10 reasons I don't want an Apple iPad
Battery life, no USB ports, even the name spells disappointment.
By Jason Stamper Published 28 January 2010 18:57
The much-hyped launch of Apple's new tablet-style computer yesterday has done little to change my belief that it's a solution looking for a problem.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs, in trademark black turtle-neck sweater, said, "iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before."
Creating a new category in the fast-moving electronics industry is no mean feat. Let's not forget that despite its numerous successes, even Apple has not always been able to do that. There were portable music players before the iPod, and smartphones before the iPhone. There weren't many square computers before its G4 Cube, but then that product bombed anyway.
Is the iPad really a brand new category of device?
I fail to see that it is. As we've established, tablet computers have been around for many years. What makes the iPad drastically different? It runs a different operating system (most others run Windows or Linux) and because it's from Apple, integrates well with the likes of Apple's iTunes and its online iBookstore, and can run all the apps than run on the iPhone. That's about the long and short of it.
Apple's says the iPad is a "magical and revolutionary device at an unbelievable price". But who really needs it? iPhone users already have access to the thousands of apps in the Apple App Store (not to mention an existing subscription to a telecoms operator). Anyone with a laptop, notebook or netbook has large-screen portable computing nailed, with the advantage of a folding keyboard that protects the screen from scratches and knocks and is more familiar and faster than the iPad's on-screen touch keyboard.
Much has been made of the argument that it will revolutionise publishing because you can download thousands of books, or read newspapers on it in glorious full colour. Sure, for a few hours. While Apple claims "up to 10 hours" of battery life you're unlikely to see that in real-world situations, especially once you have a number of battery-hungry apps running from the App Store and are using Wi-Fi or 3G connectivity in anger.
Compare battery life to the e-reader competition: the Kindle from Amazon claims the battery will last 7 days from a single charge, while Sony's eReader measures battery life as up to 7,500 continuous page turns. So it's not a direct e-reader competitor, if all you want to do is read digital books on the move.
Anyway here are the top 10 iPad disappointments.
1. The name. iPod may have been cool, but iPad just seems lazy. And it sounds like a sanitary towel.
2. Battery life. "Up to 10 hours" is unlikely to be more than a claim in real-world situations. Turn on wi-fi or 3G and expect to need to charge it twice a day.
3. No keyboard. OK, I know that's sort of the point, but how many people want big-screen portable computing without a real keyboard? Keyboards on notebooks protect the screen, too.
4. No USB ports, and you need to buy a Camera Connection Kit to plug in an SD card to transfer your digital photos from a camera.
5. No camera. That means no video chat or Skype video calling. Some people use such things a lot, I'm reliably informed.
6. The price. The base model without 3G (and hence rather limited on the move) is $499 which will probably actually convert to just under £500 for the UK market. iPods cost more on a like-for-like basis in Europe than the US, and the top spec iPads, at around $850, are going to be pretty expensive compared to the competition if that's the case here.
7. No Adobe Flash support. The supposedly best browsing experience doesn't let you use one of the most popular formats for animation and video on the web.
8. Iffy GPS. There's something called Assisted GPS which relies on Wi-Fi or 3G but there's no built-in GPS receiver.
9. No applications multi-tasking apart from for a few apps that come with the device.
10. The name, again. Oh, and limited operator coverage (currently only on AT&T in the US, no word on UK carriers yet). And the closed application ecosystem. And the likely fragility of the thing. And the potential for the screen to get smeary when you keep touching it. And the fact you will become a target for thieves as early iPod users were. And no high definition video output. And the aspect ratio isn't widescreen. And bright screens are a strain on the eye compared to the digital ink technology of rival e-readers...
I'm sorry, but I still don't quite get it. I clearly don't believe in magic. As I've also said before, people will buy this thing. That's the cult of Mac.
Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















21 comments
You're treating it as a computer in the traditional sense and that's where you've gone wrong
For me it will sit as a touch screen with a great big display so I can easily connect to my favourite web page or play music with a sweep of the fingers and it'll do other things as well
If I want it for traditional computing or word processing etc then I'd use my laptop/desktop etc.
It's multimedia without a mouse and therefore works better for my home entertainment than a traditonal computer
When I'm working I'll use the device that works best
But now I can walk around my house playing my music, browsing and reading, I dont need an inputting device I want a portable browsing device but dont insinuate that the users will all be brand junkies, I dont own an ipod or an iphone but I want one of these
I disagree with you almost every point. I don't think its revolutionary machine, I just think your 'reason not to get one' are pretty weak.
1. iPod is just as silly, but you are used to it. A non point.
2. OK, but this battery is better than you would get from almost any laptop or netbook.
3. The lack of keyboard doesn't restrict the iphone - most people have no problem with the on screen keypad on those.
4. Yes, this is a fair point, but add a USB and users expect everything to work on it - in fact drivers would need to be written for everything you plugged in.
5. Its not a camera, not sure why you think it should be.
6. Yes, it is expensive, but probably good value considering the technology it contains.
7. Not this again - flash is horrible. Its the worst way to display video, its buggy, processor heavy and its often used to deliver ads that nobody wants anyway.
8. GPS is a battery killer. Add that and you'll have no battery AT ALL. Too big to use as a satnav and GPS doesn't work inside anyway - if you are inside you already know where you are.
9. Agreed, it would be nice, but only useful for certain apps - pointless for others.
10. - It comes unlocked - any 3G sim will work.
- 140,000 apps prove you wrong on the 'closed environment'- what exactly is that you think apple is stopping you from doing?
- Yes the greasy hand prints will be annoying, so will scratches and dents but would you rather it was ugly to start with? Treat it with care.
- Widescreen - its not big enough for there to be any benefit to this.
- The screen issue may be a good point but I don't like e-ink screens either.
Here are some better reasons:
1. I already have an iphone that does (almost)all of this.
2. Its too big to carry around without a bag (unlike an iphone that goes everywhere with you)
3. The screen will be hard to read outside (see iphone for details)
4. They charge you for iWork - come on I just spent $500 and you want another $30 for the most useful apps?
Why does NS even pay Stamper's salary? I could have written this for them for free. That out of 10 things to dislike, listing the name twice is not funny; it's just lame. This is the third post in the past month about why a product the guy has never seen in real life (much less used) is only going to be bought by fools who've been commanded to do so by Steve Jobs. Never mind that he could have made a list of the same sort before the iPhone launched ('smartphones with adapted OSs aren't new; there's Windows Mobile', for instance), and it's been bought by over 40m people around the world. Surely not all of those people are the 'cult of the mac'; I'd wager a huge percentage had never touched a Mac in their lives.
It's fair to be sceptical, but this is bordering on obsessive. I'm already dreading the rehash once the thing comes out in March. Please at least give my feed reader a reprieve from the inanity until then.
@ajoke fair enough. No more apple coverage from me for a while!
Now go tell the hypers to stop too!
I think it looks great, it's best thing will be that you can use it to read books and magazines portably in full colour as they should be seen and not restrcited as most e-readers currently are. There will always be naysayers, and while Steve Jobs is not my favourite role model, I think the ipad will find a comforatble niche
@stamper
I haven't seen many hypers actually. From social networking sites, the general reaction seems to be one of confusion, most people don't see the point in it or they just hate Macs anyway. I'm guessing you're in the former category right?
I agree with ajoke, it's close minded to knock it before you've tried it.
I dont have anything against Apple, but I for one, am not fazed by the new product announcement by Steve Jobs. Don't get me wrong, I loved the iPod, but I'm not going to buy the Apple iPad. I would rather buy a laptop, rather than go crazy, rend garments, stand in line and need payday loans to cover buying some plastic trinket I don't need anyway, than get this thing. Tablet PCs aren't new, anyway – and they've never sold well. It isn't the first time someone's tried it. I am just being practical.
So you don't like anyone criticising your precious Apple, fanbois? So someone can only comment on features if they actually have one? How many people then could offer a review of a Lambhorghini? You commenters are so pathetic.
@DudeMamood
No problem with people critising, but this list is lazy nonsense.
See my earlier post for some criticisms that make sense.
Most of the 'reasons' Jason gave are either silly or irrelevant.
I would expect someone who 'reviewed' a Lambhorghini to at least have seen one first hand and hopefully driven one too. I wouldn't expect it to be critcised for not having a large boot, or having a silly name.
@nowtlikehim
1. "a non point". Putting the silly name at #1 was supposed to be a bit of fun, but I'm not the only one who thinks the name is off-putting. Search Twitter for iPad and Bodyform ;-)
2. "this battery is better than you would get from almost any laptop or netbook". Netbooks like the Samsung NC10 have proven battery life of over 7 hours in real-world situations, and they have a larger screen and almost full-sized keyboard. Let's see what battery life the iPad really gets once it's loaded with some apps and being used in anger.
3. "The lack of keyboard doesn't restrict the iphone - most people have no problem with the on screen keypad on those." Yes but that's a phone - you wouldn't expect a large keyboard. On a larger-screen device like the iPad I'd compare it with a netbook, not a phone. Netbooks do have a keyboard.
4. "drivers would need to be written for everything you plugged in" -- ahh gotta love the millions of drivers for the Windows OS eh. I can plug all sorts of devices into a netbook's USB port and they just work. I won't be able to do that with the iPad.
5. "Its not a camera, not sure why you think it should be". I don't think it should be a camera, I think it should have one. Google iPad and "no camera" for all the others who agree it's a shame you won't be able to do video conferencing.
6. maybe
7. "flash is horrible". Your opinion, I disagree.
8. maybe; 9. agreed
10. perhaps; "140,000 apps prove you wrong on the 'closed environment'" -- applications must be approved by Apple before they can go in the App Store. Remember when it decided to ban the Google voice application?
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/apple-is-growing-rotten-to-the-core...
"Yes the greasy hand prints will be annoying, so will scratches and dents but would you rather it was ugly to start with" -- my point is whether I'd want a tablet or a netbook. The netbook form factor protects the screen and gives you room for a keyboard. And you can tilt the screen to get the optimal angle to avoid glare depending on your lighting conditions. I think that's one of the reasons netbooks and notebooks outstripped tablet sales by 80 to 1 last year. Of course, the iPad might change all that.
I didn't say my article was a review. It's my opinion as to why I think it has disadvantages compared to rival devices. No, I haven't played with one yet. But then, neither have you, and you are happy to let us know your opinion?
"1. I already have an iphone that does (almost)all of this." < it really doesn't matter if Apple exclusively sells the iPad to people who *don't* have an iPhone. The market is still easily juicy enough for them.
"2. Its too big to carry around without a bag (unlike an iphone that goes everywhere with you)" < it's not competing with smartphones. You may need a bag for your netbook too, though obviously it has the advantage of a protective case that houses a keyboard, so you may not.
"3. The screen will be hard to read outside (see iphone for details)" < agreed. I already mentioned the advantage of having a keyboard that protects the screen, and it reduces glare too.
"4. They charge you for iWork - come on I just spent $500 and you want another $30 for the most useful apps?" < agreed, a bit mean of them
@Alec "I haven't seen many hypers actually" Really? Before the launch, it was predicted to revolutionise the publishing industry, the games industry, the laptop market, software development and the e-reader market.
Don't believe me?
The Guardian asked in a headline whether it will kill off TV: "Will the Apple iPad eat your TV?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/pda/2010/jan/28/apple-ipad-tv
Silicon.com asked if Apple was "preparing a tablet to kill all laptops"
http://www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2010/01/21/peter-cochranes-bl...
No hype then.
I don't hate Macs at all. I have one. I like it. I'm questioning the market for this new tablet device. I'm questioning the level of hype, too. I could be wrong, of course.
Jason, you already gave your opinion and you can't convince me by repetition, sorry, no sale. Come back when you've actually used one.
DudeMahmood, why the insult? I am reminded of an old saying, Be careful as what you say reflects how you yourself truly are
@toa I wasn't talking to you actually, I was responding to another commenter. Thanks.
Jason - Fair enough - I agree that the positioning of this is unclear - too big to replace a smart phone, not 'computery' enough to replace a laptop. I guess that people who may be thinking of buying this will already have both.
Hello,
Have your loan transferred to you at a confident access! Offer is available at very affordable interest rate of 0.6% within fastest duration. Our means of transferring your loan will not be a problem as we adopt with new banking systems that allows you have your loan funds the same day through bank to bank wiring process for your comfort.
Offer available for both personal and company loans for your investment plans.
If you are interested as a person or persons, please contact us today via company email : totallymoneyloan@aol.com, to get started with the calculations of your loan terms and conditions...
I love my new Ipad. Its only $500 people, use it for what it does and not bash it for what it doesnt
The iPad is revolutionizing tablet computing as much as the iPhone revolutionized smartphones, and for the same reasons. And those reasons seemed like easily-ignored details several years ago too.
When the iPhone came out, there were already several smartphones with big touchscreens. But the iPhone was a revolution for several reasons: its small size and weight, its glass capacitive touchscreen instead of a plastic resistive screen, and its UI which allowed effective operation by touch instead of stylus.
History is repeating itself now, writ large. The tablet computers that you point out already exist suffer from exactly the same problems as the pre-iPhone touchscreen smartphones. They are bigger and heavier (3-5 lbs vs. 1.5 lbs) and they have plastic resistive touchscreens that must be operated by stylus in order to effectively use Windows.
I have no doubt that many operations, e.g., basic web surfing and e-mail, will be far superior on an iPad vs. an existing Windows-based tablet.
But while everybody "needs" a cell phone, so they might as well get an iPhone, there is no equally compelling reason why people might "need" a tablet computer, even if it does offer much better usability than current models.
@jason - shame on you for not recognizing that it makes an excellent learner's snowboard...Given we're in the ski-ing season that at least has got to be a redeeming feature. Especially at the price point (lol)
Hi Dennis; excellent idea: '10 alternative uses for an Apple iPad' (in pictures). I'm working on it now ;-)
Hola,
¿Está usted en busca de un préstamo de fiar? ¿Cansado de búsqueda de préstamos e hipotecas? ¿Ha sido rechazado por sus bancos? Luego, el trauma financiero es más!
Aquí es un prestamista legítimo que le garantiza de una manera rápida y servicios de préstamos asequibles sin estrés. La oferta está disponible a una tasa de interés del 4% sin preocuparse de su cheque de crédito, pero con una tasa de asequibilidad tramo considerable.
Los interesados pueden contactar con nosotros a través de nuestro correo de la empresa: progressivelender@gmail.com para su préstamo cita como también aplicar las mejores abril para el cálculo de los términos y condiciones de préstamos para satisfacer sus pagos.
Nos ofrecen préstamos de $ 5,000.00 € £ $ € £ Min.to 50,000,000.00 Max.at rate.We interés del 4% son certificados y de confianza. nosotros le podemos ayudar con la asistencia financiera. Una vez más, si está interesado por favor póngase en contacto con nosotros hoy a través de correo electrónico Email: progressivelender@gmail.com.
Firmado,
Gestión.
OFERTA
A completely stupid device... its just a fashion statement if anything. Its really not competition for any other device... so the makers and supporters say "Oh, thats because its a revolutionary new device" but i say "That we didnt need."