Labour MP says something sensible about immigration
Why it would be hypocritical to restrict movement within the European Union.
By Daniel Trilling Published 09 June 2010 12:25
Denis MacShane, the former Europe minister and MP for Rotherham, has written an excellent piece for the London Evening Standard which attacks the position on immigration taken by some Labour leadership candidates. Ed Balls and Andy Burnham -- both of whom will be appearing with their fellow nominees at tonight's New Statesman leadership debate -- have suggested that Labour lost the election by failing to take a tough enough line on immigration.
In particular, MacShane points out the hypocrisy of the suggestion (made by Balls in Sunday's Observer) that Britain should persuade the EU to reconsider its commitment to open borders.
I wish any minister luck in Dublin as he explains to the Irish why European rules on free movement of people need to be revised. The French have long complained about the 500,000 Brits living in France fiddling benefits for children back home. And let's hope no Spanish politician starts to beat up on the 900,000 Brits living in Spain of whom, at last count, about 90 had learned any Spanish.
That last line also brings up a second point: the woeful track record of Brits at learning other languages. This is something the current government might like to consider, given today's announcement that it would bring forward measures requiring non-EU immigrant spouses to speak English.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















9 comments
NLV.
Agreed.
Labour MUST NEVER be allowed into office again.
Remind me what the EU is for again?
Labour messed up immigration so much in the last 13 years, they lost my trust.
I don't believe a word they say on the subject.
I for one will never vote labour again.
truth is though, thanks to the EU, we dont have full control over our borders(amoung other things) so immigration into this country seems to be a largely limited debate because at the end of the day, we cant really do that much about it. Question is, is this what we want for the nation, and is it healthy and in our intrest?
you believe what others say ?
who may I ask?
you believe what others say ?
who may I ask?
Immigration is not the issue. Staffing Public Services and casual agricultural work and the dirty jobs is.
It is clear that immigration will not simply go away as an issue, and with harsh cuts in public spending, will probably become a growing issue.
Take social housing- in 1990, the tories built around 10,000 council houses. In 2009, New Labour built just 300! Letting Bovis dictate housing policy has led to hardship and an increase in anti-immigrant feeling.
What is needed are politicians and parties willing to stand on principled ant-racist platforms, and who will argue that a greater share of the pain caused by Bankers should be borne by them.
Post new comment