The Clegg/Cameron doorstep face-off
Why they can’t keep their hands off each other.
By Sophie Elmhirst Published 12 May 2010 14:56I want you to watch this video very carefully. And then again. And then maybe once more.
Have you ever seen so much hand action in your life? To start with, there's the classic handshake-plus-arm-grab from Nick Clegg. Solid, friendly, keen. Then the handshake hardens, becomes immobile, as though they're both playing chicken -- neither willing to let go first. I bet someone had a finger crushed at this point (although neither really seems the finger-crushing type).
There follows the genial back-tap by David Cameron, a classically patronising movement. But just when we've got used to the formation, up go their arms! It's like a Siamese wave! Or synchronised swimmers! They must have practised -- that kind of perfect execution doesn't come for free -- so symmetrical, balanced, rhythmic. And both, if you look closely, wearing that same clenched smile, the one that says: "Yup. Here we are. Pretty big day. And I'm responsible and serious, and ready to run this goddam country, in case you were wondering."
Quickly, and tellingly, we're back into competition -- neither wants to bring his arm down first, like two kids in a breath-holding contest, suffering agony in order to claim victory. And then the wonderful, clinching double-back-clap-and-wave manoeuvre, so often attempted, so rarely achieved.
They really excel themselves here. Yet still that element of competition -- if you clap my back, I'll clap yours just that much harder: I am the greater statesman, and this back-clap proves it once and for all!
Who wins? Well, it's clear, isn't it? Cameron swings back in with that final back-tap, which develops, outrageously, into a back-clasp, hardly ever attempted on these shores. He hasn't let go by the time the film ends -- I imagine they're still locked in that position as they embark on their first meeting, Cameron awkwardly refusing to surrender his puppet-holding clutch on Clegg's jacket.
Who would have thought 20 seconds of film could essentially tell you all you need to know about our new government?
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















15 comments
Cameron was being patronising. "i'm the boss" kind of vibe. Diff for Clegg. Agree with Yeti though - always thought Cam is a dark horse and not totally trustworthy
there are also the same age (43), born within a few months of each other at the same hospital.. that last little detail is a complete and utter fabrication!
Nick and Dave sittin' in a tree -
L E G I S L A T I N G.
I think this about sums it up:
http://kicklight.com/video/kicklight/id/MTAwMDY3
Oxbridge educated, private school, white, male, wealthy.
Harold Macmillan has been resurrected. Stand by for some major shafting for the masses.
As one of the masses I'm slightly worried by the previous comment. Has Harold Macmillan really been resurrected? And does he really want to shaft me? Majorly? I didn't vote for that. I thought at most I might get more of those nice people coming to my door. Or more of those lovely letters asking me to vote - you know the ones signed with a big kiss. They made me smile, and I was so happy, and not so lonely any more. But now I'm really not sure. Watching Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg setting up home together was a bit of a shock; however in this day and age young men often choose to cohabit - to 'experiment' as they say. I'm open-minded enough to accept that. But the thought of being violated by a long-dead-but-now-reborn-former-Tory-Prime-Minister is frankly more than I can stand. For one thing, that moustache is not my cup of tea. Nor is the pipe-smoking, so he'll have to quit that. And won't he be a bit smelly after all those years in the ground? No, I'm sorry - I can't agree to that sort of thing.
Well, Balzac, you may not be dead but your comments sure smells funny. Haven't you understood that your opinion is worth doodly squat? Now for a serious comment. Here are two serious young men who are going to change Britain for you. They don't know what, they don't know how but what they will do is make life more expensive and uncomfortable for the like of you and me. You wanted a hung parliament, didn't you? Now you know what it means. Five years of Tory propaganda. the schools minister is going to make all the boys wear ties! (Guardian today) Now THAT will really improve standards.
sophie, camrons puppet you got that right.
well they are both tories clegg and canbelt , hay wate till they realise clegg wants to swap our horrible first passed the post voteing syestem for well first passed the post . the av syestem not listed as a proportional voteing syestem its an alternitive first passed the post syestem . aps what do you think will hapen when they realise clegg has sold out on pr voteing . ask those 1000 protesters the other day .
I think you can tell that this is a photo opportunity as for some hugely revealing body language, I'd stick with crop circle if I were you.
I shook hands with Clegg once, so maybe (hopefully) Cameron now has my germs
Sophie - your analysis is spot on... and indeed signals the future struggles for the alpha male role ... at least they don't have to display for any females in this cabinet!
A new era and a new word in British politic's......... CON DEM
Watching news conference at the moment.
I have to say they are pretty impressive. Cameron is a bit of a dark horse isnt he.
there congratulating each other cos they cant believe their luck...simple