Morning Call: pick of the comment

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers

1. A Lib-Lab pact: deep down they know it makes sense (Guardian)

John Harris says that a Labour-Lib Dem agreement is the only way to prevent a Tory government that would "attempt the revival of just about everything that has been so discredited".

2. Don't waste your money on an early election (Times)

Daniel Finkelstein argues that with Labour still only on a poll average of 30 per cent, Gordon Brown would be foolish to call an early election in March.

3. It's the protesters who offer the best hope for our planet (Independent)

Johann Hari praises the Copenhagen protesters for ensuring that the corporate lobbyists attempting to block an agreement have been exposed.

4. Britain's dismal choice: how to share the losses (Financial Times)

Martin Wolf says that Alistair Darling has shied away from exploring the full implications of the UK's poorer position. The question now is how to share the losses without damaging the vulnerable.

5. Britain needs the Bomb? That was the last war (Times)

Roy Hattersley calls on the government to abandon the £20bn Trident renewal and use the money saved to finance Britain's new world role -- "peacekeeping, conflict resolution and fighting bushfires".

6. Obama is not saviour of the world. He's still an American president (Guardian)

Jonathan Freedland says that environmental campaigners must remember the "multiple ball-and-chains" around Barack Obama's ankle that weaken his negotiating position.

7. Livni has no right to claim immunity from prosecution (Independent)

Sir Geoffrey Bindman argues that the former Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni has no claim to "diplomatic immunity" in an age of universal jurisdiction.

8. Innumerate bankers were ripe for a reckoning (Financial Times)

Martin Taylor, the former chief executive of Barclays, says that reckless bankers who based their calculations on "imaginary wealth" deserved to be punished.

9. Silvio Berlusconi: Politics alla puttanesca (Guardian)

A leader in the paper argues that Berlusconi's plan to crack down on critical websites is illegitimate and a "response reminiscent of a central Asian republic". World leaders should distance themselves from the Italian prime minister, it concludes.

10. Students can't afford to be cash cows (Daily Telegraph)

Lauren Cheshire says that the government's treatment of students as "consumers" risks turning bastions of learning into "corporate machines".

Show Hide image

The Women's March against Trump matters – but only if we keep fighting

We won’t win the battle for progressive ideas if we don’t battle in the first place.

Arron Banks, UKIP-funder, Brexit cheerleader and Gibraltar-based insurance salesman, took time out from Trump's inauguration to tweet me about my role in tomorrow's Women’s March Conservative values are in the ascendancy worldwide. Thankfully your values are finished. . . good”.

Just what about the idea of women and men marching for human rights causes such ill will? The sense it is somehow cheeky to say we will champion equality whoever is in office in America or around the world. After all, if progressives like me have lost the battle of ideas, what difference does it make whether we are marching, holding meetings or just moaning on the internet?

The only anti-democratic perspective is to argue that when someone has lost the argument they have to stop making one. When political parties lose elections they reflect, they listen, they learn but if they stand for something, they don’t disband. The same is true, now, for the broader context. We should not dismiss the necessity to learn, to listen, to reflect on the rise of Trump – or indeed reflect on the rise of the right in the UK  but reject the idea that we have to take a vow of silence if we want to win power again.

To march is not to ignore the challenges progressives face. It is to start to ask what are we prepared to do about it.

Historically, conservatives have had no such qualms about regrouping and remaining steadfast in the confidence they have something worth saying. In contrast, the left has always been good at absolving itself of the need to renew.

We spend our time seeking the perfect candidates, the perfect policy, the perfect campaign, as a precondition for action. It justifies doing nothing except sitting on the sidelines bemoaning the state of society.

We also seem to think that changing the world should be easier than reality suggests. The backlash we are now seeing against progressive policies was inevitable once we appeared to take these gains for granted and became arrogant and exclusive about the inevitability of our worldview. Our values demand the rebalancing of power, whether economic, social or cultural, and that means challenging those who currently have it. We may believe that a more equal world is one in which more will thrive, but that doesn’t mean those with entrenched privilege will give up their favoured status without a fight or that the public should express perpetual gratitude for our efforts via the ballot box either.  

Amongst the conferences, tweets and general rumblings there seem three schools of thought about what to do next. The first is Marxist  as in Groucho revisionism: to rise again we must water down our principles to accommodate where we believe the centre ground of politics to now be. Tone down our ideals in the hope that by such acquiescence we can eventually win back public support for our brand – if not our purpose. The very essence of a hollow victory.

The second is to stick to our guns and stick our heads in the sand, believing that eventually, when World War Three breaks out, the public will come grovelling back to us. To luxuriate in an unwillingness to see we are losing not just elected offices but the fight for our shared future.

But what if there really was a third way? It's not going to be easy, and it requires more than a hashtag or funny t-shirt. It’s about picking ourselves up, dusting ourselves down and starting to renew our call to arms in a way that makes sense for the modern world.

For the avoidance of doubt, if we march tomorrow and then go home satisfied we have made our point then we may as well not have marched at all. But if we march and continue to organise out of the networks we make, well, then that’s worth a Saturday in the cold. After all, we won’t win the battle of ideas, if we don’t battle.

We do have to change the way we work. We do have to have the courage not to live in our echo chambers alone. To go with respect and humility to debate and discuss the future of our communities and of our country.

And we have to come together to show there is a willingness not to ask a few brave souls to do that on their own. Not just at election times, but every day and in every corner of Britain, no matter how difficult it may feel.

Saturday is one part of that process of finding others willing not just to walk a mile with a placard, but to put in the hard yards to win the argument again for progressive values and vision. Maybe no one will show up. Maybe not many will keep going. But whilst there are folk with faith in each other, and in that alternative future, they’ll find a friend in me ready to work with them and will them on  and then Mr Banks really should be worried.