Return to: Home | Blogs | The Faith Column

Satanism - it isn't for everyone

In his final contribution to the Faith Column, Umberto Ray explains why he is pleased Satanism lacks universal appeal

As any Church Of Satan representative such as myself will tell you we know that Satanism is not for everyone. None of us expect to stand here espousing the tenets which form the bedrock of this religion and have every man and his dog knocking at our door seeking to throw in their lot with the dread prince of darkness. We would not want it any other way. We are not looking to entice the naive with promise of delight. The poet Charles Bukowski warned “Beware the average man – everything he does will be average.” Our challenge therefore remains - We Are Looking For A Few Outstanding Individuals!

Experience has taught us that Satanists are born and not made. For this reason we do not seek attention or to ensnare the saintly in the twisted web of deceit that so many are convinced we attempt to weave in the name of all things unholy. We realise our decree is not one that bends in acquiescence to the devices of mass consumption.

It is for this reason we declare ourselves the alien elite, proudly remaining emancipated from the tedium of mediocrity creeping into society, art, politics, literature and the media - comfortably sliding into bed next to all those who have subscribed to its mores and paid up in full. Our brand of elitism is one of ethics, not ethnicity. It is one that espouses the merits of the just and curses the rotten – those who would seek to deny the carnal pleasures of life and man’s own declaration of Godhood. I have no desire to offer the asinine listeners of Radio 4 hope by appearing on “Thought For The Day.”

However, over the last few days I have provided here an ephemeral glimpse through the veil that, for the casual onlooker, shrouds much of our adamantine philosophy in mystery. At the very least I hope I have proved entertaining enough to open up a few lively discussions and flung open the gates of hell to those individuals who most naturally resonate with us and will thus seek to further their knowledge by exploring the tenets within the pages of The Satanic Bible.

As an existing member of the church I am often asked how I came to become one of the many and varied individuals who make up what is The Church Of Satan. For me personally, it was some time during the late 1980’s when, sitting in the waiting room of a car repair shop, I casually picked up a newspaper and opened it at random. I was immediately drawn to a small photo in the corner. It was a picture of a shaven headed fellow with a goatee beard. I remember he rather reminded me of Ming The Merciless from Flash Gordon. But his scowling countenance possessed a twisted smile that was part personification of malice and part mockery, as if at the same time challenging the reader to ask himself the question “is he serious?”

The man was, of course, Anton Szandor LaVey. I cannot even remember what this filler article was about beyond the fact that it was a disparaging piece marking LaVey out as possibly the most evil man on the face of the earth. But it was the footnote at the bottom that caught my attention – “LaVey authored The Satanic Bible in 1969.” The very next day I rushed into a bookshop in Birmingham City and bought the book.

What I discovered was that yes, he was serious. In Blanche Barton’s authorised biography of LaVey The Secret Life Of A Satanist she mentions that his office desk bore a plaque engraved with the maxim “Beware of those that bow down before you – they might be reaching for the corner of the rug.” This amusing little anecdote pretty much sums up my own impressions when I first read LaVey’s bible. And that was whilst he was indeed serious, Satanism is rather like the stand-up comedian who’s implicit truths are delivered on a skewer of sardonic laughter that stabs the very heart of those deserved folks who, with a bit of luck, might die laughing.

The “joke” is on them. And we will be in no rush to alleviate their discomfort; after all, in the words of Herbert Spencer “the ultimate effect of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.”

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

9 comments from readers

gnuneo
10 August 2007 at 14:43

do you know the main problem with the theory "the strong rule the weak"?

it is that it ensures that those with information do not share it, those with wisdom keep it to themselves, those with power over others hang on to it with every breath in their body.

the more stratified a hierarchy is, the less information flow there is - basic information theory. The less information flow, the less evolution, the less growth.

in what way is satanism distinguished from catholicism in this regard? Oh yes, you worship sexuality.

the truly strong do not need to fear others, they freely share their knowledge, wisdom and abilities, and they teach others also do so, because this is how a worthwhile society/community is created.

as a teacher myself, i hope that one day my students will outdo me, and i will do everything in my power to help them achieve this, because this is the best reward a teacher can have.

i am not so insecure as to need to dominate others to justify myself, to have a self-image of how 'strong' i am in comparison, i share my abilities and knowledge because from that all are benefited, and when it is returned then i gain along with the rest of the community.

have some abused this? Yes, of course they have, but i do not see this as proof the philosophy is wrong, it is proof that those individuals are damaged, and need help.

in 100yrs we are all dead, all our dreams, hopes, fears and psycho-dramas with us, all we can hope for is to leave something of benefit, something that helps the human race in its evolution.

turning the clock back to dogmatic control freakish power-struggles hardly does that.

the most successful species are those that have learned to cooperate and share, just as a football team that works together will stomp a team composed of egotistical satanists who are all competing constantly amongst themselves for control of the ball.

i honestly hope one day you will understand this, and move forward as a person and philosopher.

still, it has been interesting reading your articles, thank you very much for sharing them, and kudos to the NS for inviting you to speak.

peace.

sonofmorris
11 August 2007 at 00:46

Gnuneo

Satanism must be followed but in combination with the law.. here, where i live.. it is the law to go to school, at least until you are 16 years of age.. people would still learn if we were all satanists.

It is your job to teach, therefore you teach... how would this be any different for a teacher who was also a satanist? If your old teacher walked into the class and declared he would no longer teach you.. he would be out of a job.. he would have no money.. his quality of living would hit rock bottom.. how is this good for a satanist and his well being? it isnt, and therefor in direct collision with the direction of the satanic philosophy.

what happens in 100 years is of no consquence to us, a satanist lives in the here and now, there is no afterlife.

However, i also agree with you, working towards leaving something behind.. is merely a natural fear of death and being forgoten.. and this fear should be nurtured, a satanist who doesnt improve the world he lives in either by working and generating money.. or by contributing inspirational and ground breaking works of art, or simply by running our country? etc, would be considered a waster, and would be abhorred in a satanic community.

"turning the clock back to dogmatic control freakish power-struggles hardly does that."

ahah! but it does.. would you prefer your philosophy was dominant on the planet or one that you abhored? ;)

"a football team that works together will stomp a team composed of egotistical satanists who are all competing constantly amongst themselves for control of the ball"

a yes.. but football is governed by rules.. and rules are there to be followed, a key point in the philosophy as stated previously. A goal keepers job is to stop the ball from getting into the net, defenders have to stop opposing players getting passed them with the ball, and the mid field is designed to dominate the park and pass the ball to the upper half, the players there are designated as goal scorers... with all these particular jobs in mind, i fail to see how a group of 'egotistical satanists' can do anything but work best together, for a satanist applies himself as best he can in the role he is set to fulfil. Just as im sure you do as a teacher.

with this in mind... we are moving ever forward as a community.. fuflilling all the parts it needs to function. which i belive is what the community needs, function and not waste.

p.s Gnuneo, i was impressed with this post, it was very objective at points and was not wholely offensive in the slightest, i enjoyed reading it and also i enjoyed responding to it

thanks muchly

ever forward

alba gu bra

Gurgobean
12 August 2007 at 05:17

Satanism! We the loving!

Satanism! We hate the hating!

Satanism! We reward the rewarding!

Satanism! We fulfill the fulfilling!

Satanism! We destroy the destroying!

Satanism! We drink lots of beer!

*Chug, chug.*

I am a Satanist because I like to read Mark Twain in while taking a bubble bath! That's my religion! That's an inversion of Christianity!

Gurgobean
12 August 2007 at 05:19

I the Typos!

I the Drunk!

I the Poet!

I the Sarcastic!

Carl Jones
12 August 2007 at 13:18

What a revalation...Umburto Ray says "satanism is fun". I do so so hope he`s developed this opinion from his own "low" perspective.:)

Our world is in a mess. this by accident or design. My own perspective is that our media/ruling elite likes the "accident" illusion. But in actual fact, our world is the way it is by "design".

Ray, you are a satanist and proud of your calling. Have you ever considered the high-end of your tree?

Our world isn`t run by democracy, We aren`t protected by the police and courts. Because all these areas are saurated with Freemason lackeys..ok, they are just the low end, like yourself.

The high end of Freemasonary is occuped by the Rothschilds, Bush`s and Blair`s of this world. And to think the American elite (inc the Bush`s) visit Bohemian Grove to perform their satanic rituals. Notably the "cremation of care". Its rumoured that in the past, this involved "human sacrifice"...did Blair pay a visit last year??

Harvard university is very elite in its own right. Yet out of 1000`s of new students each year, only 9 are invited to join the super elite Harvard club, the satanic "Skull and Bones". Bush senior was a member, so was Dubya and John Kerry, US presidential candidate who stood to fall....

....these Ray are your eite satanists...the worlds elite are "sickos"!!!

Clinton bombed Bonia for 92 day targgeting civilians...a "war crime". Milosevic was murdered, because he was going to call Clinton as a witness. Bush senior and John Major forced sanctions against Iraq through the UN...these murdered 1,000,000 Iraqi`s over 13 years...another war crime committed by your satanic brothers. Shall I now move on to Iraq...or has your blood started to boil?

No one apart from a few, like Pilger, are willing to speak the truth.

I have no respect for any church, any designed ideology (like yours), I don`t believe demoracy exists anywhere on this planet, I don`t believe in the War on Terror as portrayed by our "in-pay" politicians, I don`t trust the police (my dad was one and spent years rejecting offers from the Masons) and I have ABSOLUTLY no respect for our judges. Ray, stay wth the programme, you are as trapped as everyone else in this sick evil construct.

Tony_Blur
16 August 2007 at 19:26

A very intelligent and well written article. It is such pity that the likes of Carl Jones cannot at least respect the views of others without resorting to sarcasm and disrespect for others opinions.

I am neither a Satanist or a Christian. In fact I choose to not to follow any faith. However, I do at least know the writer through his posts elsewhere and what I can say is that he has never forced his views on anyone else, and furthermore, this particular individual goes out of his way to be helpful to others. Sure he has a low tolerance level for idiots and shares with us what some might consider quite radical ideas, but - at least he has something to say!

Looking around the world today we must concede that religion still has the ability to cause strife and turmoil on a grand scale. You only need to look at the way international terrorism has escalated under the guise of religion. A few hundred years ago it was the Christians. In recent times we have seen conflict in India and Pakistan. We have witnessed divisions in Northern Ireland. Since historical records began religion of one form or another is probably responsible for more human deaths than any other cause. I wonder how many crusades and violent deaths the Satanic Church is responsible for? I wonder what evil terrorist plots they have up their sleeves.

I note an interesting comment by gruneo;

in what way is satanism distinguished from catholicism in this regard? Oh yes, you worship sexuality.

And your point is? Worshiping sexuality is not new. It also does far less harm than the Spanish Inquisition did. If current trends continue, and mainstream religion trundles along the way it always has done, then the Church of Satan cannot fail to gain popularity purely because a lot of what Umberto Ray writes actually makes a lot more sense.

schreeny
28 August 2007 at 15:13

Tony_Blur, I would like to know why Ray is allowed to express his opinion but to you Carl Jones must, in expressing his, be therefore disrespecting those of others. Is he not allowed then or shouldn't he? What is he supposed to do then? Comment something like 'oh yes that's nice' or 'you're correct'? By your logic then you are disrespecting Carl Jones and 'the likes of 'his, as wel as gruneo, are you not? Tell me how to comment and 'respect' another's views then? i thought we lived in a place where there is some degree of free speech. I fail to see why being critical is disrespectiful and neccessarily bad, otherwise what is the point of this commet section? Do you not like criticism, do you feel you are correct and no one else must express opinions because they are 'sarcastic 'and 'disrespectful,' as you describe them?

Carl Jones
09 September 2007 at 01:03

Hey guys, I could get to liking this "disrespectings"

stuff".

I don`t give a monkeys about "satanism"...Mr Ray can continue his love affair with the devil. Ray is in a "mechanism". The real elite will use every belief structure going, if it furthers their sick agenda.

I love the name "Tony Blur"...heck, I do respect the views of others...........but I`m so sorry if you can`t take the heat, You see, I did reply with a well thought out reply. But so far there isn`t a respectable answer.

So Tony, you keep on with the "roots stuff", you should get on with Ray...meanwhile I`ll be up in the conopy.

rebeccaprescottuk
12 November 2007 at 13:49

QED methinks

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

After the truth

29 May 2009 10:09

Islam's young faithful

18 May 2009 17:33

The Pilgrim Pope

14 May 2009 10:53

Technology, the Latter-day way

12 May 2009 09:45

The Age of the E-church

07 May 2009 12:43

Christianity and the Petri dish

06 May 2009 11:48

Judaism and charity

30 April 2009 16:07

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker