Morning Call: pick of the comment

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers.

1. It's time for Chilcot's team to flex their ageing muscles (Independent)

Armando Iannucci says that today we'll find out whether the Chilcot inquiry is Hutton regenerated, or something capable of fingering the culprits.

2. The real problem was Blair's policy to America, not Iraq (Guardian)

Martin Kettle argues that Tony Blair was not wrong about intervention: it was his political judgement that went badly awry. If only this was Chilcot's focus.

3. Once more unto the breach (Times)

The Times leading article pitches in, too, arguing that while today will be a compelling political spectacle, every conceivable question has already been asked of Blair. More important is the process of government and the war's aftermath.

4. The US is our ally, but we aren't its servant (Daily Telegraph)

It's clearly election season. The Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, writes in the Telegraph that our foreign policy should be designed to serve Britain's national interests, and not beholden to the "special relationship".

5. We can make you behave (Guardian)

The Conservative shadow chancellor, George Osborne, and the Tories' economics adviser Richard Thaler follow suit, setting out their plan to base government policy on behavioural economics.

6. Sri Lanka's destructive feud (Independent)

The acrimonious election campaign did not augur well for a new Sri Lanka, says the leading article. Now President Rajapaksa must move towards genuine inclusion to prevent old tensions from resurfacing.

7. The MMR battle is, sadly, not over (Times)

Nigel Hawkes says that lawyers and journalists are also culpable for the MMR vaccine controversy. The British health system was less effective as than America's in tackling it head-on.

8. Green is the colour of climate discord (Financial Times)

Fiona Harvey argues that green groups and NGOs hinder progress on climate change with their unrealistic demands, and should not be allowed to disrupt the next stage of international talks.

9. This corruption in Washington is smothering America's future (Independent)

"How do you regulate banks effectively, if the Senate is owned by Wall Street?" asks Johann Hari, He takes a look at the power of lobby groups in the US.

10. Hear the rumble of Christian hypocrisy (Times)

Richard Dawkins discusses Pat Robertson's assertion that the Haiti earthquake is punishment for sin, concluding that the evangelist is at least true to his religion.

 

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.

Getty
Show Hide image

Theresa May’s stage-managed election campaign keeps the public at bay

Jeremy Corbyn’s approach may be chaotic, but at least it’s more authentic.

The worst part about running an election campaign for a politician? Having to meet the general public. Those ordinary folk can be a tricky lot, with their lack of regard for being on-message, and their pesky real-life concerns.

But it looks like Theresa May has decided to avoid this inconvenience altogether during this snap general election campaign, as it turns out her visit to Leeds last night was so stage-managed that she barely had to face the public.

Accusations have been whizzing around online that at a campaign event at the Shine building in Leeds, the Prime Minister spoke to a room full of guests invited by the party, rather than local people or people who work in the building’s office space.

The Telegraph’s Chris Hope tweeted a picture of the room in which May was addressing her audience yesterday evening a little before 7pm. He pointed out that, being in Leeds, she was in “Labour territory”:

But a few locals who spied this picture online claimed that the audience did not look like who you’d expect to see congregated at Shine – a grade II-listed Victorian school that has been renovated into a community project housing office space and meeting rooms.

“Ask why she didn’t meet any of the people at the business who work in that beautiful building. Everyone there was an invite-only Tory,” tweeted Rik Kendell, a Leeds-based developer and designer who says he works in the Shine building. “She didn’t arrive until we’d all left for the day. Everyone in the building past 6pm was invite-only . . . They seemed to seek out the most clinical corner for their PR photos. Such a beautiful building to work in.”

Other tweeters also found the snapshot jarring:

Shine’s founders have pointed out that they didn’t host or invite Theresa May – rather the party hired out the space for a private event: “All visitors pay for meeting space in Shine and we do not seek out, bid for, or otherwise host any political parties,” wrote managing director Dawn O'Keefe. The guestlist was not down to Shine, but to the Tory party.

The audience consisted of journalists and around 150 Tory activists, according to the Guardian. This was instead of employees from the 16 offices housed in the building. I have asked the Conservative Party for clarification of who was in the audience and whether it was invite-only and am awaiting its response.

Jeremy Corbyn accused May of “hiding from the public”, and local Labour MP Richard Burgon commented that, “like a medieval monarch, she simply briefly relocated her travelling court of admirers to town and then moved on without so much as a nod to the people she considers to be her lowly subjects”.

But it doesn’t look like the Tories’ painstaking stage-management is a fool-proof plan. Having uniform audiences of the party faithful on the campaign trail seems to be confusing the Prime Minister somewhat. During a visit to a (rather sparsely populated) factory in Clay Cross, Derbyshire, yesterday, she appeared to forget where exactly on the campaign trail she was:

The management of Corbyn’s campaign has also resulted in gaffes – but for opposite reasons. A slightly more chaotic approach has led to him facing the wrong way, with his back to the cameras.

Corbyn’s blunder is born out of his instinct to address the crowd rather than the cameras – May’s problem is the other way round. Both, however, seem far more comfortable talking to the party faithful, even if they are venturing out of safe seat territory.

Anoosh Chakelian is senior writer at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496