The Mrs Robinson affair
Does the fixation with Iris Robinson's psychiatric state reveal social prejudices?
By Charlotte Middlehurst Published 12 January 2010 12:22
It's the kind of story that the tabloids pray for. The affair between Iris Robinson, MP and wife of Peter Robinson (the Northern Ireland Assembly leader), and the then 19-year-old Kirk McCambley has a strong cast of characters: the dying butcher, his strapping son, the powerful statesman and his wayward wife, all brought to their knees. Is it the drama and pathos of a Greek tragedy, or more Jackie Collins?
The temptation to stereotype is almost irresistible. Yet in doing so, society has exposed as much of its own prejudices as the private lives of the protagonists.
So what makes this "scandal" quite so scandalous? Is it the affair or the age difference?
The parallels between the seductive Anne Bancoft's filmic Mrs Robinson and her real-life counterpart are too obvious to avoid. Both are attractive, successful married women in their fifities embarking on illicit affairs with young men.
Yet while Bancroft's glamorous femme fatale character stalked the dreams of a generation of pubescent boys, Iris is all too painfully, embarrassingly, real. She is presented not as a glamorous adulterer, but as an unfaithful wife. Out of control, even deranged, she is in need of urgent psychiatric treatment, and certainly too ill to appear in public or talk to the press. We have had to latch on to her psychological condition in order to stay the shock, and this informs and conditions our understanding of her behaviour.
In a statement to the Today programme, a spokesperson for Peter Robinson announced that his wife was "receiving acute psychiatric treatment from the Belfast Health Trust", and that "the information was being made public following speculation about her health and whereabouts".
I do not doubt that Mrs Robinson has genuinely suffered from depression. What is striking is the centrality of her psychological state to the story. Galen, a prominent physician from the 2nd century, wrote that hysteria was a disease caused by sexual deprivation in particularly passionate women. This "illness" was given particular credence by the Victorians. Two hundred years later, are we subconsciously accusing Mrs Robinson of having the "wandering womb"?
Ugly as it is to admit, had the roles been reversed and a man of equivalent standing been caught playing away with a teenage nymphet, the affair would have been met quite differently. I don't doubt that there would be widespread moral disdain, but there would also be kudos. From Ronnie Wood to Tiger Woods, you do not have to look far for examples.
In this case, Mr Robinson has not emerged unscathed. He too is subject to trial by vox populi. Commenting on Radio 4, Robinson's predecessor, Lord Trimble, pronounced that the First Minister "would be gone in days because he has lost his authority". Faint shades of the Shakespearean cuckold, of the logic that a man who cannot control his household surely cannot be trusted to lead?
So who is the victim? The 19-year-old boy (now 21)? I think not. The cuckolded husband? Perhaps. As for Iris Robinson herself, it is difficult to sympathise with a woman who proudly states that homosexuality is worse than child abuse.
No. Sadly, in this instance, the victim may well be the fragile devolution that Northern Ireland has fought so hard to build.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















8 comments
It's the anti-gay hypocrisy of the slimy Robinsons that makes this story so especially compelling to many.
fed up with the way this has been reported leave hear alone you mack out you are so perfect it make me so sad are you all so inocent
Its the sheer hypocrisy of the Robinsons, the ultra right protestants and the DUP that will result in their ultimate downfall.
iris why did u not have more respect for ur self,and the position u held in goverment,sad woman,i feel sorry for u and ur family
Arrogance, mixed with stupidity and power is a fatal cocktail in those overpromoted in life.
I agree with the general sociological points made here: there is no doubt in my mind that there exists a large disparity in societal attitudes towards sexual behaviour, predicated purely on gender. For once however, I don't think that these attitudes are at play here as to 'what makes this scandal so scandalous.'
Firstly, it is the accompanying corruption that makes Mrs. Robinson's position politically untenable rather than her infidelity, at least technically.
Secondly, as noted above, it’s the hypocrisy of the ultra-moralistic Mrs. Robinson and her party, whose electoral bedrock is the practically fundamentalist Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster. Her comments on homosexuality have to be seen to be believed. And without casting aspersions on the legitimacy of her pyschological condition, I suspect that it's prominence in the communications coming from Mr. Robinson in particular, is a deliberate attempt to keep the media at a certain distance and prevent a feeding frenzy. I also think that perhaps both Sinn Fein and the DUP have ramped this up as they are looking for an excuse - not necessarily with sinister motives - to reassess their implausible coalition.
I think this raises an interesting point regarding how as a society we seem more prepared to forgive infidelity, if people are more open about it - Ronnie Wood, David Letterman etc - than if people have previously projected a squeaky clean image, like Robinson, Tiger Woods or Mark Oaten. It's as if a cheeky personality, or a bit of self-deprecation makes essentially the same act, somehow better. Politicians invariably fall into this latter category and it’s difficult to think of examples of them getting an easy ride, irrespective of gender. Apart from Boris that is, which only further illustrates the point. I actually think that this deep-seated unquenchable thirst for schadenfreude with respect to public figures is a hidden driver for all sorts of contemporary cultural phenomenon, be it reality TV, a celebrity obsessed media and (partially) the erosion of trust in politics. It wasn’t just that MP’s were claiming unlawful expenses, people wanted them to be.
I do however completely agree with the more astute point made here, that there are undertones of the cuckolded husband attitude, in the knock-on impact the affair has had on Mr. Robinson’s political authority.
When someone is in a position of power, the surest bet is that someone else thought he/she was better qualified, more suited, better looking, etc, to lead. And any little chink in the leader's armour will be like a magnet for his/her ambitious underlings to exploit. It's the law of nature. I have seen enough docos about baboons to know how human politics work!
I'm not familiar with the details of how this case has been reported but its about time more was done to criticise the way in which women are portrayed in the media, particularly the tabloids, concerning sexual behaviour. There's always a jokey edge to it when its a mans indiscretion, whereas women are completely vilified. When David Beckham cheated look at how he was potrayed compared to Rebecca Loos, who he cheated with. This issue should be shouted from the rooftops yet you rarely hear todays young women complaining. If anything they are more prepared to conform to their media stereotype. If nothing is done to curb this then how can the slow process of changing societies attitudes begin?