Morning Call: pick of the comment

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers

1. After 1929 a generation leapt leftward. Not today. Socialism has been buried (Guardian)

Geoffrey Wheatcroft writes that Europe has witnessed a remarkable shift to the right since the WWII. The Wall Street crash drove a whole generation leftward but the latest financial crisis has only strengthened the right.

2. How Amnesty chose the wrong poster-boy (Times)

David Aaronovitch argues that Amnesty International's partnership with the former Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg and the Muslim group Cageprisoners was a huge misjudgement.

3. Two cheers for the new crying game (Independent)

We should welcome emotional displays such as Alastair Campbell's, writes Steve Richards. They invite voters to consider the human side of politics and the nerve-racking judgements leaders must make.

4. It is too soon for Cameron's Tories to panic (Financial Times)

David Cameron has little to fear from Labour at the election, writes Philip Stephens. The Tories are likely to perform well in the marginals and win a comfortable majority. Cameron's biggest enemy is the incompetence of some of those running his campaign.

5. Tory cuts pave the way for a return to Eighties dole queues (Guardian)

Elsewhere, Polly Toynbee warns that Conservative plans to axe long-term support for the jobless suggest they still think unemployment is a price worth paying.

6. Labour's Puritans should let us live our lives (Financial Times)

Andy Burnham's latest anti-smoking proposals embody the illiberal streak in New Labour, writes Richard Reeves. With its hands full running the economy, the government should abandon its zeal for interfering in personal behaviour.

7. Ukraine is at last throwing off the shackles of the cold war (Independent)

Mary Dejevsky welcomes the way the Ukrainian election was free of outside meddling. Finally, everyone is getting used to the idea of an independent nation.

8. They're all ignoring political climate change (Times)

Rachel Sylvester writes that Labour and the Tories speak the langugage of change, but seem unable to face what that means. David Cameron promises transparency, but not in the case of Lord Ashcroft, and Gordon Brown has failed to support major parliamentary reform.

9. General Election 2010: Trust is in tatters -- and the best we can hope for is transparency (Daily Telegraph)

Mary Riddell says that Cameron's priority appears to be attacking Brown, not constitutional reform. His mockery of Brown's conversion to electoral reform masks the fact that the status quo, which he defends, is worse.

10. A bully and liar who played the system (Times)

Andy Hayman argues that the guilty verdict against Ali Dizaei shows that the police can be less frightened now about dealing with racially sensitive issues.

 

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.

Photo:Getty
Show Hide image

Why isn't Labour putting forward Corbynite candidates?

Despite his successes as a candidate, the organisational victories have gone the way of Corbyn's opponents. 

The contest changes, but the result remains the same: Jeremy Corbyn’s preferred candidate defeated in a parliamentary selection. Afzhal Khan is Labour’s candidate in the Manchester Gorton by-election and the overwhelming favourite to be the seat’s next MP.

Although Khan, an MEP, was one of  the minority of Labour’s European MPs to dissent from a letter from the European parliamentary Labour party calling for Jeremy Corbyn to go in the summer of 2016, he backed Andy Burnham and Tom Watson in 2015, and it is widely believed, fairly or unfairly, that Khan had, as one local activist put it, “the brains to know which way the wind was blowing” rather than being a pukka Corbynite.

For the leader’s office, it was a double defeat;  their preferred candidate, Sam Wheeler, was kept off the longlist, when the party’s Corbynsceptics allied with the party’s BAME leadership to draw up an all ethnic minority shortlist, and Yasmine Dar, their back-up option, was narrowly defeated by Khan among members in Manchester Gorton.

But even when the leadership has got its preferred candidate to the contest, they have been defeated. That even happened in Copeland, where the shortlist was drawn up by Corbynites and designed to advantage Rachel Holliday, the leader’s office preferred candidate.

Why does the Labour left keep losing? Supporters combination of bad luck and bad decisions for the defeat.

In Oldham West, where Michael Meacher, a committed supporter of Jeremy Corbyn’s, was succeeded by Jim McMahon, who voted for Liz Kendall, McMahon was seen to be so far ahead that they had no credible chance of stopping him. Rosena Allin-Khan was a near-perfect candidate to hold the seat of Tooting: a doctor at the local hospital, the seat’s largest employer, with links to both the Polish and Pakistani communities that make up the seat’s biggest minority blocs.  Gillian Troughton, who won the Copeland selection, is a respected local councillor.

But the leadership has also made bad decisions, some claim.  The failure to get a candidate in Manchester Gorton was particularly egregious, as one trade unionist puts it: “We all knew that Gerald was not going to make it [until 2020], they had a local boy with good connections to the trade unions, that contest should have been theirs for the taking”. Instead, they lost control of the selection panel because Jeremy Corbyn missed an NEC meeting – the NEC is hung at present as the Corbynsceptics sacrificed their majority of one to retain the chair – and with it their best chance of taking the seat.

Others close to the leadership point out that for the first year of Corbyn’s leadership, the leader’s office was more preoccupied with the struggle for survival than it was with getting more of its people in. Decisions in by-elections were taken on the hop and often in a way that led to problems later down the line. It made sense to keep Mo Azam, from the party’s left, off the shortlist in Oldham West when Labour MPs were worried for their own seats and about the Ukip effect if Labour selected a minority candidate. But that enraged the party’s minority politicians and led directly to the all-ethnic-minority shortlist in Manchester Gorton.

They also point out that the party's councillor base, from where many candidates are drawn, is still largely Corbynsceptic, though they hope that this will change in the next round of local government selections. (Councillors must go through a reselection process at every election.)

But the biggest shift has very little to do with the Labour leadership. The big victories for the Labour left in internal battles under Ed Miliband were the result of Unite and the GMB working together. Now they are, for various reasons, at odds and the GMB has proven significantly better at working shortlists and campaigning for its members to become MPs.  That helps Corbynsceptics. “The reason why so many of the unions supported Jeremy the first time,” one senior Corbynite argues, “Is they wanted to move the Labour party a little bit to the left. They didn’t want a socialist transformation of the Labour party. And actually if you look at the people getting selected they are not Corbynites, but they are not Blairites either, and that’s what the unions wanted.”

Regardless of why, it means that, two years into Corbyn’s leadership, the Labour left finds itself smaller in parliament than it was at the beginning.  

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to British politics.