchilla's toughest job will be to safely stay in the U.S.A.'s influence area and out of the Narco's. Mostly because either one will be willing to sneak inside thought that non-armed-country window; as the Caribbean and Central America region is the geopolitical gateway to the south.
I have lived in Costa Rica for 15 years and would disagree with the article's perspective. There was a high degree of fiscal austerity under the Pacheco administration, however the past 4 years with Oscar Arias saw a significant increase in spending. This spending was mainly on infrastructure, but police forces were bolstered as well.
In addition there are some factual errors in the report. Chinchilla has not been "Arias' security minister since 1994": Arias was only president from 2006 to 2010, and during that term she served as Vice-President, not as a minister!
Worse, the article implies that Costa Rica will host this contingent of 7000 troops. If you read the article in La Nacion it is clear that the permission is for the troops to pass through Costa Rica's territorial waters, not to base themselves in Costa Rica, or even to operate on land.
Some surveys published in local media have indicated that crime rates are not as much of a problem, the actual statistics don't back the perception is that crime is rising. In other words what has gone up dramatically is the perception of crime, rather than the actual rates. Actually, Costa Rica's rates for violent crime compare very favorably with any country in the world.
People thinking of vacationing in Costa Rica won't have to worry about violent crime, although you should take the normal precautions you would take while traveling anywhere as theft in tourist areas is a problem.
However, the transit of drugs through the country does have some effects. One of the local papers, La Extra, has a "if it bleeds it leads" policy and nearly every day they are publishing a story on someone who has been murdered execution style. They will normally state that police believe that the crime was a result of the victim owing money or a turf war among drug dealers. This was not something you ever saw say 10 years ago.
In summary, I would disagree that Costa Rica is outsourcing its security problems. If anything, the US's actions in Colombia have brought the traffic here, and it makes perfect sense that the US should support the cost of combating their activities.
Russ Martin
Publisher, www.fijatevos.com
Yeah 'cause the "War on Drugs" has been soooooo successful up 'till now.
Ralph, like it or not we need the cheap labor.
good for Chinchilla, stop the drug flow, crime will wane in CR, as a american i am sorry to say most of the drugs that pass through CR are sold to the deadbeat addicts in the USA, good luck on her endeavor.
Comparing the number of US military personel that will be in Costa Rica at one time to the number in Haiti is nothing but a distortion of the facts.
Kudos go to President Chinchilla for doing something before the violence gets out of hand without busting the budget.
It's nice to see a country, any country with a comittment to fiscal prudence.
The US is going to prop up any right leaning government. If it can get a foothold for troops it can use to intimidate the region then so much the better. It's far easier to do that than face the potential embarrassment of being apologists for coups like the one in Honduras. Obama has managed to sweep that one under the carpet but couldn't get away with it twice without his administration being rumbled for the half-*rsed Reaganite monster it is.
doesn't put me off going on holiday to costa rica, which is where I am planning to travel to, but it's disappointing.
Quite sad. I got to know Costa Rican last year while on holiday who was particularly proud of the fact that his nation had no military.
There has been a significant expansion of the U.S military presence in South America since Obama came to office.
Who uses nuclear aircraft carriers to fight drugs? Its like an inverse of the Opium wars.