Return to: Home | Blogs | The Faith Column

Compassion during the crisis

Compassion for all - including bankers and politicians - will help society weather the economic crisis and learn to prize equality and sustainability, says Buddhist Matthew Jee.

Buddhist monks outside a Scottish monastery.

The Buddha was an ordinary human being who lived a remarkable life. An Indian prince, he gave up everything in search of the truth. The truths he discovered speak to us across all cultures and ages. He discovered and taught that human dissatisfaction is caused by three “root poisons” of the mind: greed, ignorance and anger. The Buddha also taught that we can move beyond these poisons and wake up to reality. In fact the word Buddha means “one who is awake”.

We can see how greed and ignorance have contributed to current economic conditions. Recent events in the financial markets and economy have undoubtedly been a “wake up call”. People are suffering from financial losses and from uncertainty and fear. A new reality is dawning and it has been a shock. The Regan-Thatcher years are dead due to the widespread acceptance that unchecked markets do not best serve us.

During those years people were encouraged towards selfish greed. Bankers became greedy for profits and became more creative about making money from nothing - inventing new financial schemes, mortgage products and ways of “offsetting” risk. The result of these developments? A full blown asset price bubble followed by the inevitable bust: collapsing asset prices, mortgage foreclosure, unemployment and business bankruptcy. It is clear no risks were offset, merely swept under the carpet until the world economy tripped over it.

Wisdom cuts through ignorance. The last three hundred years or so has seen mankind develop a wealth of knowledge and skills to manipulate our environment. Knowledge and skills are not wisdom though - indeed they can be applied in unwise ways. From today's economic situation it is clear that financial skills and knowledge have been applied in unwise ways.

It is not only a short term lack of wisdom that troubles us. This world has finite resources and for a long time lone voices have been pointing out the impossibility of permanent compound economic growth. The ecology movement has grown up during the last forty five years or so and has cohered to become politically influential. Unfortunately, despite the efforts of international institutions, the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer - and the environment continues to degrade.

These issues need to be addressed and slowly the economic paradigm is shifting. We need now to develop the wisdom to use our knowledge and skills properly. We must learn to live in a peaceful and sustainable way. This will demand the development of a new economics based on “simplicity, need and sufficiency” and not on “complexity, greed and power”. It will involve massive social, economic and financial change. It will take time.

For these reasons we need to develop compassion not just for the starving, but for the super-rich, bankers and politicians too, because if we are to solve the underlying ecological and economic issues – which can not be separated - these people will be experiencing more change than any of us.

Matthew Jee is a former stockbroker, merchant banker and financial publisher. In 1997 he left the world of finance and worked on a Kibbutz in Israel. Two years later he became a Buddhist under his Tibetan Master, The Venerable Khandro Rinpoche. Matthew now writes under the pseudonym “The Irreverent Buddhist” and is the owner of a non-sectarian internet discussion forum for meditators.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

18 comments from readers

FreedomLand
20 November 2008 at 05:30

Carl Jones, has that anti-'twitter' from Ben's Blog been at it again, uhh? This maximum 2000 characters business is a real nuisance, too. We're NOT writing in Chinese!

You are not really able to comprehend "Khandro Rinpoche's Tough Love", Mathew Jee, and I hardly think you would actually be able of contemplating her as a future Dalai Lama - even though that is exactly what Tibetan Buddhism now needs.....

"She is demanding of her students and uncompromising about the dharma, and she is a rarity—a prominent Tibetan teacher who is a woman. Trish Deitch Rohrer experiences the provocative and challenging Khandro Rinpoche..." http://www.shambhalasun.com/index.php?option=content&task=vi...

By the way, I AM the real FreedomLand here despite your allusions to "freedom" on your site, Mathew Jee. LOL

FreedomLand
20 November 2008 at 05:31

But compassion does come into everything is society is to survive, though, Carl Jones. No matter how experienced and how clever you are, when you drive a car you inevitably discover that your survival depends as much on the cautiousness and deference of other drivers as upon your own skills. Good karma, good results.

Thus the winners and losers mentality in commerce and in politics is leading us all to disaster. Perhaps getting rid of politicians and CEO's who perfer self-aggrandizement and the Machiavellian "great game" would be wise, though? It is certainly not a matter of excusing them and simply slapping them on the wrist - and they do need to be "...experiencing more change...." by being sacked and finding out for themselves what it is like. This is also KARMA.

Perhaps, as an ex-stockbroker and merchant banker, Matthew Jee is looking to excuse his fellow colleagues though, just as his website excuses rank Tibetan nationalism for the real issues what has been happening in Tibet? I don't see him espousing "compassion" for the Chinese, uhh.

So hypocritical, too, that Matthew Jee says "Unfortunately, despite the efforts of international institutions, the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer - and the environment continues to degrade...". This is utter crap and he knows that it IS as a result of "the efforts of international institutions" that these problems occur and persist.

Wisdom cuts through ignorance..... and it is apparent that drifting from an Israeli kibbutz to a Tibetan supposedly Buddhist Western ashram does little to enlighten the mind ("Her Eminence" Jetsün Khandro Rinpoche), especially for those still effectively lost in the material world.

Khandro Rinpoche - about Karma http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HMP_xVJFss

Matthew_Jee
20 November 2008 at 12:04

Dear Freedomland,

That's quite a rant (the bits that make sense at least). You seem to be very angry for some reason I do not quite understand.

The only thing I will comment on is that you really have no basis upon which to judge the relationship between my teacher and myself.

Matthew Jee

FreedomLand
20 November 2008 at 14:22

"You seem to be very angry..."

I spoke about (a) compassion, and (b) karma. I do not quite understand why you interpret that as anger, Matthew_Jee. Both are topics your teacher relates quite well to herself. But, for some reason, you have accused me of a "rant", uhh. Why?

Matthew_Jee
20 November 2008 at 15:25

"Carl Jones, has that anti-'twitter' from Ben's Blog been at it again, uhh? This maximum 2000 characters business is a real nuisance, too. We're NOT writing in Chinese! "

I call it a rant because the first thing you do is complain you will need more than 2000 characters.

The article is less than 500 words - a similar length to the space for replies.

"You are not really able to comprehend "Khandro Rinpoche's Tough Love", Mathew Jee, and I hardly think you would actually be able of contemplating her as a future Dalai Lama - even though that is exactly what Tibetan Buddhism now needs..... "

The extent to which I understand and am understood by my root guru is between Khandroma and myself. In private interviews we have established that.

The above statement seems angry, judgemental and full of assumptions about me and my ability to comprehend and "what Tibetan Buddhism now needs"..

"By the way, I AM the real FreedomLand here despite your allusions to "freedom" on your site, Mathew Jee. LOL"

This seems very egotistic.

"Perhaps getting rid of politicians and CEO's who perfer self-aggrandizement and the Machiavellian "great game" would be wise, though? It is certainly not a matter of excusing them and simply slapping them on the wrist - and they do need to be "...experiencing more change...." by being sacked and finding out for themselves what it is like. This is also KARMA. "

This seems very angry.

"Perhaps, as an ex-stockbroker and merchant banker, Matthew Jee is looking to excuse his fellow colleagues though, just as his website excuses rank Tibetan nationalism for the real issues what has been happening in Tibet?"

My piece makes it clear that greed in the financial industry has been a major causal factor in the current economic situation developing. Hardly an attempt to "excuse" my former colleagues.

I do not lack compassion for the Chinese. In the article I am espousing compassion for all.

"This is utter crap"

This seems angry.

An angry rant Indeed. MJ

Carl Jones
20 November 2008 at 21:38

Well, there are a lot of references to ME, but I have been censored and I have no idea why?

The key here is "compassion" and its a very highly rated human trait. I made no reference to religion and I made no personal attack on MJ, apart from this STRANGE idea that a bunch of crooks deserve compassion.

Before compassion come RESPECT, our leaders, regulators and financial elite have failed the world through blatant criminality....theu have shown us (the global village), NO RESPECT, so the idea that we should be flowing with compassion is a sick joke.

Wealth and power brings responsibilty, now its time for the establishment to pay up, some with their live, some with their freedom.

Out of the Great Depression came the Glass-Steagall Act, it was inacted for a reason and for some STRANGE reason, it was repealed just 8 days after Bush won his first FIXED election.

MJ needs to seriousely look deep within, so he can

eject the posion that still lurks within his mind.

gnuneo
21 November 2008 at 00:55

Matthew Jee, from the apparently boundless greed of the bankers came the current collapse, that has created the conditions - finally - of moving beyond a feudal structure that kept wealth and power to a small minority.

from the apparently boundless narcissism and power-hunger of politicians, has come the realisation of many in western societies that they are living in somewhat less than actual democracies, and that fundamental rights and freedoms are under enormous danger.

from the boundless compassion and Dhamma of the Universe/Individual, we can find it in ourselves to thank these people for so highlighting the exigent problems within our societies and inter-relationships, allowing a correction to take place.

i thank you for your article, and the humanity within it.

xx

FreedomLand
21 November 2008 at 15:10

#gnuneo, despite your failure to take your own advice from a comment in a previous topic (World saved . . . planet doomed - "shut up for a few days..."), you have actually managed to describe 'financial feudalism' although you stiil fail to see that it IS the current world order. But you continue to contradict youself in each paragraph in pandering to Jee's own deceptive hypocrisy.

That is to say, why are you still fawning over the very people who have caused the world's major problems, uhh??? Thus, it is impossible to have "compassion" for your masters of the universe when you yourself contribute to your own enslavement. That is insanity.

Matthew Jee's ludicrous exhortation to "develop compassion.... for the super-rich, bankers and politicians..." avoids the necessity for right action and right thinking to get rid of those who continue cause the problems and to replace them with more "compassionate" and responsible managers of the wordl's markets and resources.

In other words, it is the typical reversion to the 'head-in-the-sand' approach and the paralysis of fear which you both now propose - Oh, let's do nothing, just have compassion and it will all go away, uhh. So much for religious meddlers who are actually incompetent failures themselves in their own presumed area of expertise.

Just another clever agenda for Tibetans to align themselves with the powers that be in the West as they have been doing since Ghengis Khan and Kublai Khan.

Matthew_Jee
21 November 2008 at 16:58

"Matthew Jee's ludicrous exhortation to "develop compassion.... for the super-rich, bankers and politicians..." avoids the necessity for right action and right thinking to get rid of those who continue cause the problems and to replace them with more "compassionate" and responsible managers of the wordl's markets and resources. "

You are making many assumptions.I agree we need wholesale political and economic change and that these people in power most likely will lose all they have. That is why they deserve compassion. However replacing them with different people will not improve things one bit.

I wrote:

"the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer - and the environment continues to degrade.

These issues need to be addressed and slowly the economic paradigm is shifting. We need now to develop the wisdom to use our knowledge and skills properly. We must learn to live in a peaceful and sustainable way. This will demand the development of a new economics based on “simplicity, need and sufficiency” and not on “complexity, greed and power”. It will involve massive social, economic and financial change. It will take time. "

I'm all for change. Bring it on. The rich elite of this world have too much and need to seriously downsize. There is much more change needed than changing a few faces, Wholesale reform of politics would be a good start such that it becomes an honest means of creating a good society as opposed to a bad means of making a dishonest living.

Matthew

FreedomLand
22 November 2008 at 17:25

"I'm all for change. Bring it on..."

Yes, a good start was made by Tibetan Buddhists this week who have just had to finally accept that there are some things that they CAN'T change....

DHARAMSALA, India (Reuters) - "Tibetan exiles reaffirmed their commitment to the so-called "Middle Way" approach to China on Saturday but expressed impatience with the lack of progress in autonomy talks with Beijing. The decision followed a meeting of hundreds of Tibetans this week in the northern Indian town of Dharamsala..... The Middle Way, espoused by the Dalai Lama, abandons the dream of an independent Tibet in favor of seeking greater autonomy within China through dialogue..." http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE4AL1IH200811...

Thus the dreams and illusions of nationalism are unrealize-able and wanting independence in such a small country (pop. 6 million) in this age has seen relationships with China go backwards because of regional security issues. Thus they became trapped in their own web of endless wanting and desiring and 'attachment' which the Buddha specifically warned against.

That is really very poor Buddhism, never mind the politics. Also lacking in "compassion", Tibetan riots ensued in Lhasa in March in which many ethnic Chinese were attacked and killed or injured by impetuous young Tibetans. The path to autonomy (SAR - special autonomous region) was also set back many years as a result.

This is not so very different to Matthew Jee's pet Israeli kibbutz which, in the past, would also have been very 'uncompassionately' built on land siezed from Arab Palestinians - even to the extent of destroting their homes. Thus wholesale reform of politics would be a good start such that it becomes an honest means of creating a good society for all as opposed to a bad means of making a land grab or a power play.

gnuneo
22 November 2008 at 23:12

freedomland - you criticise a Buddhist for compassion? Do you imagine that Siddharta said "Feel Compassion for all living things - except those people that tick me off"?

feeling compassion does not mean accepting what is - it means recognising that in similar situations, it is likely that most would have behaved in the same way.

if you regard those with whom you disagree as being irredeemably 'evil', then you prevent any change that does not utterly destroy them. You prevent any mediated, peaceful solution. You prevent the possibility you can explain the problems to them, and let them agree with you. You prevent the possibility that they were simply venal, normal humans, and they become devils incarnate for you. You should read Aldous Huxley's "Eyeless in Gaza".

by refusing to walk the path of compassion, you lock yourself into hatred, into bigotry, into essentially a state of Fear.

the language you use reveals that your mentality is almost exactly a replica of that created by the Bush Regime against Muslims, and why did he do that? Because he wanted to prevent dialogue between West and Islam, in order to create and justify an endless war. Dehumanising those who disagree with you never gains you anything, except permanent and implacable enemies.

whereas compassion does not mean you accept everything "as is", it just allows you to understand the Other's point of view, which allows you to find the answers to the questions that they inevitably have about your own position.

you can see, had Matthew and I simply thrown your own anger at us back at you, where would we be now? In a useless argument, doubly useless as we all agree on the problems we face. Has our compassion for you meant we have accepted you and your opinions "as is"? No. Nor does it mean we are "weak on change" regarding the financial crisis.

hate will gain you nothing except an early grave.

FreedomLand
23 November 2008 at 06:50

"...had Matthew and I simply thrown your own anger at us back at you, where would we be now..."

gnuneo, It is you and MJ who are throwing YOUR anger around..... yours IS a useless argument, uhh. Its called denial (D'Nile!).

gnuneo
23 November 2008 at 21:54

anger...? Certainly, there are times i feel anger, and i express that. But where am i showing anger to you here, on this page? And please tell me what i am "denying" (D'Niling?), because the only thing i see could be denying that Bankers etc are of necessity 'Evil'.

i assume that you are a westerner, or at least living in the 'developed' world. Do you regard yourself as 'evil' because you were born into a strata of world society that is as far above the subsistence farmer in the 3rd world, as Harry and Billy are above you? Do you rage about the system that has given you so much, do you research how this has come about, do you daily wonder how you can change this iniquitous system?

are then those dying every day of *SO GODAMNED* easily treated diseases and starvation (ever fasted? try going without food for 3 days, and then imagine *never* eating again, until you finally die...) in the 3rd world right to consider *YOU* evil? Would they be right to regard *YOU* as 'irredeemable'? Or would you like that they try to understand *your life* through the lens of compassion?

i quite assure you, every argument you could use to defend yourself against the 3rd world, can be used against you by the wealthy bankers/Elites in our own societies.

do you have any idea how few in this world eschew privileges, advantages, wealth, power, and try to live a simple, good life? Does that mean the majority are irredeemable? Not worthy of Compassion? Not worthy to be thought of as equally Human?

not according to Siddhartta

gnuneo
23 November 2008 at 21:59

...strange! Posted itself! O.o

not according to Siddharta, and he was one of the Greatest of us, i choose to agree with him. (not through misplaced 'hero worship', but because he is simply right.)

and from yet another Great Teacher: "Let he who is without Sin cast the first stone".

FreedomLand
24 November 2008 at 09:05

I'm not sure you know what it is that you are talking about, gnuneo, but I'm gald for you that you finally managed to get it all off your chest, uhh. The NS moderator has also obviously expressed "compassion" in allowing you to do so.....

Heading "South" - Let us not cast stones as they tend to rattle in tin cans and on iron roofs..... (a 3rd World idea?). LOL.

But for Matthew_Jee, a fake Buddhist I DO criticize for lack of true compassion, his "economic paradigm" will cause us all to starve through excusing bad action, bad thinking and bad karma. That will NOT result in us living "...in a peaceful and sustainable way..." and riots and upheaval will ensue as sure as those incited by young rock-throwing robed fake Buddhists in Lhasa.

The "massive social, economic and financial change..." involved will take time, though, especially what is coming over the hill as a result of climate change. The global financial/economic crisis created by a massively irresponsible credit bubble couldn't have come at a worse time.

Thus Nature will have the final say about the future of the human race on this Earth, seemingly compassionate or otherwise, and regardless of what Jesus or Prince Siddartha or Mohammed or krishna might or might not have once said.....

"The Moving Finger writes;

and, having writ, Moves on:

nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,

Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it."

Carl Jones
24 November 2008 at 10:04

MJ.....LOL.....LOL...."they will lose everything they have", yeh, right.LOL

We the people would like to be civilised, but its gone way beyond that point, just look at the riots in Iceland, not only do the Icelanders want blood for the banking crisis, their demented leaders have sold them into NWO IMF SLAVERY...we might be witnessing the first genuine revolution in God knows (lol) how many years.LOL

You can mock all you like, but YOU can`t hide from the stupidity of your argument....thinking of Burma and the point when there is nothing left but violence.

BTW, for other readers, word on the wire suggests that Obama`s New Year designed crisis could be collapse Saudi oil production.LOL

FreedomLand
24 November 2008 at 19:39

Carl Jones: "....thinking of Burma and the point when there is nothing left but violence..."

It is the military regime there which thinks only of violence. What the Buddhist monks there demonstrated was true self-sacrifice and bravery. That is far different to the bland "compassion" that Matthew Jee would conveniently have us believe in. It is really only a kind of complacency or cowardice, uhh.

You could say that theirs was also compassion - and so it was - but it was moulded into action by right thinking and the desire to serve others. Thus there is a world of difference compared with the permissiveness of excusing the misdeeds of others and failing to address the real causes.

But what Matthew Jee really meant at the beginning of his story was more a kind of FORGIVENESS than compassion. That IS the way to think positively about others' or even one's own errors. To him, though, it doesn't seem politically correct enough. Again, why? But I'm sure he'll now be rushing to forgive himself for his shortcomings, ha ha.

The disappointing thing here then is that words have been misapplied or applied in wrong ways. That is misleading in itself. The fact that Jee is unable to contemplate the role of Karma, even when I mentioned it, is significant. As a Buddhist tenet and a point on which his own teacher has spoken, his omission is telling and he must be an embarrassment to her as a student.

One must ask, then, was the agenda he was actually on about entirely his or had she some part in propelling him - and for what reason?

Matthew_Jee
27 November 2008 at 19:38

Compassion means to be able to put yourself in someone else's shoes, understand how they may be feeling, generating empathy and understanding for them.

Even if person's actions appear "evil" or "wrong" one can still comprehend that they are acting out of greed, ignorance or hatred. These things are not innate in the person but conditioned environmentally. There is an overwhelming body of scientific evidence to support this.

So we can act towards them in a compassionate manner with this knowledge. It does not mean to forgive and forget. It means to educate and use skilful means to enable this person to change..

Through compassion we can meet the other with less confrontation. We re all the same under the skin. And we can realise that the person in front of us is primarily a product of their experiences.

These approaches allow bridge building and cross cultural understanding and dialogue. They engender positive change.

We need an economic revolution, yet peaceful, we need an end to war. We need to feed and house and educate and provide health for the world. We need this more than Paris Hilton needs a new dress. Our economic priorities are upside down completely.

The economics of the last hundred years has failed miserably - and so has the politics. After all "war is an extension of politics by force", and an extension that demonstrates the failure of the politics of diplomacy.

I do not pretend to know all the answers. I know change is coming and I propose that compassion and developing skilful means can be really useful in making change less confrontational for everyone.

Matthew Jee

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

After the truth

29 May 2009 10:09

Islam's young faithful

18 May 2009 17:33

The Pilgrim Pope

14 May 2009 10:53

Technology, the Latter-day way

12 May 2009 09:45

The Age of the E-church

07 May 2009 12:43

Christianity and the Petri dish

06 May 2009 11:48

Judaism and charity

30 April 2009 16:07

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker