Web Only: the best of the blogs

The five must-read blogs from today, on tax, Steve Hilton and Guantanamo

1. Young and poor among losers of Conservative marriage policy

Over at Left Foot Forward, Will Straw says that the Tory proposal to support marriage through the tax system is likely to be regressive and penalise the young and the poor.

2. Tories in a total tangle on tax

And the right aren't much happier. In the Wall Street Journal blogs, Iain Martin argues that the Tories "frightened of their own shadows" have failed to deliver a clear message on tax.

3. The Steve Hilton Strategy Bulletins

The FT's Westminster blog publishes the emails from Steve Hilton that provoked such disdain from Tory MPs.

4. What happens now to Guantanamo?

Over at Liberal Conspiracy, Andy Worthingon gives us an update on the Obama administration's "stumbling progress" towards closing Guantanamo Bay.

5. Does outdoor advertising make a difference?

PoliticalBetting's Mike Smithson says that, provided they can get their message right, the Tories' bigger budgets should give them the edge over Labour.


Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Why a Labour split may be in the interests of both sides

Divorce may be the best option, argues Nick Tyrone. 

Despite everything that is currently happening within the Labour Party - the open infighting amongst party officials, the threat of MPs being deselected, an increasingly bitter leadership contest between two people essentially standing on the same policy platform – the idea of a split is being talked down by everyone involved. The Labour Party will “come together” after the leadership election, somehow. The shared notion is that a split would be bad for everyone other than the Tories.

Allow me to play devil’s advocate. What the Corbynistas want is a Labour Party that is doctrinarily pure. However small that parliamentary party might be for the time being is irrelevant. The basic idea is to build up the membership into a mass movement that will then translate into seats in the House of Commons and eventually, government. You go from 500,000 members to a million, to two million, to five million until you have enough to win a general election.

The majority of the parliamentary Labour party meanwhile believe that properly opposing the Tories in government through conventional means, i.e. actually attacking things the Conservatives put forth in parliament, using mass media to gain public trust and then support, is the way forward. Also, that a revitalisation of social democracy is the ideology to go with as opposed to a nebulous form of socialism.

These two ways of looking at and approaching politics not only do not go together, they are diametric opposites. No wonder the infighting is so vicious; there is no middle way between Corbynism and the bulk of the PLP.

I understand that the Labour MPs do not want to give up on their party, but I don’t see how the membership is shifting in their favour any time soon. Most talk around a split understandably comes back to 1981 and the SDP very quickly yet consider this: the most defections the SDP ever achieved were 28. If there was a split now, it would probably involve the vast majority of the PLP, perhaps even 80 per cent of it – a very, very different proposition. There is also clearly a large number of people out there who want a centre-left, socially democratic, socially liberal party – and polls suggest that for whatever reason the Liberal Democrats cannot capitalise on this gap in the market. Some sort of new centre-left party with 150+ MPs and ex-Labour donors to kick it off just might.

Of course, a split could be a total disaster, at least in the short term, and allow the Tories further general election victories over the next decade. But let’s be honest here – given where we are, isn’t that going to happen anyhow? And if a split simply results in what happened in the 1980s recurring, thus eventually leading to a Labour Party capable of winning a general election again, would members of the PLP currently wondering what to do next not consider it worth it just for that?

Nick Tyrone is Chief Executive of Radix, the think tank for the radical centre.