Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Labour rebels attempt to block Straw libel reform

Labour MPs attempt to thwart plans to slash success fees for British libel lawyers.

One of the few positive developments in recent months has been Jack Straw's belated support for libel reform.

In a plan first trailed to the NS, the Justice Secretary promised to reduce lawyers' success fees from a maximum of 100 per cent to 10 per cent. Significantly, he confirmed that the measure could be introduced before the election through secondary legislation.

Action in this area is long overdue. Research by Oxford University shows that the cost of fighting a libel action in England is 140 times (yes, you read that right) greater than the European average.

But last night Straw's plan was thrown into doubt after Labour MPs blocked the measure at committee stage. The guilty men were Tom Watson, Peter Kilfoyle, Chris Mullin and Jim Sheridan. The Tory MP Julie Kirkbride also voted against the passage of the law.

Coincidentally, Watson recently received "substantial damages" after suing the Sun over claims that he was involved in the McBride email smears scandal. He was represented by the law firm Carter-Ruck, which is lobbying fiercely against libel reform.

The Labour rebellion means that the measure must now return to the Commons after the Easter recess. It can be passed without a vote, but if any MP objects it will return to the House the next day for a full parliamentary vote.

The "no win, no fee system" was created in 1995 with the honourable aim of providing the poorest with access to justice, yet it has left small publishers unable to defend themselves and has discouraged original stories and investigative journalism.

It will be a scandal if this opportunity for reform is missed.

Follow the New Statesman team on Facebook.

Tags: Libel

2 comments

Will's picture

It's good that MPs are not just obeying their party whip and decide to exercise their best judgement. It's just a shame that this is indeed their "best" judgement.

It's very rare for any Government to suffer any defeat in a Division in the Commons and indeed in the Labour Government suffered no such defeat throughout their first terms. Fortunately, for the good of democracy and free speech in general, this didn't happen this time round.

Jury Team (http://www.juryteam.org) are pleased to see members of parliament voting how they see fit and not just what they told. They even propose that MPs should be free to vote in line with their best judgement and should not be sanctioned for obeying their party whip on matters not in its manifesto (http://www.juryteam.org/p18-independent-mps.php)

Carl Packman1's picture

very telling use of the word coincidentally there

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets