The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Save the Daily Mirror

The Mirror is a key part of Labour’s fightback against the coalition. We can’t afford for it to be c

Every morning on his way home from his shift at the pit, my father would collect the Daily Mirror. Apart from the Daily Herald it was the only newspaper allowed in our home in Wigan. It was the newspaper of my childhood and I continue to buy it.

Now, more than ever, Labour needs the Daily Mirror -- a national newspaper to challenge the Conservative-dominated media and coalition.

We must rescue the paper from the clutches of a greedy, asset-stripping CEO.

For over 100 years, the Daily Mirror has been the paper of the left.

It is the paper that helped build support for the NHS after the world war.

It gave us the dynamic and radical journalism of Marjorie Proops, Paul Foot, Roy Greenslade, Alastair Campbell and Piers Morgan.

It was the only popular newspaper to speak out from the start against the invasion of Iraq.

It was the only paper to back Labour in 2010.

Now, under cover of the new Con-Dem government, the Mirror Group chief executive, Sly Bailey, is killing off a newspaper read daily across Britain by Labour's supporters.

Last week Trinity Mirror announced that 35 per cent of the journalists working across the three national titles would face redundancy.

Bolstered by her 66 per cent bonus rise in 2009 -- knowing Labour is distracted by a leadership election, and sure of support from the Con-Dem government -- Sly Bailey is killing off Labour's link to millions of readers.

Even though the axing of 1,700 staff, the freezing of wages and the disposal of 30 publications in 2009 helped Trinity Mirror stay comfortably in profit.

As the Wall Street Journal has noted:

"Her strategy of delivering shareholder value doesn't seem to extend to much beyond culling staff when the going gets tough."

Today's limited staff work 15-hour days to produce the newspaper.

So there is no slack to cut, if the paper is to maintain its relevance, radicalism and popular appeal.

A tiny skeleton staff will fill the paper with wire reports, like the Daily Express.

Mirror journalists will no longer have the resources to challenge the government, to oppose illegal wars, to investigate wrongdoing or to stand up for the rights of working people.

If stripping the paper of its journalistic assets were not bad enough, Sly is squeezing the Mirror's Labour-supporting readers dry.

Abusing readers' loyalty, she has bumped up the price of the paper to 45p -- more than double the price of the Sun in parts of the country. If Richard Desmond's threat to cut the price of the Daily Star in July materialises, the Daily Mirror will cost four times the price of the Star.

So Bailey expects Mirror readers to pay a premium for a product that she is hollowing out of good writing talent and experience.

Join us in calling for the resignation of Sly Bailey -- and fight for investment in the journalists that have built a great national Labour daily.

Anni Marjoram was adviser on women's issues to Ken Livingstone (2000-2008).

31 comments

thinkov's picture

I'm sorry ..I'm too wrapped up in the importance of intelligence....
the internet will save us

Adam Hill's picture

Sorry, are you cracked? The Daily Mirror's readership consists of Channel Five watching Peter Andre lovers and people who buy it for comedy value.

Dick the Prick's picture

'It gave us the dynamic and radical journalism of Marjorie Proops, Paul Foot, Roy Greenslade, Alastair Campbell and Piers Morgan'

Err..is this a sliding scale? No mention of Toilets either - shorely shome mishtake

swatantra's picture

Hear Hear. The Daily Mirror has the chance to be the very first Citzens Newspaper produced by the ordinary people for the ordinary people. If Citizen Journalists can be persuaded to put the paper together at a reasonable rate and for a reasonable street price then it has a chance of competing with the other tabloids. Journalists have their role but they also need citizen journalists to fill the paper out as well. But investment comes at a price. 45p is disgraceful; 30p should be the acceptable cover price. So its journalists are going to have to make sacrifices.

theonion's picture

This is what passes for satire around here??

Martyn Rowe's picture

"It was the only newspaper to speak out against the invasion of Iraq".

And the only one to knowingly print fake photographs of soliders committing illegal acts in Iraq.

jeremiah's picture

The Mirror used to be a great paper. That was until it followed The Scum downmarket.

When your father worked down't pit it was important but not now.

I hope The Guardian is happy with this terrible Government it urged so many of it's readers to elect!

mr_wonderful's picture

Whatever it's fault, it's the only tabloid newspaper prepared to oppose the Tories.

Justicia's picture

The reason its cutting journalists and raising its price is because, in spite of your opinion, it is a poor paper that is horrifically biased.

There is no media bias against the Labour party, there's just reality, and the mirror's failure to move with it is why it is collapsing.

roebuck's picture

Having worked for both the daily mirror and the daily herald (where i was father of the NUJ chapel) and having fought five general election campaigns and been an mp, I find the notion of A. Campbell and P. Morgan being "radical" as hilarious as is the notion of Livingstone being in the tradition of the labour party.

thinkov's picture

The new statesman now is the mirror 50 years ago
Go daily new statesman

The Mirror has dumbed down for so long we didn't even notice Blair steal our party

jeremiah's picture

@Justicia.

"There is no media bias against the Labour party"

ROTFLMAO!

Remind me how many papers support the Tories as opposed to Labour?!

Add Sky News, Nick Robinson and David Dimbleby to the mix and you have a slight imbalance in party preference. :P

swatantra's picture

Make the Mirror 'The Citizens Paper' and a 'free paper' at that.
The 'Metro' is given away free and is from a Tory stable.
Imagine the circulation figures, and it could still keep up its journalistic standards, and improve on them, and pay its contributors a decent wage.

Aliqot's picture

So how the devil did this Sly Bailey person get to be in charge of the whole shebang? And how can we call for her resignation?

I like swatantra nandanwar's idea of a free paper, but how will it pay for itself without the backing of some rich benefactor? Advertising? I don't think so. The unions? Kiss of death, and a propaganda tool for the Tories.

I'm depressing myself here.

jeremiah's picture

Sly Bailey? Sly Biatch, more like!

Orlando Harrison's picture

No it's not soft enough to wipe my precious bottom on.

Caroline's picture

No thinov..the internet won't "save"us.
It will kill off investigative, non-celebrity, indepth journalism.
As a former investigative reporter, I can tell you decent worthwhile investigations can take months to pull off.
The internet does not pay because everyone wants it for free and it has little value to advertisers.
There will nooone to pay the journalists to look into corruption, wrong-doing.
Good investigative reporters all tend to come up through the ranks of local papers. Those are being killed off too.
Internet journalists tend to be much younger, less experienced- they generally haven't been to a magistrate, police station or council meeting in their life, or ever learned how to get information.
So, no, the internet won't save anyone. It will kill off newspapers and in-depth journalism.

Freya Henderson's picture

Thank you for this Anni.
But I am so saddened and disappointed by some of the comments above.
So sad that it's still so "fashionable' for people who think they are intellectual to sneer at popular papers that have an important part in the democratic process.
I suppose people who think they are "clever" are happy just going to stand back smugly while the only paper to represent the Left gets decimated?
I am so sorry that people in this country take for granted the choice of papers we have in this country.
It's partly what makes Britain interesting - and the fact that there there is a always a place where wrongdoing can be exposed and investigated is what us the country we are.
Maybe the people above will be satisfied when the press is free and filled with advertorials and press releases - because that is the way we are heading.
Soon it will be gone

Caroline's picture

Many of the people commenting above clearly havent read the Mirror - or they would better informed about its contents.
Its so easy to sneer and sound important when you're anonymous though isn't it.
That's the problem with newspapers. Everyone's who's ever seen one in a newsagent becomes an armchair expert.
Believe me the journalists are already paying. Mirror reporters work 15 or 16 hours days - and they are paid the same as they were 15 years ago, which means they are now well below the average national wage.
In any case, after these cuts there's will only about three of them left.
It's Sly Bailey who took home a pay packet of 1.6 million who should be paying - not the journalists who never sees their families and can barely meet their mortgages.
They are accountable to their readers - unlike many of the commenters here

Aliqot's picture

So , what is to be done? If we all go out and buy the Mirror will that help? Or will we just be putting more money into Ms Bailey's bank account?

thinkov's picture

It's easy to sneer because it lost it's importance
how many on here read it?

John T. Capp's picture

"It gave us the dynamic and radical journalism of ... Alastair Campbell and Piers Morgan."

WTF?

john   perkins's picture

to sly bailey get lost leave our mirror alone it belongs to the people bug of

Keir's picture

How can it have lost its importance if it's the ONLY Labour supporting paper i the UK.
Did you actually even pick it up even ONCE - or read Paul Routledge's column or Kevin Maguire's leaders.
Sorry, but I thought there would be some intelligent, informed debate here.
The reason you are sneering it because you think you're above it all. The Mirror is not aimed at you.

ElaineS's picture

I'm behind you 100% As a diehard Labour supporter I was absolutely proud of the way you defended Labour and told the truth about many false incidences....you tracked down the truth and for all Labour supporters it was always appreciated after reading so much bile spewing from all the Mudoch Media. I'll pass this article around and you will get a lot of support. Long may the Mirror stay its honest, passionate and determined Labour paper! Mirror journalists are some of the best journalists around and ones to definitely write in a fair and honest way, I never tire of reading their articles. When The Guardian stupidly and idiotically abandoned Labour for those closet Torys, the Lib Dems, it was The Mirror that stood proud alongside Labour and we need The Mirror to continue to be fair and not afraid to be outspoken in the name of truth!

E Robertson's picture

The Mirror is a great paper and one I trust totally in reporting any political truths out there when all Murdoch media would lie through their teeth! Sly Bailey should be kicked to the kerb! Sly is going to take away our democratic right to read what has always been an honest and shoot from the hip newspaper and we need journalists like those that write for The Mirror. Has she been bought by Murdoch? Seems he wants to control everything we see and hear and by the sounds of it she is no better than him. SLY BAILEY TO GO!!!!

Caroline's picture

Sorry, but is everyone here deaf?
The Mirror was the ONLY paper to support the Labour Government in the last election.
How many times does it have to be said?
Which bit do you not understand?
If you recall, the Guardian defected - and that paper has less than a third of the readers of the Daily Mirror, which however dismissive you are is read by more than TWO MILLION people every single day and has sales of 1.2 million.

Freya Henderson's picture

While there soon wont be any reporters or feature writers left on the Mirror, I note that both Sly Bailey and editor Richard Wallace will still retain their personal drivers/chauffeurs.
Maybe they should try some public transport and save the job of a journalist who could keep the Mirror a decent, newsgathering paper.

thinkov's picture

if you want 2 million people served up trash as a labour paper then.... well...

I'm sticking with the morning star

Sam Leach's picture

While many will snigger and sneer at the red top cover of the Mirror, it infact isn't of the low standards of the downmarket rightwing newspapers like the Sun and Daily Star.

I read the Mirror, generally between 5-7 a week, and I'm a Labour member. I find it frustrating when people will repeatedly criticise the Mirror. I read it because 1) It is a loyal Labour paper, the only one that stood by Labour and the only one that will continue to be a voice and a side against the right wing pocket of Murdoch, 2) Because it isn't a heavy read, and can generally be read by all sections of society, allowing to convey the message in an easier way and 3) what many may believe is absent, the Mirror, contains many interesting and honest columnists, that speak the voice of many working class people across the country and stands up for fairness and progressive policies in this country.

Freya Henderson's picture

You'll be one of the two people who do then..It's not even available in most newsagents, so that's wouldn't really help would it?
Such a shame you are unable to see the bigger picture.

Latest tweets