Politics 15 January 2010 Morning Call: pick of the comment The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers Sign up for our weekly email * Print HTML 1. Swine flu was as elusive as WMDs. The real threat is mad scientist syndrome (Guardian) "Remember the warnings of 65,000 dead?" asks Simon Jenkins. Health chiefs should admit they were wrong -- yet again -- about a global pandemic. 2. John Denham's right: It's class, not race, that determines Britain's have-nots (Daily Telegraph) White working-class anger has become a force that no politician can ignore, says Andrew Gilligan. To tackle it, we must talk about it. 3. Race to the bottom (Times) The Times leading article agrees that John Denham was right to say that class matters more for life chances than racial origin. But his statement is a shocking indictment of a failure to enable social mobility. 4. Cameronomics have been tried in Ireland -- and the result? (Independent) Johann Hari looks at the collapse of the Irish model of low tax and almost total deregulation. Following suit by slashing spending would be a disaster, but Labour has not argued the case for Keynsian economics. 5. Liberty and mendacity (Guardian) The Tories pledge to replace the Human Rights Act. Their position just doesn't add up, says Charles Falconer QC, and it puts Britain's reputation at risk. 6. Chilcot inquiry unlikely to find the smoking gun that does for Blair (Daily Telegraph) Former officials' outbursts -- speculative, rather than factual -- have brought us no nearer to knowing the truth about the invasion of Iraq, says Con Coughlin. 7. An Islamic girls' school top of the tables? (Times) The secret of success is the same for all faith schools, says Jack Straw, following the league table success of the Tauheedul Islam school in his Blackburn constituency. 8. Here's one way to reconnect voters (Independent) Andreas Whittam Smith attends a "deliberative poll", a subversive form of political marketing that yields surprising results. 9. The Haiti quake must not be dismissed as an "act of God" (Guardian) Brian Tucker argues that this catastrophe was foreseeable, and suggests that we spend one-tenth of the disaster fund on preparing for future earthquakes. 10. The irresistible rise of the aid industry (Times) Meanwhile, at the Times, Ross Clark worries about the millions who will give money to victims of the earthquake. Will their cash get to the right place? Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter › Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin Subscribe from just £1 per issue More Related articles The problem with Theresa May's Brexit message is that isn't true Is Labour really as doomed as it seems? The polls have got it wrong before If the cuts are necessary, where's Philip Hammond's deficit target gone?