Nick Robinson and the rainbow coalition
“Audacious” move leaves BBC man dazed, if not confused.
By Jon Bernstein Published 11 May 2010 13:17
With the possible exception of his Sky News counterpart, Adam Boulton, the BBC's political editor, Nick Robinson, looked like the most shocked man in Britain following Gordon Brown's Downing Street announcement yesterday afternoon.
"Audacious" was the word Robinson used on the television and on his blog, but you suspected something stronger was going through his mind. Since last Friday, Robinson has barely deviated from a line that has David Cameron in No 10 as a result of either a formal or an informal arrangement with the Lib Dems. A rainbow coalition was not in his script.
It may not come to pass, but it is strange that the possibility of a Lib-Lab deal wasn't given more airspace until yesterday.
In a post last night, Robinson outlined all the obstacles in the way of Brown's power play. He asked:
- is it legitimate for Gordon Brown and Labour to stay in office, having lost this election?
- is it right for a new prime minister to be chosen, not by voters, but by Labour Party members?
Well, I guess it depends how you interpret the words "legitimate" and "right", but constitutionally the answer to both questions is an emphatic "Yes". Here is Vernon Bogdanor, professor of government at Oxford University, writing in the forthcoming issue of the New Statesman to provide the historical context:
The conventions reflect the fundamental principle of parliamentary government: that parliament decides who should govern. A prime minister in office is not defeated until the Commons votes him out. Until 1868, it was common practice for incumbents to test the opinion of parliament after a general election. That year, Disraeli became the first to break from this tradition -- he thought it pointless to meet parliament when his opponents enjoyed an overall majority.
With the development of a two-party system, it became customary for incumbents to resign if the election resulted in an overall majority for the opposition. But, in 1885-86, 1892 and 1923-24, with hung parliaments, prime ministers -- Conservative in each case -- waited until parliament had met and then produced a Queen's Speech that was, in effect, a vote of confidence. It is for parliament, not the bankers or the Daily Mail, to decide who should govern.
Robinson signs off the post by asking of Nick Clegg:
Does he now stick to his chosen path and do a deal with the Conservatives to the fury of many in his party or does he switch to Labour, risking the wrath of those who will accuse him of creating a "coalition of losers"?
"His chosen path"? Clegg always said he would talk to the Conservatives first, as the party with the "strongest mandate" to govern. But a corollary of this is not necessarily a "deal with the Conservatives".
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















19 comments
Rainbow Brown,Nasty Nick posters looking good, spotted them earlier in shop window, nice little touch the Gavel in colours of a Rainbow coming down on the English, sold out poster next to them.
Inrteresting that the two Labour negotiators who are most serious about a deal are unelected! Nothing changes in the Labour party does it!
I'm no tory, but I think they've conducted themselves with dignity (Rifkind aside), and I would rather see elected tory MPs calling the shots than Mandelson, Campbell et al. Nick Robinson & Adam Boulton have been nailing their colours (not rainbow) to the mast of late haven't they!
I wish we could also elect new presenters who are not nailing blue flags to masts at every opportunity. We're turning into a benign media dictatorship.
We need media reform as much as electoral reform.
Yes, amazed by level of bias shown not just by Boulton and Kellner but by Robinson. Great they're getting a reminder this is a UK-wide parliamentary democracy.
I am so glad to see this post. I have found Robinson amazingly biased on so many occasions. He has talked on several occasions about "my hunch" of a Lib-Tory pact and he has been vociferous in trying to make that the narrative and has given short shrift to the alternatives. He has also talked about the Tories "winning the election" - they have not done so. Saying that confuses people who don't spend every waking moment thinking about politics and makes a Lib-Lab government seem illegitimate. Stupidly, some Labour MPs seem to want to buy into that notion as well. Labour and the Liberal Democrats should do a deal not just because it is in the nation's best interests but because it will teach right-wing newspapers and former Young Conservative presidents a very big lesson in trying to scare and bully the public and political parties into getting David Cameron into Downing Street.
If anyone expected any other approach to the election from Messrs Robinson, Bradby and Boulton than a none too subtle nudge of the viewer in the direction of the Tory Party then they must have been daft to begin with.
The script was for a Tory majority government. We, the electorate, went off script last Thursday, and the political editors of SKY, BBC and ITV have been spitting venom because of it ever since - culminating in Boulton and Robinson's performances yesterday (not to mention Bradby's 10 o'clock news near apoplexy last night).
British broadcasting stinks to high heaven.
Get Labour out!
'Is it right for a new prime minister to be chosen, not by voters, but by Labour party members?'
How was John Major chosen in 1990 ?
Bob (the builder?) makes a fair point, Major did inherit the premiership. It stunk then, and it stinks now. As our system has effectively become presidential, with the country run by one person and their unelected advisors, and it is very weak to argue that parliament chooses the government. Let's go the whole hog and recognise that the parliamentary system, a relic of former centuries in no longer fit for purpose. Republic now, I say, all hail to President Farage!
I'm ex-Labour these days, but in my heart I hold to values the pre-dated my time in the party and which have been tramplef on by careerists and opportunists. Many anti-Tories probably feel the same, they have respected democracy while NuLabour has acted cynically. John Reid is right, a Lab-Lib government would be mutually damaging. Go to the backbenches, be a good opposition instead and remind yourselves of what Labour really stands for. The database state you leave behind must be dismantled. Time to go.
I couldn't care less about Adam Boulton, Kay Burley and all the rest of the sycophants paid to push the views of a right wing non dom Ameraussie press baron. After all I can choose not to buy his wares. However, as long as Nick Robinson is getting his pay from me and you through the Licence fee one would like to imagine he would be able to at least appear impartial. He was practically spitting in apoplexy yesterday afternoon.
The BBC which is supposedly meant to be impartial and unbiased should perhaps be putting a word of warning to him in these times when the Murdocracy is trying to undermine it.
Amongst other things this election has certainly changed my views on the licence fee. Perhaps it is time it had to stand on its own merits, minus the licence fee. I for one could get better value for money for my £140+p/a online.
Labour presented themselves to the electorate with GB as Prime Minister and they now want to say to the electorate "Sorry we have shanged our minds and because you don't like GB we will choose somebody else to run the country but we won't tell for 4 months and we won't ask you to agree by voting!" This is unprecedented and I believe illegitimate. It is pure political cynicism
The old aphorism "He who sups with devil needs a long spoon" springs to mind. Is Nick Clegg's spoon long enough?
wgho cares about the mad irish hate politics . WATE TILL THEY REALISE CLEGG AN CAMRON SOLD THEM A LEMON AV IS NOT proportional voteing syestem al all . its not any more proportional than first passed the post . as far as irish politics goes i hate it , none of the would know god if they fell over him the catholics and the protestants . there arnt christians in northon island only hate for each other . the dup is as bad as the sinn fain .
this wanker looses his seat then expects to keep the dup party leadership hes worse than gordon brown ,imagine a con a lab leader keeping the party leadership after looseing their seat . you are a discrase and should step down you lost . you lost to a party against your politics of hate , were sick in northorn island of the politics of hate from both sides , catholics and protestants they are as bad as each other .
how can the dup claim to be a center left non conservitive party and prop up the tories like they do .the only partys worth anything in northan island are the sdlp or the alliance , the other partys like the dup and thne catholic party are just hate partys
It's a pity the prospect of a Lib-Lab pact didn't last longer - Nick Robinson's head might have exploded. He clearly took the possible rejection of a Lib-Con coalition as a personal affront. In his tiny right-wing mind he thinks he's responsible for making the news and for dictating Tory policy. How dare those pesky voters contradict him!
Cameron made a deal with the devil - Murdoch - agreeing to make huge cuts to the BBC. Nick Robinson's election coverage was a long and desperate plea to keep his job. As was the extraordinary display of fellow Tory-flirt Laura Kuenssberg whose provocative poses were clearly an offer to do 'whatever it takes'. Saucy minx!
And while we're on the subject...I hope Nick Clegg isn't feeling too sore this morning (and I hope he remembers to pull his trousers up before appearing in public).
Also, has anyone else noticed that these Tories who are suddenly appearing from God knows where all have really smooth, shiny skin? What's the secret? Good diet? Moisturiser? Or are they all made of rubber perhaps? Nick Robinson's head is quite obviously a bouncy ball. And Laura Kuenssberg's rubbery mouth is almost unnaturally flexible - even thinking about it now I feel strange stirrings 'down below'. And why does she blink so often? It's all very, very strange. Like an episode of 'Dr Who'.