Blacking up: nope, it's still not funny
Tory MP asks why it is offensive to black up in one-man mission against political correctness
By Samira Shackle Published 21 December 2009 17:12
At the weekend, it emerged that Philip Davies, the Tory MP for Shipley, has been haranguing the Equality and Human Rights Commission on a self-proclaimed fight against political correctness.
Since April last year, he has sent 19 letters, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
The question that really caught the imagination of the press was this: "Is it offensive to black up or not, particularly if you are impersonating a black person?" In a postscript to this letter, he adds: "Why it is so offensive to black up your face, as I have never understood this."
Wow. Where to begin?
The (obviously very good-humoured) commission had yet to reply in writing to this query, but in the meantime, a spokesman said: "There are many writings produced by scholars about blacking up, arguing that minstrel shows lampoon black people in derogatory ways, and many people clearly find blacking up to portray minstrels or black people offensive."
It's true, Davies's question displays a certain ignorance: impersonating a black person is offensive because it is so fraught with history. Blacking up is mockery, and it's dehumanising, with its symbolism of a grinning, infantilised rascal dancing around for the amusement of others.
This is not the first time blacking up and the Tories have met. There was controversy in 2007 when a Tory councillor dressed up as "Nelson Mandela" -- yes, complete with skin colour -- for a fancy-dress party. The councillor defended the decision as a piece of "harmless fun". Hmm.
There was outcry this year over a fashion shoot in French Vogue that featured a white model blacked up. "It's horrible, there's nothing else to describe it. The image says we'd rather turn a European model white than hire a black model," Nana A Tamakloe, who manages models, said at the time.
Davies's query relates to a practice that is pretty much non-existent anyway: it's a deliberately provocative and pointless piece of questioning. It is another mockery, but luckily he seems to have made himself the butt of the joke.
According to the Guardian, he also asked:
- Whether the Metropolitan Black Police Association breaches discrimination law by restricting its membership to black people. He compared this to the BNP's whites-only policy, which the far-right party has now agreed to change.
- Whether the women-only Orange Prize for fiction discriminates against men.
- Whether it was racist for a policeman to refer to a BMW as "black man's wheels".
- Whether it was lawful for an advert for a job working with victims of domestic violence to specify that applicants had to be female and/or black or from an ethnic minority.
- Whether a "Miss White Britain" competition or a "White Power List" would be racist, after Phillips justified the existence of Miss Black Britain prizes and the Black Power List. "Is there any difference legally or morally than publishing a white list [sic]? Do you think this entrenches division?"
- Whether anti-discrimination laws ought to be extended "to cover bald people (and perhaps fat people and short people)".
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















10 comments
Why the Conservative party allow people as stupid and as racist as this to remain in the party I do not know!
@BrightlySprightly
Sorry but while many on the right are racist many people on the left will be upset or "po faced" as you put it.
Re: dressing up as Nelson Mandela (and blacking up). Harry Enfield (impeccably left wing) did this a few times in the last series of 'Harry and Paul.' And he was very funny. Now I know what you're saying here against Philip Davies, but couldn't this look like one rule for us and another for them?
But wouldn't the point with Harry Enfield be that he was actually being funny - ie. the humour arose from his impression, in the same way that an impression of Tony Blair is funny. I think the point here isn't about white peopel being able to take the piss out of balck people but about arbitrarily defending the practice of blacking up which, if it is ITSELF the sum of the joke - eg. the only funny thing about the councillor in question was his blacked up face - is offensive and not funny.
That's just my undertsandnig though, i might be wrong
Sorry, lots of typos.
Also with the Tory councillor I mean "supposedly funny"
As I recall, the model who got into trouble for 'blacking up' was actually using a pitch-black skin tone (which no human has) as opposed to a brown realistic skin colour. I didn't see what the fuss was about at the time as there didn't seem to be negative racial untertones. I find the concept of fashion, modelling and Vogue far more offensive as a whole than that one particular incident.
@BryDoolittle - no, the fashion shoot wasn't a pitch-black colour, it was a realistic skin tone. Also the shoot was all exotic headscarfs and ethnic silks - very racially suggestive. I think that's why people were saying that they could of just used a black model. The other thing was that there wasn't any black models ANYWHERE else in the magazine - not even in a run down of top supermodels.
look at the G2 article linked to in the blog above
Sigh. Why must the left be so po-faced about everything? Lighten up.
Although - I'm not sure Davies was trying to be funny, anyway.
it doesn't matter why its offensive.
it just is.
end of.
i don't see why any more discussion is needed. this man is obviously a tosser.
My, my. Not so cuddly Tories, eh!
It all depends on the context - i.e I am going to an 80's fancy dress party and going as MC Hammer, in no way am I (or would I ever) take the micky out of anyones colour however I would and will be taking the micky out of his ridiculous dress sense as will other party goers.