CommentPlus: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning’s papers.

1. The Eurosceptic case for saving the euro (Times)

The crisis in the eurozone is too good an opportunity for Eurosceptics to waste, writes the Tory backbencher John Redwood. In return for helping the single currency to survive, Britain should ask for the repatriation of employment and social powers.

2. Murdoch has to become an elitist (Financial Times)

If Rupert Murdoch's plan to charge readers for online news is to succeed, his titles will have to become more specialist, offering rarer data and information, says John Gapper.

3. Jamaica bleeds for our "war on drugs" (Guardian)

The tragic violence in Jamaica is symptomatic of the failure of the US-led "war on drugs", argues Ben Bowling. The international community must rethink its entire approach if it is to build a lasting peace.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

4. A return to tribalism won't help Labour (Independent)

Labour is showing all too many signs of taking its narrow escape as an endorsement of politics as usual, writes John Rentoul.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

5. Lord, make Labour relevant. But not yet . . . (Times)

Elsewhere, David Aaronovitch says that the danger to Labour is not of madness, but of irrelevance. The leadership election should be about having something important to say.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

6. Voters wanted this harmony, but British politics could turn nasty quickly (Daily Telegraph)

For now, the nation is enthused by its new government and by the spectacle of politicians working together, writes Benedict Brogan. But the inherent contradictions of the coalition and the need for greater legislative detail could soon change this.

7. Cameron's cuts and crisis in the eurozone spell disaster (Guardian)

Plans for "austerity cuts" in Britain and across Europe risk years of economic stagnation and slump, says Seumas Milne.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

8. Cameron's European opportunity (Independent)

Suggesting a possible Nixon-in-China moment, John Lichfield explains why David Cameorn could become the Prime Minister who finally reconciles the British people with Europe.

9. Britain's ballooning prison population is a disastrous mess (Times)

In a severe economic crisis, it is folly to have policies that make the prison population higher than necessary, argues Harry Woolf.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

10. The dark side of China's enduring dream (Financial Times)

China's lightning growth should not blind us to appalling conditions in the country's factories, writes David Pilling.

Read the CommentPlus summary.

Sign up now to CommentPlus for the pick of the day's opinion, comment and analysis in your inbox at 8am, every weekday.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Who will win in Stoke-on-Trent?

Labour are the favourites, but they could fall victim to a shock in the Midlands constituency.  

The resignation of Tristram Hunt as MP for Stoke-on-Central has triggered a by-election in the safe Labour seat of Stoke on Trent Central. That had Westminster speculating about the possibility of a victory for Ukip, which only intensified once Paul Nuttall, the party’s leader, was installed as the candidate.

If Nuttall’s message that the Labour Party has lost touch with its small-town and post-industrial heartlands is going to pay dividends at the ballot box, there can hardly be a better set of circumstances than this: the sitting MP has quit to take up a well-paid job in London, and although  the overwhelming majority of Labour MPs voted to block Brexit, the well-advertised divisions in that party over the vote should help Ukip.

But Labour started with a solid lead – it is always more useful to talk about percentages, not raw vote totals – of 16 points in 2015, with the two parties of the right effectively tied in second and third place. Just 33 votes separated Ukip in second from the third-placed Conservatives.

There was a possible – but narrow – path to victory for Ukip that involved swallowing up the Conservative vote, while Labour shed votes in three directions: to the Liberal Democrats, to Ukip, and to abstention.

But as I wrote at the start of the contest, Ukip were, in my view, overwritten in their chances of winning the seat. We talk a lot about Labour’s problem appealing to “aspirational” voters in Westminster, but less covered, and equally important, is Ukip’s aspiration problem.

For some people, a vote for Ukip is effectively a declaration that you live in a dump. You can have an interesting debate about whether it was particularly sympathetic of Ken Clarke to brand that party’s voters as “elderly male people who have had disappointing lives”, but that view is not just confined to pro-European Conservatives. A great number of people, in Stoke and elsewhere, who are sympathetic to Ukip’s positions on immigration, international development and the European Union also think that voting Ukip is for losers.

That always made making inroads into the Conservative vote harder than it looks. At the risk of looking very, very foolish in six days time, I found it difficult to imagine why Tory voters in Hanley would take the risk of voting Ukip. As I wrote when Nuttall announced his candidacy, the Conservatives were, in my view, a bigger threat to Labour than Ukip.

Under Theresa May, almost every move the party has made has been designed around making inroads into the Ukip vote and that part of the Labour vote that is sympathetic to Ukip. If the polls are to be believed, she’s succeeding nationally, though even on current polling, the Conservatives wouldn’t have enough to take Stoke on Trent Central.

Now Theresa May has made a visit to the constituency. Well, seeing as the government has a comfortable majority in the House of Commons, it’s not as if the Prime Minister needs to find time to visit the seat, particularly when there is another, easier battle down the road in the shape of the West Midlands mayoral election.

But one thing is certain: the Conservatives wouldn’t be sending May down if they thought that they were going to do worse than they did in 2015.

Parties can be wrong of course. The Conservatives knew that they had found a vulnerable spot in the last election as far as a Labour deal with the SNP was concerned. They thought that vulnerable spot was worth 15 to 20 seats. They gained 27 from the Liberal Democrats and a further eight from Labour.  Labour knew they would underperform public expectations and thought they’d end up with around 260 to 280 seats. They ended up with 232.

Nevertheless, Theresa May wouldn’t be coming down to Stoke if CCHQ thought that four days later, her party was going to finish fourth. And if the Conservatives don’t collapse, anyone betting on Ukip is liable to lose their shirt. 

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to British politics.