Why Richard Desmond said he’d like to buy the Sun

This was an attempt to exploit the internal tensions within Murdoch’s media empire.

Richard Desmond has caused a bit of a stir this morning by turning up on the Today programme and announcing that he'd like to buy the Sun.

Asked by the interviewer, Nick Cosgrove, if he would like to buy the tabloid, the proprietor of the Daily Express and the Daily Star replied: "Work it out for yourself." Pressed on whether he had discussed a deal with Rupert Murdoch, Desmond was mute, saying only: "I talk to him about many things."

He added that his "highly profitable business" would run the red-top "in a different manner, which would be more efficient in today's marketplace".

Desmond's words should not be interpreted as a serious offer for the Sun. Rather, they were an attempt to exploit the internal tensions within News Corp over the future of the company.

Murdoch remains adamantly opposed to selling any newspaper, but his children, whom he is determined to see inherit his business, do not share this view. James Murdoch, who oversees the European and Asian corners of his father's empire, has consistently emphasised that television and entertainment are far more valuable to the company and that newspapers will play a smaller part in the future.

A recent rumour that Murdoch was planning to sell the unprofitable Times came to nothing, but it, too, highlighted how the tectonic plates are beginning to shift. Murdoch will laugh off Desmond's chutzpah, but his children will have carefully noted the offer.

Special subscription offer: Get 12 issues for £12 plus a free copy of Andy Beckett's "When the Lights Went Out".

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

Photo: Getty Images
Show Hide image

No, Matt Hancock: under-25s are just as entitled to a payrise as the rest of us

At 25, parts of my body were more productive than the whole of Matt Hancock, says Jess Phillips.

I had never heard of Matt Hancock before today, which may be a sign of how productive he has been. He sprang up in my consciousness when he said this at the Tory party conference, when justifying not giving workers under 25 a payrise:

"Anybody who has employed people knows that younger people, especially in their first jobs, are not as productive, on average. Now there are some who are very productive under the age of 25 but you have to set policy for the average. It was an active choice not to cover the under 25s.”
No it bloody wasn't an active choice based on productivity! Lord knows this Government have failed to remember productivity for the past five years. How convenient to remember it when swindling young people.

Let's pretend for a minute that the Governments living wage is just that. Is Matt Hancock saying  that workers under 25 don't deserve to afford be able to live? By the time I was 25 I had a 3 year old. Did my son and I not deserve to be able to live? Oh and while they are there telling me I'm was an undeserving yoof, Hancock is now calling me useless. I don't know Matt Hancock I won't assume he was a lazy entitled toff, but I will wager at 23 I was as, if not more productive than him. I bet you I could have done his job, but he would have struggled to do mine. Maybe I'm wrong and he would have been a great support worker for refugees and carer for people with Alzheimer's all on three hours sleep a night whilst lactating.

Now, I'm not being fair. Of course he couldn't lactate.

The reason the government did this is nothing to do with productivity levels of young adults. It is because once again their limited life experience means that they think mummy and daddy pay for everything. Look no further than ridiculous student fees, cutting housing benefit for young people and now this "you don't deserve to be able to live" wage.

The hilarious thing will be when some employers completely disprove Hancock’s assertions and rush to employ lazy unproductive under 25s because they have to pay them less.
I won't bore you or Hancock with lists of brilliant examples of productive under 25s. The Twitter hashtag #at25 is full of great examples. The history of sport, science, music, art and computing is awash with inspiring world changing young people.Mr Hancock, here is a lesson I learned from the hundreds of productive young people I meet, be honest and say what you think. Your insulting gaffe is a pathetic spun cover up you arrived at when you were backed in to an impossible unjustifiable position. What you should have said was, "oh the reason we don't want to pay under 25s more is because we don't really care about them and let's be honest they don't really vote. Toodle pip."