The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

The idiocy of Labour’s immigration populism

The idea that the masses need to be placated by punishing outsiders shows how out of touch Labour ha

One deeply worrying aspect of the Labour leadership battle, for those hoping it will revitalise left-wing politics, is the frequency with which the candidates mention immigration.

Ed Balls suggests the party suffered electorally because people didn't know about its tough points system for migrants. David Miliband says "we were seen to be late to the game" on immigration. Andy Burnham sounds like a BNP leaflet: "People aren't racist, but they say it has increased tension, stopped them getting access to housing and lowered their wages."

It's true that many people have legitimate grievances about their lives -- over access to housing, to healthcare, to good schools, to secure jobs -- for which immigration (if politically manipulated) can become a touchstone. It is also true that all those insecurities have been compounded by New Labour and its obeisance to the market, which failed to provide public housing, polarised access to hospitals and schools under the rubric of "choice", and made call centres and job agencies the first port of call for working-class people trying to work.

In large part as a result of the marketisation of society, as well as the bailout of the financial elite, what we have now is a rapidly shrinking pool of public resources and an increasingly desperate struggle among poor people for access to them.

The cheap labour of some of those people, immigrants, was a key element of New Labour's "economic miracle", yet the state never acknowledged the role they played -- so when times went bad, nobody remembered what they had done to make them good. Instead, Miliband, Balls, Burnham et al seem intent on scapegoating immigrants to distract us from the real causes of hardship.

Not only is this morally contemptible; it's a lie. The lie of such "populism" is that it's not what ordinary people want. The one clear vote in the election (52 per cent of voters) was against Tory austerity and punishment of the poor. The idea that the cretinous masses need to be placated by punishing outsiders shows how out of touch as well as morally tarnished New Labour has become.

People in the real world are far more savvy. My play A Day at the Racists, about a disillusioned white worker drawn to the BNP, generates a constant stream of comments from black, white, brown, working- and middle-class audiences about how they won't fall for divide and rule and immigrant-bashing, how they know who the real villains are (unfortunately for the politicians, the answer to that seems to be . . . the politicians).

For young people especially, who in urban areas now live in a cultural and social melange of mixed heritages, races and accents, the clumsy polarities the Labour candidates are appealing to are something of the past -- exactly the wrong direction for a party crying out for new ideas.

There is now, I believe, a majority of people in Britain wanting a more tolerant, sophisticated and progressive politics than any party is willing to offer them. A Labour Party with an ounce of political nous would grab hold of those people, simply out of political expediency, if nothing else. For Labour instead to shove them back into a divisive, deceptive, anti-immigrant populism is tragic for the welfare of migrants and ordinary people alike -- and remarkably stupid politics.

Anders Lustgarten is a political activist and playwright. His play "A Day at the Racists" will be on tour throughout the UK in the coming months.

Special offer: get 12 issues of the New Statesman for just £5.99 plus a free copy of "Liberty in the Age of Terror" by A C Grayling.

13 comments

Barbara.'s picture

Wake up! Of course people feel threatened by mass immigration.
There are No jobs. No affordable housing and critics are accused of racism, it comes as no surprise that indigenous Britt's are beginning to feel angry and discriminated against.
These days we're unable to celebrate our own culture for fear of offending others, yet we're forced to accommodate the religious and cultural demands of immigrants, some have no intention of respecting ours. In fact in the area where I used to live the last time I visited I was threatened and racially abused, it's become a no go area for whites. I am outraged by this and outraged at our governments stupidity for allowing this to happen. No doubt some brain washed sad moron won't even understand any of this, they want these concerns silenced.

ConcernedCitizen's picture

So the main thesis of the article is pretty much any rhetoric on immigration controls is tantamount to a betrayal of Labour values of fairness and equality.

What a great way to commit cultural suicide.

Terry7's picture

Anders Lustgarten writes "It's true that many people have legitimate grievances about their lives -over access to housing, to healthcare, to good schools, to secure jobs- for which immigration (IF politically manipulated) can become a touchstone".

Precisely, IT WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED. Labour may very latterly have introduced a SLIGHTLY more rigorous set of rules but for years that deliberately introduced a mass immigration policy for England, despite a lack of housing and services already. Read former Labour policy wonk and speech writer Andrew Neather's 23.10.09 article in the London Evening Standard 'Don't listen to the whingers - London needs immigrants' here: http://bit.ly/d3i1T5 and also read about the already existant population ticking timebomb 'Rising immigration could double population of Britain by 2081'(Standard, 29.2.10) here: ttp://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23423366-rising-immigration-could-double-population-of-britain-by-2081.do

Worse than this however was that Labour did this secretly, fearing the backlash from their own traditional support-base who were always going to lose out to people undercutting their quotes if self-employed or their labour rates if employed. But then that was the plan, to bring in millions more immigrants to bolster the working population to make Britain more competitive. Never mind the indigenous population!

I feel so sorry for the ordinary WORKING PEOPLE of this country who were delibereately BETRAYED BY LABOUR. And here are the new Lanour leadership candidates continuing to make out they are still the good guys. What a joke.

I wish to make it crystal clear that I do not condone attacks, verbal or otherwise, on immigrants at any time. If someone is in the UK legally and have a right to work then they have done nothing wrong and nobody should blame them. But if you feel you own lives have been undermined and your childrens' opportunities then blame the people who are really responsible. That meaas New Labour, pure and simple.

Just for the record, I voted Labour into power in 1997 and I voted them out in 2010. I did not vote for the loathesome BNP and their policy of hatred. I could not vote Lib-Dem because I disagree with Britain unilaterally giving up our nuclear deterrent, never want to join the Euro, and certainly never wish to see foreign powers given one more inch of influence over the governance of our country rather than our own elected governement (whether you like them and voted for them or not). On all three counts this deleted the Lib-Dems but also Labour as we hear from Ed Balls that Gordon Brown offered to scrap Trident in secret talks with them about setting up a Lib-Lab coalition after the election, despite universal support in the Labour cabinet for maintaining Trident as the only viable defense and stating so publicly to the British people.

So I voted Tory and regret it not one bit. In fact reading some of the leftie journalists and comments slag of the new coalition when they've only just begun and have to clear up the almight financial mess Labour left behind yet again I feel positively delighted that I voted Tory.

'New' Labour ... same old lies. Never again!

maxinemf's picture

How can the current government claim to be representing the national interest when the LIB Dem and Conservative vote combined represents only 59% of the Vote, Surely a true national coalition would have included Labour. Surely Nick Clegg should not be squatting in 10 Downing Street

synergise's picture

Jesus, it's so easy to scapegoat immigration for everything. It adds to the economy, it's really not the worst thing in the world. And you can't do anything about the vast majority anyway, coming as it does from the EU. Blaming all our problems on immigration is dangerous and traditionally tory, I hope Labour aren't going to be stooping to that level, it's really quite pathetic.

ISC's picture

I think that Anders must be quite deluded to believe that he has a wide enough working class audience for his play to be able to draw any conclusions what so ever.

He is doubly deluded if he believes that support for the current levels of immigration is a vote winner for the Labour Party.

Redmeat's picture

I'm noticing the same comments and phrases as on the Graun comment section. The same spelling mistakes as well. Looks like the xenaphobic and/or racist trolls are on the loose again

Redmeat's picture

That said, Labour have failed in affordable housing and providing a living wage for all. But I switch off when people start saying 'indiginous peoples', like they are part of the last f**king Mowhawk Indian tribe. Unless your Welsh please don't use that phrase; it shows that you didn't listen at all in your school history lessons.

Redmeat's picture

Oh, Oh and one last thing. Barbara have you tried looking here? Its a marvelous website

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/employment/jobseekers/index.htm

There appears to be quite a number of jobs. Not many good ones mind, I should know I'm currently a jobseeker myself. You make the common mistake of not discerning between 'no jobs' and 'lots of sh*t jobs'. Toddle off to Mogadishu if you want to see no jobs... No thats not in Pakistan

Chris's picture

Should someone introduce Rob to Barbara?

Ian's picture

Immigration is just the hype of the moment. I would hope that Labour wouldn't appease the BNP.

terence patrick hewett1's picture

The coalition will instigate an Australian style immigration policy to replace the chaos we have at present. And that will be that.

Rob's picture

Anders, you're in fantasy ville. Firstly, and most importantly, get it into your head that it is not racist, it is not even xenophobic, to be opposed to a million and more people moving to this over crowded little island in less than a decade. The numbers were unprecedented outside of wartime.

If you only factor in "economic" benefits, and don't bother to think about additional demands on housing, health, transport and schooling, then you a fool.

Middle class idiots like you can't get beyond a sodding guilt complex about the empire, and a real contempt for working class people who did not ask to make way for an influx of young, cheap and mobile east Europeans, large extended families from basket cases like Pakistan and assylum seekers who cross every safe border in Europe to end up in Dover.

I fear that your play won't go down well outisde Islington.

Latest tweets