Wanted: the story of Ellie Gellard

. . . aka @BevaniteEllie.

It was always likely to be a strange day for Ellie Gellard, known to her (3,000-plus) Twitter followers as @BevaniteEllie. Just when you'd expect her to provide a blow-by-blow account of Labour's manifesto launch in 140-character bursts, all went quiet on the Twittersphere.

Why? Because she was there in person, on the podium, introducing the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown. Not a bad gig for a 20-year-old party activist.

What followed was fairly inevitable. First, her previous online utterings were trawled for something "embarrassing", or at least not on-message (I'm not sure they're the same thing).

Sure enough, this blog post came to light. Judging by the social media audit trail, it looks like Conservative press office researchers got busy pretty quickly: their head of press, Henry Macrory, tweeted it just before 3pm, and it wasn't long before Tory Bear and Iain Dale were following his lead.

Second, she was asked to do a media interview. But, much to the dismay of Sky News, she said no. Nonetheless, expect a smattering of mini-profiles in tomorrow's papers.

(Incidentally, last time she made a mini-splash was when she successfully campaigned to show the "Against the Odds" video as an election broadcast.)

UPDATE (13 April): Sure enough, the Times and the Daily Telegraph have prominent pictures of Gellard on their front pages this morning.

Follow the New Statesman team on Facebook.

Jon Bernstein, former deputy editor of New Statesman, is a digital strategist and editor. He tweets @Jon_Bernstein. 

Getty
Show Hide image

The 5 things the Tories aren't telling you about their manifesto

Turns out the NHS is something you really have to pay for after all. 

When Theresa May launched the Conservative 2017 manifesto, she borrowed the most popular policies from across the political spectrum. Some anti-immigrant rhetoric? Some strong action on rip-off energy firms? The message is clear - you can have it all if you vote Tory.

But can you? The respected thinktank the Institute for Fiscal Studies has now been through the manifesto with a fine tooth comb, and it turns out there are some things the Tory manifesto just doesn't mention...

1. How budgeting works

They say: "a balanced budget by the middle of the next decade"

What they don't say: The Conservatives don't talk very much about new taxes or spending commitments in the manifesto. But the IFS argues that balancing the budget "would likely require more spending cuts or tax rises even beyond the end of the next parliament."

2. How this isn't the end of austerity

They say: "We will always be guided by what matters to the ordinary, working families of this nation."

What they don't say: The manifesto does not backtrack on existing planned cuts to working-age welfare benefits. According to the IFS, these cuts will "reduce the incomes of the lowest income working age households significantly – and by more than the cuts seen since 2010".

3. Why some policies don't make a difference

They say: "The Triple Lock has worked: it is now time to set pensions on an even course."

What they don't say: The argument behind scrapping the "triple lock" on pensions is that it provides an unneccessarily generous subsidy to pensioners (including superbly wealthy ones) at the expense of the taxpayer.

However, the IFS found that the Conservatives' proposed solution - a "double lock" which rises with earnings or inflation - will cost the taxpayer just as much over the coming Parliament. After all, Brexit has caused a drop in the value of sterling, which is now causing price inflation...

4. That healthcare can't be done cheap

They say: "The next Conservative government will give the NHS the resources it needs."

What they don't say: The £8bn more promised for the NHS over the next five years is a continuation of underinvestment in the NHS. The IFS says: "Conservative plans for NHS spending look very tight indeed and may well be undeliverable."

5. Cutting immigration costs us

They say: "We will therefore establish an immigration policy that allows us to reduce and control the number of people who come to Britain from the European Union, while still allowing us to attract the skilled workers our economy needs." 

What they don't say: The Office for Budget Responsibility has already calculated that lower immigration as a result of the Brexit vote could reduce tax revenues by £6bn a year in four years' time. The IFS calculates that getting net immigration down to the tens of thousands, as the Tories pledge, could double that loss.

Julia Rampen is the digital news editor of the New Statesman (previously editor of The Staggers, The New Statesman's online rolling politics blog). She has also been deputy editor at Mirror Money Online and has worked as a financial journalist for several trade magazines. 

0800 7318496