Registered user login:

TheFaithColumn

The Faith Column

Every week a different believer gives the inside track on their religion or philosophy.

The Faith Column Homepage

Beyond good and evil

  • Posted by Keith Pearson
  • 06 November 2007

If humanity is to reinvent itself, it must learn to overcome the prejudices of 'morality'

Nietzsche’s philosophy is best approached as one huge intellectual experiment with a laboratory of new methods, concepts, and thought experiments. As I have mentioned, it has two main aspects: purification and dedication.

Humanity is to reinvent itself and learn to know itself for the first time. We are not what we take ourselves to be, either as knowing subjects or moral agents; or, as Nietzsche says, we knowers are unknown to ourselves.

We are seekers of knowledge and want knowledge – this is true of Plato, of the Christian, and so on – and yet we don’t know where to find it. We’ve been looking in the wrong places (the afterworld or the hinterworld).

Nietzsche promotes what he calls ‘the gay science’ – living life as a means to knowledge with the reward of serenity or a rich cheerfulness - and invites us to think ‘beyond good and evil’. There are two sets of prejudices that need to be worked against here and defeated: those of ‘morality’ and those of the philosophers. Nietzsche promotes himself as an immoralist but knows also that he is a great moralist.

He calls for ‘the self-overcoming of morality’, and although this sounds grandiose, even pretentious, Nietzsche stresses that his taste is for more modest propositions when it comes to ‘morality’, and adds that we perform this task ‘out of morality’.

In short, his critique of morality is an ethical one. It involves learning to think beyond the belief in the absolute opposition of values, that is, not treating values – true and false, good and evil, egoism and altruism – as if these denoted pure (metaphysical) entities uncontaminated by each other and historical mixtures.

A philosophy of ‘good and evil’ would hold that what is ‘good’ is pure, uncontaminated by empirical or historical sources and origins. When Nietzsche thinks ‘beyond good and evil’ he is, at least in one important respect, thinking in direct opposition and contrast to the fanatic.

The free spirit is the opposite of the fanatic. The moral fanatic is someone who holds, with frightening naiveté, that the good can grow only out of the good and upon the basis of the good. The moral dogmatist holds that there is a pure realm of morality where we can readily disentangle the non-egoistic and the egoistic drives and affects.

Perhaps they also take a morality of guilt and punishment to be a real feature of the world and a real agent, as when someone tells you that you deserve your current suffering or misery, or that natural events are the will of God.

When we honestly examine what is often taken to be the summit of the moral in philosophy - the mastery of the affects – we discover that there is pleasure to be taken in this mastery. I can impress myself by what I can deny, defer, resist, etc. It is through this mastery that I grow and develop.

And yet ‘morality’ as we moderns have come to understand it would have to give such ethical self-mastery a bad conscience. If we take as our criterion of the moral to be self-sacrificing resolution and self-denial, we would have to say, being honest, that such acts are not performed strictly for the sake of others; my own fulfilment is at work (my pride).

On the basis of a completely unscientific understanding of ‘morality’ – so-called ‘unegoistic actions’ - a false ethics gets erected, buttressed by religion and metaphysical monsters, and the shadow of these dismal spirits in the end falls across physics and the entire perception of the world.

Nietzsche wants us to appreciate our ethical complexity, not posit an unrealistic conception of ourselves, which has such harmful effects. We think we have an adequate understanding of moral agency, e.g. that we have properly identified moral motives and located the sources of moral agency. The opposite, Nietzsche argues is, in fact, the case: we completely lack knowledge in moral matters.

For Nietzsche the good virtues and the evil vices two are reciprocally conditioning: all ‘good’ things have arisen out of dark roots through sublimation and spirtualization, and they continue to feed off such roots.

Morality expects a person to be dutiful, obedient, self-sacrificing in their core and at all times: this demands ascetic self-denial and is a form of refined cruelty (it’s pretty stupid too). In every ascetic morality, Nietzsche writes, the human worships a part of itself as God and then needs to diabolize the other part.

Nietzsche continues to affirm the need for morality in the following senses:

-As techniques of physical-spiritual discipline.
-As an instinct for education and cultivation. He wants this ‘unconscious instinct’ to be placed in the service of new individuals and not, as we have he thinks now, that of ‘the power-instinct of the herd’.
-An aspiration towards autonomy (this might be the prerogative of the free spirit).

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

lukelea
20 November 2007 at 02:12

I always think of N. as a Walter Middy type of character: a sick shrimp day dreaming about himself as a Napoleonic hero, for whose glory the death of millions ordinary human beings means absolutly nothing.

Why any civilized person in the West today would take such a ridiculous figure seriously is beyond me. No doubt for certain academics their is a certain thrill in it. Many are no doubt Waler Middies themselves.

I do know this though: if any person with N's philosophy looked like he had a serious chance at siezing power in America, I would not hesitate to risk my life to kill him.

newman
05 June 2008 at 11:45

-Good and Evil R just human being concept, yeah there r good and evil (mankind concept) for one reasons (mankind is intelligent being) no way to live with each others with out good and evil, each one will kill the others without good,,,,,or,,,, and without Evil there is no meaning to Good,,,,,

Like no meaning to white if we didn't recognize black,

if there is someone has high degree " doctorate degree,,," this does not mean he has the ability to think, few have this ability. when we look to the concept of perception now adays we can see how much mankind's level of thinking still very low...

Jhon Derrack
16 June 2008 at 11:56

yeah, we need Faith to feel safer,

Faith is a belief in the trustworthiness of an idea that one has not been proven formally and cannot prove formally.

Jhon Derrack
16 June 2008 at 12:08

our way of thinking makes the different.

mcmane
19 June 2008 at 11:51

I want to ask you do u think God has low level of thinking to make many religions! or he wants mankind to kill each others, or he cannot keep one religion for all mankind or or he wants to examine mankind's half mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Keith Ansell Pearson holds a Personal Chair in Philosophy at the University of Warwick. He did his graduate studies at the University of Sussex in the early to mid 1980s and also spent two periods of research studying in Berlin with the late Prof Dr Wolfgang Mueller-Lauter. He is co-editor of the English translation of the Colli-Montinari edition Nietzsche's Collected Works being published in 19 volumes by Stanford University Press and that will be completed by 2012.

Recent Posts

Are the Kalash being converted to Islam?

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 04 September 2008

Temples of the Kalasha religion

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 02 September 2008

Pakistan's ancient religion

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 01 September 2008

Will the Dalai Lama return to Tibet?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 29 August 2008

Why did the Dalai Lama ban Dorje Shugden?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 28 August 2008

Are Dalai Lama's critics backed by China?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 27 August 2008

The deity banned by Dalai Lama

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 26 August 2008