Will you put two fingers up to the political "robocallers"?
How to avoid telephone tactics in the run-up to the general election.
By Jason Stamper Published 10 February 2010 17:17
While you may seek cheap thrills from telling political campaigners exactly what you think of their parties, you've got no such capacity when you're hit with a so-called "robocall".
The Labour Party found itself in hot water recently when the Information Commissioner's Office said it had breached privacy rules by making unsolicited automated "robocalls" -- voiced by the Coronation Street star Liz Dawn -- to 495,000 people. But the Lib Dems, the Tories and the SNP have used the gimmick, too.
In the run-up to the election, it's likely these and other telephonic tactics will be on the increase.
But fear not, because help is at hand for those who prefer not to receive their campaigning, unsolicited, down the dog and bone. A new website has been set up by the inventor Steve Smith, who made TV history on Dragon's Den last summer when he received offers from all five Dragons on the show for his trueCall nuisance-call-blocking device.
He's set up thepoliticalcallregister.co.uk. If you register on this site, Smith promises to send your details to the main political parties, asking them not to contact you by phone. If they persist, he's pledges, he will name and shame the culprits.
"This is a growing problem and the parties that do it are worse than cowboy telemarketers," Smith said. "These calls can be made for a penny each, so the politicians can very cheaply flood the country with calls. It is extremely intrusive."
Not everyone will be signing up for the service, mind. Smith's company carried out its own research with MORI in October 2008 and found that although most voters would not be happy if a political party rang them and played a recorded message, a sizable 25 per cent clearly quite like the sound of a political robot's voice.
Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















3 comments
We've been dealing with robocalls here in the USA for the better part of a decade now. They are annoying, and have been used by "interest groups: and canditates alike to spread some very ugly untruths about their opponents. That and they're annoying as all hell.
Unfortunately, there's no stopping them here. Yes, we have "Do Not Call Lists," but they only apply to commercial speech, any law setting up one for these lists for elections robocalls would be thrown out by the courts quicker than you can say "First Amendment."
Thanks Conan. Yes I understand it's much worse in the US, and even more distasteful. In one automated message, people picked up the phone to hear a recording of an unidentified woman sobbing, and talking about an abortion-related incident she claimed she’d had at a women’s health clinic founded by a Democratic congresswoman. Given the choice, I'd definitely rather listen to Corrie’s Liz Dawn.
If they're going to ring you, they should at least do it in person. These automated calls just show contempt for voters. As for that call you mention with the sobbing woman, well, that's just revolting. They really shouldn't have any right to intrude in such a way.