Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Cameron first Tory since 1987 to start with a poll lead

Cameron is the first Tory leader for 23 years to enter an election campaign ahead of Labour.

David Cameron may be far from certain to win a majority at the election but he is still the first Conservative Party leader since 1987 to enter the campaign with a clear poll lead.

Here are the results of polls conducted just before each of the past five elections was called. All figures are taken from ICM.

 

12 May 1987

Conservatives 43%

Labour 29%

Liberal Democrats 25%

7 March 1992

Conservatives 39%

Labour 42%

Liberal Democrats 15%

2 March 1997

Conservatives 30%

Labour 48%

Liberal Democrats 16%

22 April 2001

Conservatives 33%

Labour 47%

Liberal Democrats 14%

3 April 2005

Conservatives 34%

Labour 37%

Liberal Democrats 21%

 

Today's Guardian/ICM poll puts the Tories on 37 per cent, with Labour 4 points behind on 33 per cent.

It's still remarkable to think that while a 3 per cent lead in 2005 (Labour won 35.3 per cent to the Tories' 32.3 per cent of the actual vote) was enough to give Tony Blair an overall majority of 66, a Tory lead of 4 per cent would likely leave Labour as the single largest party in the Commons.

Only twice since the Second World War (in 1951 and in February 1974) has the party with the most votes not won the most seats in parliament.

If the Tories are the winning party in votes but the losing party in seats, we can expect to see a series of newspaper headlines declaring: "Crisis as winning party loses election".

The resultant anger and confusion could transform the dimensions of the debate about electoral reform.

Follow the New Statesman team on Facebook.

Tags: Election 2010

2 comments

9xzulug's picture

the omens are not good for the CONNEDSERVADIV PARTY due to the fact when the world's banking fiasco virtually brought many nations to their knees,Mr Cameron's fiscal idea would have caused more widespread chaos which leaves waive ring voters wondering if his party are capable of decisive decision making.finally their policies have no substance and relevance to modern day Britain.If it wasn't for the expenses farce by all mp's,i feel CONNEDSRVADIVS wouldn't even be in their position for the race to govern.w.k.moss aka 9xzulug

Sam's picture

We should have a parliament free of political parties.

In my view the best option would be for local residents of a constituency to elect a local person based on merit and policies. Then the people within that elected parliamentary body elect the leader again based on merit.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets