Return to: Home | Blogs | The God Blog

An ape on a cross and a black Jesus

Will Christians find these works blasphemous?

The Privilege of Dominion. Credit: The Age of Marvellous

The contemporary art world is descending on London in time for the opening of the Frieze Art Fair in Regent's Park on Wednesday. It will be interesting to see how much reaction there is to two works in a show timed to coincide with it, "The Age of Marvellous", which is on at a deconsecrated church opposite the park. One of the artists, Paul Fryer, caused controversy this year when his Pietà, a sculpture of Christ in an electric chair, was displayed in the cathedral of the Alpine town of Gap. Now he has taken this further in another work, in which the Christ figure is black and appears contorted and visibly suffering.

"The figure of Christ isn't just in the electric chair," explains Fryer, who has collaborated with Damien Hirst and whose work has been exhibited at the Tate and the Courtauld. "He's starved and he's black. Hundreds more black people have been executed in the chair than white people. More black people starve to death than white people by what you could call a significant margin, too." The work also makes the point that "we still execute people 2,000 years after Christ's death".

More edgy -- more likely to offend, at any rate -- is The Privilege of Dominion, in which a waxwork ape appears nailed to a cross. "At the rate we're killing them all, the lowland gorillas will be dead by the year 2020," says Fryer. "Do animals have souls? What a question. We should be asking the same question of ourselves."

Personally, I don't find either sacrilegious. But then perhaps that's not for me to say. Given that the clearly fantastical Jerry Springer: the Opera managed to arouse the ire of so many Christians, it's quite possible that Fryer's ape on a cross will provoke more than just thought.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

PM-elect
12 October 2009 at 14:31

Try depicting Mohammed then you cowards!

TJ_Lives
12 October 2009 at 16:38

The Alpine town of Gap? Would that be Garmisch-Partenkirchen?

Don't be silly, PM-elect. It's not fashionable to lampoon Islam or for Richard Dawkins to give lectures in Mecca. Somebody might get hurt! Best to play it safe and attempt to portray what is in fact docile conformity for courageous dissent.

brad evans
13 October 2009 at 02:11

I'm an atheist and I find these works too boring to be offensive.

Not to say that most artists aren't posers trying for cheap laughs to get grant money, only that 99% of them aren't worth the cost of the bullet

But I hope they do feel free to lampoon Mohammad ibn Abdullah sometime soon. Watching 'progressives' run for cover during the Danish cartoon flap was hilarious.

Luddite.
13 October 2009 at 06:09

Just three comment's all dismissive another victory for Christ. NOW!! try putting the good prophet Mohammed on the cross and see the reaction from the religion of peace.

toby forward
13 October 2009 at 08:49

As far as I can see, without having seen the works themselves, I don't think they're particularly good art, nor are they profound thought. The sort of thing you might expect from a bright(ish) fifth form art student. But the point they make, though not specially wise, is worthmaking. I don't find the pieces offensive or blasphemous. The image of Christ in the electric chair was, I think, better. But to use the symbolism of the cross in this way is not bad in itself, if a little cheap.

There is, though, the other point about whether the same artist would consider using Muslim imagery to make a similar point. After all, plenty of savage things are legally sanctioned in the Islamic world. If he wants to go down this road then I would like to see him balance his output by using images from different religions (specifically Islam) in the way he has used Christian iconography. That would at least give him the opportunity to prove that he is not parochial in his attacks, nor frightened not only of giving offence, but of actual reprisals. Otherwise, I'm afraid he's open to the charges of cowardice and flippancy.

Daniele
17 October 2009 at 00:34

Who cares if these pieces are offensive to Christians? What happened to the good old "freedom of speech" that everybody want to give the BNP? So it is "freedom of speech" AS LONG AS it does not offend the "deluded"?

Christians and Muslims offend me all the time but I am called a "fanatical, fundamentalist atheist" if I mention it.

brad evans
18 October 2009 at 21:35

Daniele, freedom of speech is terrific. Get a First Amendment in the UK of GB and NI and you'll be amazed that you managed to live without it for so long.

Abdul
21 October 2009 at 11:34

According to Islam jesus is one of the best massengers that has ever been sent by god and beleiving in him and loving him ( as a prophet) is a essential in islam. I regard anything that portrays him ,or indeed any other prophet e.g Moses, in a bad way exteremely offending.

However i don`t reagrd The Privilege of Dominion offensive. Islam teaches that Jesus was never crucified but indeed was raised to the heaven ( where he will descend from later).

It is not muslims` fault that people are taking the "piss" at christianity.it is just that Muslims care about their religion; the mass majority of christians don`t. And artist know that. So when you see things like this happening don`t just say in despeartion " dare you do it to Islam" but think : WHY ?

dominic
23 October 2009 at 18:05

To traduce 7/8s of the world religions through artistic license and leave islam untouched isn't daring, innovative or edgy. It's Islamist.

Absentee Christian
26 October 2009 at 04:30

dominic, the reason everyone uses the cross is simple: everyone understands the cross. The cross is a visible symbol that is easily, if I may use the word, parodied. Islam has no such symbol. The star and crescent? Try using that in art. The five pillars? Not a visible symbol. There is no real visible, easily parodied symbol of Islam the way there is for Christianity. The tallest tree IS the first to be cut down.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Who are you calling anti-Semitic?

17 November 2009 17:43

A giant leap forward for Muslim women

11 November 2009 17:23

Goldmans boss says he does "God's work"

09 November 2009 10:07

"Jesus was a leftie"

06 November 2009 17:37

It's official: faith in science is a belief

04 November 2009 15:43

Cameron on Blair and Europe

28 October 2009 10:53

Jewish: or just Jew-ish?

27 October 2009 12:30

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker