Don't bring back Blair!

Offering Blair an "election role" would be madness

I'm dismayed to read that Tony Blair is set to be given a "key role" in Labour's election campaign. Never mind the politics: I can't bear to hear those glottal stops, the "y'knows" and "kind-ofs" all over again.

The apparent rapprochement between Blair and Gordon Brown was reflected in this bizarre passage in the latter's speech to the Fabians on Saturday (16 January):

In 1997, my predecessor and friend, Tony Blair, said that we had campaigned as New Labour, and would govern as New Labour. Let me say to you today, we have governed as New Labour and now we will campaign as New Labour.

Does Brown not realise how dated such references to "New Labour" make his party appear? Some of the voters Labour needs to win at the election were two years old when the phrase was coined.

In the post-crash world, Blair has no place on the campaign trail. It was he who presided over the reckless decade of casino capitalism that triggered the hangover through which we are now living.

By the time Blair has appeared before the Iraq inquiry and offered another self-serving justification of his role in the invasion, voters are unlikely to be thrilled by a doorstep visit from Tone. His return to Brown's side would further alienate the thousands of anti-war voters Labour needs to win back from the Lib Dems.

To his credit, unlike Thatcher, who haunted her party as a "backseat driver", Blair has so far refused to interfere in Labour's affairs. Let's hope he maintains this position.

 

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

GETTY
Show Hide image

Stephen Hawking's enthusiasm for colonising space makes him almost as bad as Trump

The physicist's inistence on mankind's expansion risks making him a handmaiden of inequality.

“Spreading out may be the only thing that saves us from ourselves,” Stephen Hawking has warned. And he’s not just talking about surviving the UK's recent run of record breaking heat. If humanity doesn’t start sending people to Mars soon, then in a few hundred years he says we can all expect to be kaput; there just isn’t enough space for us all.

The theoretical physicist gave his address to the glittering Starmus Festival of science and arts in Norway. According to the BBC, he argued that climate change and the depletion of natural resources help make space travel essential. With this in mind, he would like to see a mission to Mars by 2025 and a new lunar base within 30 years.

He even took a swipe at Donald Trump: “I am not denying the importance of fighting climate change and global warming, unlike Donald Trump, who may just have taken the most serious, and wrong, decision on climate change this world has seen.”

Yet there are striking similarities between Hawking's statement and the President's bombast. For one thing there was the context in which it was made - an address to a festival dripping with conspicuous consumption, where 18 carat gold OMEGA watches were dished out as prizes.

More importantly there's the inescapable reality that space colonisation is an inherently elitist affair: under Trump you may be able to pay your way out of earthly catastrophe, while for Elon Musk, brawn could be a deciding advantage, given he wants his early settlers on Mars to be able to dredge up buried ice.

Whichever way you divide it up, it is unlikely that everyone will be able to RightMove their way to a less crowded galaxy. Hell, most people can’t even make it to Starmus itself (€800  for a full price ticket), where the line-up of speakers is overwhelmingly white and male.

So while this obsession with space travel has a certain nobility, it also risks elevating earthly inequalities to an interplanetary scale.

And although Hawking is right to call out Trump on climate change, the concern that space travel diverts money from saving earth's ecosystems still stands. 

In a context where the American government is upping NASA’s budget for manned space flights at the same time as it cuts funds for critical work observing the changes on earth, it is imperative that the wider science community stands up against this worrying trend.

Hawking's enthusiasm for colonising the solar system risks playing into the hands of the those who share the President destructive views on the climate, at the expense of the planet underneath us.

India Bourke is an environment writer and editorial assistant at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496