Return to: Home | Blogs | The Faith Column

Islam and feminism

In the third of our series on faith and feminism, Asma Barlas writes about the message of sexual equality in the Qur'an

I have been asked to write about how feminism informs my understanding of faith and if and how faith influences my feminist views. I’ve discussed the intersection between Islam and feminism many times before and every time I have clarified that I do not like to call myself a feminist; yet, the label continues to stick!

The truth is that long before I learned about feminism, I had begun to glimpse a message of sexual equality in the Qur’an. Perhaps this is paradoxical given that all the translations and interpretations that I read growing up were by men and given that I was born and raised in Pakistan, a society that can hardly be considered egalitarian. Yet, the Qur’an’s message of equality resonated in the teaching that women and men have been created from a single self and are each other’s guides who have the mutual obligation to enjoin what is right and to forbid what is wrong.

But, then, there are those other verses that Muslims read as saying that men are better than women and their guardians and giving men the right to unfettered polygyny and even to beat a recalcitrant wife. To read the Qur’an in my youth was thus to be caught up in a seemingly irresolvable and agonizing dilemma of how to reconcile these two sets of verses not just with one another but also with a view of God as just, consistent, merciful, and above sexual partisanship.

It has taken the better part of my life to resolve this dilemma and it has involved learning (from the discipline of hermeneutics) that language--hence interpretation—is not fixed or transparent and that the meanings of a text change depending on who interprets it and how. From reading Muslim history, on the other hand, I discovered that Qur’anic exegesis became more hostile to women only gradually and as a result of shifts in religious knowledge and methodology as well as in the political priorities of Muslim states. And, from feminism, I got the language to speak about patriarchy and sexual equality. In other words, it was all these universes of knowledge that enabled me to encounter the Qur’an anew and to give voice to my intuition that a God who is beyond sex/ gender has no investment in favoring males or oppressing women either.

Most Muslims, however, are unconvinced by this argument and it may be because viewing God’s speech (thus also God) as patriarchal allows the conservatives to justify male privilege and many progressive Muslims to advocate for secularism on the grounds that Islam is oppressive. As for me, I continue to respond to the Qur’an’s call to use my reason and intellect to decipher the signs (ayat) of God. Thus far, such an exercise has only brought me to more liberatory understandings of the text itself.

Asma Barlas is professor of Politics and director of the Center for the Study of Culture, Race, and Ethnicity at Ithaca College, New York.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

benjamin hayes
20 October 2009 at 17:15

im sorry that you feel that way, due to misunderstanding on both sexes. men are the gaurdians of women in a normal sense, but this is not always the case, but most of the time it is. you see. in all actuality weman just dont want to except this at all. what if a man and a woman work eight hours a day with 2 kids? how will the child know what true unconditional love is? answer is ,they wont know. they will make there own understanding of the world and go thru hell before they reach heaven. its sad that weman will basically throw away there maternal instinct at the price of material things.and it is materialism at its lowest. because if a man is working and supporting the family, why must women go to great length to do the same? its because they dont care about there kids, there kids just make them feel decent in a sense. they care more about the things they see on tv, and the things they here from there freinds, and a lust for money is the root of it all. because if money wasnt in the form of paper, and you had to work for basic nasessities woman would not dare to ingage in strenues work. instead woman dont want basics, they want the world and thats it. why do u think that fornication in woman is so prevalent. its because the men said "okay" u can have ur share and help out and be like men. but they did not just want to help out they wanted to have the ability to fornicate and destroy themselves . thus we get the phrase" girls just wanna have fun" weman are more aragant then ever and its because we make everything appeal to there enjoyment and thats not fair for men. when there just playing man and the real man has his honor and dignity to uphold in the world.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

After the truth

29 May 2009 10:09

Islam's young faithful

18 May 2009 17:33

The Pilgrim Pope

14 May 2009 10:53

Technology, the Latter-day way

12 May 2009 09:45

The Age of the E-church

07 May 2009 12:43

Christianity and the Petri dish

06 May 2009 11:48

Judaism and charity

30 April 2009 16:07

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker