CommentPlus: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning’s papers.

1. We'll transform Britain by giving power away (Daily Telegraph)

David Cameron and Nick Clegg write about the aims of the coalition. Dealing with the Budget deficit is vital, but the real mission is to give people control over their lives through decentralisation.

2. From BP to the banks, Britain's delusions of grandeur have been cruelly exposed (Guardian)

We used to believe our nation punched above its weight, says Madeleine Bunting, but now it's become clear that Britain is a second-class state.

3. The eco-cause has taken a bigger hit than BP (Times)

Bill Emmott compares the University of East Anglia email scandal with the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. BP will bounce back, but the fallout from scientists' distortion on climate change will linger.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

4. Mandelson's vanity came before the party interest (Independent)

Mary Ann Sieghart discusses Peter Mandelson's memoir. If he is prepared to betray Gordon Brown for money now, perhaps he should have done so for the sake of his party two years ago.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

5. Labour must now stop this self-flagellation and regroup (Guardian)

As the party prepares for a breakout of diary wars, it risks being dangerously distracted, warns Jackie Ashley, when the real fight is for its future.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

6. After the rapture how to make Africa roar (Financial Times)

Should investors see South Africa as the conduit to the next great frontier? Alec Russell on the steps the country needs to take to ensure this is so.

Read the CommentPlus summary

7. Our trigger-happy reaction: blame the cops (Times)

There are countries where the police would not hesitate to shoot a man like Raoul Moat. Libby Purves says she is glad this is not one of them -- and we should cut the police some slack.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

8. Women bishops: what God would want (Guardian)

If Rowan Williams resolves the row over female bishops, says Una Kroll, the Church of England can teach society a lesson in coexistence.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

9. A president under business attack (Financial Times)

Barack Obama has not been unkind to business, writes Clive Crook. As far as finance is concerned, he has worked to moderate anti-business sentiment, not inflame it.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

10. Where is the help that was pledged to Haiti? (Times)

The Haiti-born singer Wyclef Jean draws attention to the continued crisis on the island. Six months after the earthquake, a million are still living in tents amid the rubble.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

Sign up now to CommentPlus for the pick of the day's opinion, comment and analysis in your inbox at 8am every weekday.

Getty
Show Hide image

How should Labour's disgruntled moderates behave?

The price for loyalty looks like being long-term opposition. Sometimes exiting can be brave.

When Albert O. Hirschman was writing Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to decline in Firms, Organizations, and States he wasn’t thinking of the British Labour Party.  That doesn’t mean, though, that one of the world’s seminal applications of economics to politics can’t help us clarify the options open to the 80 to 90 per cent of Labour MPs who, after another week of utter chaos, are in total despair at what’s happening under Jeremy Corbyn.

According to Hirschman, people in their situation have essentially three choices – all of which stand some chance, although there are no guarantees, of turning things around sooner or later.

The first option is simply to get the hell out: exit, after all, can send a pretty powerful, market-style signal to those at the top that things are going wrong and that something has to change.

The second option is to speak up and shout out: if the leadership’s not listening then complaining loudly might mean they get the message.

The third option is to sit tight and shut up, believing that if the boat isn’t rocked it will somehow eventually make it safely to port.

Most Labour MPs have so far plumped for the third course of action.  They’ve battened down the hatches and are waiting for the storm to pass.  In some ways, that makes sense.  For one thing, Labour’s rules and Corbyn’s famous ‘mandate’ make him difficult to dislodge, and anyone seen to move against him risks deselection by angry activists.

For another, there will be a reckoning – a general election defeat so bad that it will be difficult even for diehards to deny there’s a problem: maybe Labour has to do ‘déjà vu all over again’ and lose like it did in 1983 in order to come to its senses. The problem, however, is that this scenario could still see it stuck in opposition for at least a decade. And that’s presuming that the left hasn’t so effectively consolidated its grip on the party that it can’t get out from under.

That’s presumably why a handful of Labour MPs have gone for option two – voice.  Michael Dugher, John Woodcock, Kevan Jones, Wes Streeting and, of course, John Mann have made it pretty clear they think the whole thing’s a mess and that something – ideally Jeremy Corbyn and those around him – has to give.  They’re joined by others – most recently Stephen Kinnock, who’s talked about the party having to take ‘remedial action’ if its performance in local elections turns out to be as woeful as some are suggesting.  And then of course there are potential leadership challengers making none-too-coded keynote speeches and public appearances (both virtual and real), as well as a whole host of back and frontbenchers prepared to criticise Corbyn and those around him, but only off the record.

So far, however, we’ve seen no-one prepared to take the exit option – or at least to go the whole hog. Admittedly, some, like Emma Reynolds, Chuka Umunna, Dan Jarvis, Yvette Cooper, and Rachel Reeves, have gone halfway by pointedly refusing to serve in Corbyn’s Shadow Cabinet.  But nobody has so far declared their intention to leave politics altogether or to quit the party, either to become an independent or to try to set up something else.

The latter is easily dismissed as a pipe-dream, especially in the light of what happened when Labour moderates tried to do it with the SDP in the eighties.  But maybe it’s time to think again.  After all, in order to refuse even to contemplate it you have to believe that the pendulum will naturally swing back to Labour at a time when, all over Europe, the centre-left looks like being left behind by the march of time and when, in the UK, there seems precious little chance of a now shrunken, predominantly public-sector union movement urging the party back to the centre ground in the same way that its more powerful predecessors did back in the fifties and the late-eighties and nineties. 

Maybe it’s also worth wondering whether those Labour MPs who left for the SDP could and should have done things differently.  Instead of simply jumping ship in relatively small numbers and then staying in parliament, something much bolder and much more dramatic is needed.  What if over one hundred current Labour MPs simultaneously declared they were setting up ‘Real Labour’?  What if they simultaneously resigned from the Commons and then simultaneously fought scores of by-elections under that banner?

To many, even to ask the question is to answer it. The obstacles – political, procedural, and financial – are formidable and forbidding.  The risks are huge and the pay-off massively uncertain.  Indeed, the whole idea can be swiftly written off as a thought-experiment explicitly designed to demonstrate that nothing like it will ever come to pass.

On the other hand, Labour MPs, whether we use Hirschman’s three-way schema or not, are fast running out of options.  The price for loyalty looks like being long-term opposition.  Voice can only do so much when those you’re complaining about seem – in both senses of the word – immovable.  Exit, of course, can easily be made to seem like the coward’s way out. Sometimes, however, it really is the bravest and the best thing to do.

Tim Bale is professor of politics at QMUL. His latest book, Five Year Mission, chronicles Ed Miliband's leadership of the Labour party.