Return to: Home | Blogs | The Faith Column

The Missionary Position

Tom Quinn finishes his series on Mormonism with a treatise on the most visible aspect of the faith: the shirt-and-tie clad missionaries who always seem interrupt dinner, naps and important phone calls.

No discussion of Mormonism, even one as aimless and amorphous as this, would be complete without mentioning the most visible—and arguably most annoying—aspect of the LDS Church: the missionaries.

Like an incredibly awkward, acne-riddled army, these teenagers and twentysomethings leave their families, jobs, educations and the occasional girlfriend to travel the world, selling Jesus door-to-door for two full years. During that time, Mormon missionaries live like monks; they give up television, films, and secular music, and are only allowed to phone their parents twice per year.

Incredibly, these youths serve willingly, without compensation, and have no say in where they end up. They fill out an application and spend the next two weeks waiting for a letter that will tell them where they'll be suffering—excuse me, working—for the next two years. My application took an extra week to process, possibly because I listed my blood type as “warm” on the medical information page.

The time between turning in one's application and receiving one's marching orders can be incredibly nerve-wracking for the missionary-to-be, as he or she could be sent virtually anywhere in the world. Some of my acquaintances went to exotic, far-off places like Mumbai, India, while others merely received a bus ticket to Pocatello, Idaho, where it was once against the law to look sad. Seriously.

My two-year stint as a missionary took me to Sao Paulo, Brazil, where I quickly learned that drug dealers, contrary to popular belief, are just like the rest of us. I passed most of my days in shanty towns and spent a particularly memorable period of time living in a tiny flat situated above an all-night karaoke bar. I swear, if I hear the Portuguese version of “Who let the dogs out” one more time...

In spite of my less-than-ideal accommodations and a language barrier that took about five months to break down (I didn't speak a single word of Portuguese before arriving), I learned a staggering amount about both myself and life in general in a surprisingly short period of time. Having grown up in a middle-class family, I had never even seen poverty, let alone lived in it. My two years in Brazil opened my eyes to the plight of developing nations while simultaneously giving me unique opportunities to serve others. While there I taught English, painted houses, moved furniture, and even made an ill-advised attempt at changing the spark plugs in my neighbour's Fiat. I bet that poor guy is still trying to get that awful car started.

Obviously, the missionary program's primary function is converting individuals to our particular brand of Christianity, a goal which doesn't often sit well with other churches or their members, hence the astronomical number of doors that were slammed in my face. Nevertheless, I sometimes worked with ecclesiastical leaders from other denominations to solve problems that, frankly, were well beyond my 19-year-old maturity level. As a missionary, one can be called upon to play roles ranging from marriage counselor to Alcoholics Anonymous sponsor, and in such situations an experienced pastor or rabbi can be an invaluable resource.

Overall, those two years in Brazil provided me with the biggest challenge I've faced in my young life. At times I was utterly miserable, yet the experience as a whole was undeniably rewarding in some sort of strange, round-about way. Some of my more devout friends insist that their missions were the best times of their lives and claim they would give anything to be able to go back. I, however, respectfully disagree. Frankly, I've had quite enough of the missionary position, thank you very much.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

Hoochalaffa
20 June 2008 at 02:43

It's okay to be dissatisfied with the outcome of one's mission, but would you go as fart to say prospective missionaries should not go?

john
20 June 2008 at 03:14

Some missionaries go willingly, like I did, but many don't. All males are commanded to serve a mission when they turn 19 -- it is not a voluntary program. And not only do they not get paid, they, or their family, are supposed to pay for the mission's expenses themselves (sounds rather cult-like to me). Members love to tell you that missionaries go voluntarily, go only because they choose to, but that is a lie that ignores the words of church leaders and official church writings. Read the following few examples:

A Gospel Doctrine manual (The official Sunday School manual for Mormon adults) says, “Through his prophets, the Lord has repeatedly commanded every worthy, able young man to serve a full-time mission.” President Thomas S. Monson of the First Presidency (currently the church's prophet) said, “The command to go has not been rescinded. Rather, it has been reemphasized. Today thousands of missionaries are serving in response to the call.” Elder William R. Bradford of the Seventy (a position of high authority in the church) spoke to Mormon boys and their parents, specifically addressing any of them who “would justify [them]selves in not doing [their] duty to God [by serving a mission]”:

'If I could speak separately to each of you young men and your parents who so justify, I would say with all the power of speech I could generate, "Just who do you think you are? What right do you have to match your wisdom with that of God, who through His prophets has issued a firm decree, a solemn mandate, that the restored gospel must be declared to all the world by the voice of His disciples? This means you!" '

Technically you can say that Mormon boys are not threatened with physical harm if they do not serve a mission, and are therefore not "forced" to go, but the social pressure to do so is huge when it comes in the form of a "commandment" coming from church leaders that Mormons consider to be prophets and apostles to the exact same extent as the prophets and apostles in the Bible.

Quinn's mission experience was relatively recent. When I served my mission in the early 80's, we spent 100% of our time proselytizing. That was the one and only purpose of my mission -- to convert people to our way of thinking. If you want to read an accurate and honest account of a Mormon mission, I highly recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Mormon-Cult-Missionary-Reveals-Secrets...

References:

Old Testament Gospel Doctrine, 33: Sharing the Gospel with the World, p. 162.

Thomas S. Monson, “The Army of the Lord,” Tambuli, Apr. 1990, p. 28.

William R. Bradford, “Sanctification through Missionary Service,” Ensign, Nov. 1981, p. 49.

hroderick
20 June 2008 at 04:46

Wow some pretty sour grapes. I won't argue any points because the mission experience is purely subjective. Young adults get lots of pressure from their family and their social world to, for example, join the military, attend college, etc. The mission pressure is definitely part of the mormon culture for the same reasons. Our personal life experience leads us to believe, beyond all church teachings, there's no better way to finish off an adult man than two years of Godly service.

I myself have sent three sons on missions, to Argentina, Philipines, and DC and their experience has been so much more than anything else their peers, both not of the faith and unable to serve, experienced. They learned to rely on themselves and on God when it was more than they could handle. They had intimate observations of the hellish lives some people make for themselves and come to realize the consequences of choices in a way that no teacher or book could ever convey. They learn to appreciate things we all take for granted, like toothpaste, that's beyond the means of many in third world poverty. They realized that in any high or low circumstances people want mainly to be accepted. And they learned so much more about themselves.

It is true that they leave hoping to help spread joy among people searching for answers to questions of faith. But even when there's no conversions after two years diligent effort, a better man, future father, and future lay minister returns with strong commitment on how he will live his life.

In practice maybe 50% of young men serve. The key word is "worthy" and unfortunately by 19 in modern society many are not. The other key is willing, if they don't have strong enough faith in the outcomes of abiding the church's teachings to want to share it with others, we don't want them out there...or instead of desirable fruits from the experience it will be sour grapes as demonstrated by other posters who obviously went for the wrong reasons.

And by the way, I did not serve myself at 18-19 but now wish I had and hope to later in life. A by-product of mormon lifestyle is a statistically long happy healthy life. The number of grey haired couple missionaries continues to grow and is strongly encouraged by the church.

If you're interested enough to read this far, get to know a missionary and decide for yourself why they serve. They are easily found at www.mormon.org.

I can guarantee them to be very respectful to you.

bgcasper
20 June 2008 at 05:29

I served 30 years ago. Best and hardest experience of my life. I would have always regretted it if I hadn't of gone. I will always be thankful that I went.

Usually, boys leave and mature, fine men return. Like anything in life, there are many outcomes. You get out of it what you put into it. The negative dude is not and was not immune from this "law."

Pierre
20 June 2008 at 17:23

Religion is the Worlds cancer.....................

Starsong_Dragon
25 June 2008 at 05:43

I was raised Mormon. My mother told my brother when he was only 8 years old that if he didn't go on a misson then he was no longer her son. Thats evil, pure and simple He didn't go. We don't talk to her anymore. Guess why.

copytech
29 June 2008 at 02:39

some people are wrong that doesn't make the Church wrong.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

After the truth

29 May 2009 10:09

Islam's young faithful

18 May 2009 17:33

The Pilgrim Pope

14 May 2009 10:53

Technology, the Latter-day way

12 May 2009 09:45

The Age of the E-church

07 May 2009 12:43

Christianity and the Petri dish

06 May 2009 11:48

Judaism and charity

30 April 2009 16:07

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker