Waiting for Blair: the scene outside the Iraq inquiry
It is like a circus as protesters and journalists await Chilcot's star witness.
By Sophie Elmhirst Published 29 January 2010 10:39
Circus-like. That's probably the best way to describe the QEII Centre this morning as we wait for Tony Blair to arrive to give evidence to the Iraq inquiry. Or perhaps more like a Roman amphitheatre, the crowd baying for blood.
But if we're honest, the crowd -- a band of banner-waving protesters -- are far outnumbered by the combination of police and photographers. They're valiantly making as much noise as they can, but hemmed in as they are by the phalanx of officers, parcelled off to the side of the centre, they can't really get much momentum going.
The security is on a different scale from previous days at the inquiry -- to enter the building, you have to pass through endless checks, scans, police and press officers. And that's just to get into the press pen, next to the inquiry room itself, where we'll watch Blair give his evidence on screens. It's a bit like a football match.
Blair, apparently, is already in the building, having left his house before 7am to arrive at the QEII without the scrum that Alastair Campbell faced. There were even decoys, some say -- cars approaching the front of the building while Blair crept in the side entrance.
Other news is that Blair won't make an opening statement or present any kind of document (in Jack Straw style). It will all start, as normal, with a question.
Check in for updates throughout the day . . .
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















3 comments
I support wholeheartedly all the talk about trying to arrest Blair and Bush. But I am amazed that the mainstream media, including the New Statesman, has censored the story about the man in Calgary, AB, Canada who attempted a citizens' arrest on Bush on March 17th 2009. The gentleman's name is Splitting the Sky. He is a Mohawk activist and veteran of the Attica prison debacle. His lawyer is Ramsay Clark. STS will stand trial in March 2010 for “obstructing” the policeman who was protecting Bush in violation of Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes legislation. Why does the New Statesman censor this story? Isn't STS's action much greater than the symbolic gesture of the shoe thrower Muntadhar al-Zaidi? See these links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62a53enMtA0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIj9wGZyWM8
http://www.splittingthesky.net/
You may also take heed of Anthony J. Hall's pertinent analysis: http://www.voltairenet.org/article159233.html#article159233
All that fuss and expense to protect one man - a man who will never admit he made mistakes or that he's responsible for the loss and ruin of so many lives.
Would you like me to borrow you my Spear?