Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

What is Krishnamurti saying?

David Skitt introduces the first of his four columns on the subject of Krishnamurti and his teachings

If all of Krishnamurti’s talks and discussions were published they would require 400 average-sized books [some 70 volumes have been published]. This does not make his oeuvre easy to summarise, since it can be said to embody his view that human consciousness, when working well, is constantly unfolding, in a process of endless learning, never arriving at an end result, at any set of final conclusions. But to say what he thought of faith is a useful way into his account of consciousness. He sees both faith and belief as holding something to be true which is unsupported by fact, as lulling the mind into a false sense of security. We cling to such states from fear and from failure to understand and deal with what he called what is, to facts such as conflict and violence, whether personal or international. And once we have differing faiths and beliefs they themselves are an inevitable source of conflict.

Conflict and violence Krishnamurti sees as issues of basic concern to any serious human being. But in his view history shows there has been a repeated failure of education, science, politics and organised religion to end them. What is needed in our time therefore is to own up to that failure, to make a clean sweep of all these past, defective endeavours, and to adopt an entirely new approach. It is quite hard to imagine taking a more radical position than this. Put aside everything you have ever learned from others, ever read, and start your own inquiry into what life is about, what really matters. Stand on your own feet. Stop being a second-hand human being.

He proposes that this means looking at what is actually happening in life and in our consciousness—‘what is, not what should be’—without condemning or justifying, without resisting or wanting to change it, holding it instead ‘like a precious jewel.’ In so doing, he says, we are looking at human consciousness not just our own. This non-judgemental watching, free from all past-based thought and projection, is for him ‘pure observation’. If accompanied by a passion to find out, there will then be fresh understanding, he says, a ‘going beyond’ one’s previous state of consciousness.

A constant source of human confusion in Krishnamurti’s view is our rooted tendency to make images of ourselves, others, and of life and death that are put together by thought based on memory, on past experience or hearsay. Instead of looking afresh at what is new in the now, being open to the unknown and unpredictable, we ‘translate the present into the past.’ He sees such images are inevitably conflictual because they are time-bound and therefore partial and inadequate. Yet we frequently act as though we are programmed by them.

Krishnamurti maintains that we fail to make the most of our mind and of our life while subject to latent or manifest anger and fear. Also, our sense of self is usually experienced as inherently apart from another’s, whereas all human beings share far more psychologically than separates them. Not to see that is a huge error of perception, because our sense of shared humanity is lost. This feeling of psychological apartness breeds a fear of isolation that leads, among other things, to a spurious sense of safety in numbers, which is then, unfortunately and divisively, carried to excess in nationalism, political ideology, and religious faith. These provide a false cohesion held together by fear that there are those ‘outside’ who threaten us and are in some way not as fully human as we are.

Seeing the problems in our personal life and in the world with a mind free from the dictates of the past, from faith, belief, stereotyping, and fantasy, is to see that what goes wrong in the world outside reflects what goes wrong in one’s own mind. When there is insight into that, Krishnamurti says, there is a wholly different way of living, in which an awakened awareness of what causes human suffering also brings with it greater sensitivity to the beauty and immensity of life.

He cautions his audience, ‘You don’t have to believe all this—I am not an authority. But take a little time to look at this. Test it out.’

2 comments

Douglas Chalmers's picture

"Krishnamurti maintains that we fail to make the most of our mind and of our life while subject to latent or manifest anger and fear...." and it is my experience that people of Indian ethnic origin understand the nature of Krishnamurti's path if they accept such teachings. It takes more for the average Westerner to reach their depth of undertsanding and there is a reason for that. Europeans have failed to focus on what is in their haerts and what is positive in their daily lives for a very long time.

It is something which has been leached from them since the usurpation of Christianity by the church of Rome for the creation of a vain empire. Returning to spirituality, SQ, as the core of our lives is essential for progress. It is as fundamental as EQ (emotional quotient) and IQ will ever be. The only faith you ever need to have is that "the Force will always be with you" as long as you are prepared to act. It is the Life which courses through us, our atoms and all of the Universe. On renouncing all attachment ot our petty wants and desires, we can become FREE to choose whatever It wants for us.

David Pellow's picture

For the life of me I can't decide if this guy was completely nuts or if he really did have something important to say. Time and time again he seems to lead the reader right up to the brink of a huge insight that invariably dissolves into some slippery poetic punchline that fails to deliver. At least it does for me. I mean how do we relate to a person who claims never to have had the sense of being an "I" as in a separate person? Does the solution to the problems of 'personhood' like experiencing fear, lonliness, longing, (never mind those aspects of our experience that are not problematic like excitement at meeting an old friend or a new one, joy at finally mastering a difficult piece on the guitar etc.) mean 'shedding' one's personhood, chucking it off as an irrelevant illusion? Is that something we could ever want? Never to feel the deep loss for a loved one passed away (for example) because that is living in the past and a failure to 'fully be with what is" ?

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets