Registered user login:

TheFaithColumn

The Faith Column

Every week a different believer gives the inside track on their religion or philosophy.

The Faith Column Homepage

Being spiritual without faith?

  • Posted by Susan Blackmore
  • 13 March 2007

Out of body experiences, Zen, witchcraft and some interesting drugs

Is it possible to have a spiritual life without faith? Can one tread a spiritual path without believing in souls, or gods, or other worlds? Can one be spiritual while not believing there are spirits?

I say yes. And I say this because I have none of those beliefs and yet I find myself working at something that I have no adequate word for other than "a spiritual path". Let me explain.

For as long as I can remember I have been obsessed with difficult questions – the big questions of human existence – why are we here, what is a human being anyway, why am I me and not someone else, does it matter what I do, what happens when I die?

In some way these eternal questions have motivated all my scientific work. I was just a first year student when I had my first dramatic and mind-changing out-of-body experience.

At first I leapt (stupidly I now think!) to the obvious conclusion that I must be some kind of spirit or soul that could function without its body and go on to live when it died. I even thought that this experience proved all sorts of paranormal phenomena such as telepathy, clairvoyance and ghosts. These beliefs were so utterly at odds with the science I was learning at Oxford that I became determined to prove all my teachers wrong and to become a parapsychologist.

I succeeded in the latter but not the former. That is, I ended up doing a PhD on the paranormal, and learning – the hard way – that there almost certainly is none. After hundreds of experiments on telepathy that found no telepathy, I returned to my first inspiration, the out-of-body experience and eventually worked out how and why such extraordinary, vivid and life-changing experiences can be explained in naturalistic terms.

It was fairly traumatic having to change my beliefs so drastically, but then that is how science operates.

Again and again people have believed things that were not true and then only been forced to change their minds when the evidence is overwhelming. For me the overwhelming evidence showed that nothing leaves the body during an OBE. The human mind is extraordinary, but not in the way I once thought.

As I worked through these changes I was also exploring my own mind and its capabilities. I explored dreams and lucid dreaming. I tried biofeedback and relaxation techniques. I trained as a witch and a Tarot reader. I took a lot of interesting drugs.

I tried numerous ways of inducing OBEs (not very successfully). And I learned various kinds of meditation. In the end it was Zen that appealed to me enough to take up regular meditation practice and I have been meditating every day for more than twenty years.

During all those years something interesting happened. In my science I was studying the mystery of consciousness through experiments and theory, and in my personal life I was looking directly into that consciousness and seeing that it’s not at all like many scientists claim. Indeed the two threads began to come together with both leading to the idea that self, consciousness and free will are all illusions. So each then motivated, and challenged, the other.

It seems to me now that we will never understand consciousness unless, alongside the neuroscience, we also learn to explore our own minds from the inside. I have chosen to do so through Zen meditation while others use other methods, but the key skills are the same: calming the mind, learning to see its antics more clearly, letting go of thoughts and desires and hopes, and then being able to see clearly enough to ask about the self who is asking.

Whatever the technique, people report that the self seems to disintegrate. What I thought was me was an illusion. There is no lasting, inner self that has consciousness and free will; there is just ….. well, this.

This process is a tough undertaking, requiring hard work and a lot of time. It seems not only to entail intellectual insight but changes the way you think and feel about other people. I would even say it makes kindness and compassion easier. And once embarked upon it feels like a lifetime’s path.

So what should I call this endeavour? I can think of no better name than my “spiritual life”. But if you have a better idea then please tell me, because I still feel uncomfortable using that “spirit” word when I know there is no such thing.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Douglas Chalmers
16 March 2007 at 13:10

Yes, its true that "...we will never understand consciousness unless ......we also learn to explore our own minds from the inside...". That is, after all, where we really exist. In projecting our thoughts endlessly outside of ourselves searching for our wants and desires, we can never truly find ourselves. That is so, even in the most abstract sense.

 

I am disappointed, though, that, along with other pseudo-researchers in medicine and in science, you made your "spiritual" achievements based primarily on drug experiences. The fact that you then presume to call that either Zen or to mask it as Buddhism is all the more indicative that you are still on a path of confusing others if not actually of eventually destroying yourself in the process of your so-called research.

 

I have/had a son who also insisted on trying that path. He was eventually found asleep in the middle of the road and was carted off to hospital by the police. There was no doubt that he had many "out-of-body" experiences , but for many years, it also almost cost him his sanity and he had to depend on lithium medications to help him cope with the awful "hole in his mind" which has opened up as a consequence of drug usage.

 

For myself, though, I have had a few notable out-of-body experiences too but mine were all based on a positive self-induced trance state through diligent practice of a deep form of meditation. There was no going down the street to buy some unknown contaminated substance from the local criminal element - and there was no need to. Then again, I am not like some scientific researchers who can always obtain pure drugs from their medical friends or colleagues, illegal though that is.

 

Again, yes, the "...process is a tough undertaking, requiring hard work and a lot of time. It seems not only to entail intellectual insight but changes the way you think and feel about other people...". I do hope then, that you will see that your research methodology has left a lot to be desired and that posting nonsense like "...I take illegal drugs for inspiration..." makes you more of a menace to society than any kind of genuine investigator of either the paranormal or any other mental or "psychic" experiences.

 

The worst thing about the Western concept of Buddhism is that people are still so attached to their pretentiousness and self-assumed cleverness. It has become so ingrained in them that they are utterly unable to see the world as it really is - such is the nature of their conditioning. They thus assume that they have some important part to play in it and this then becomes their everlasting delusion.

 

Resorting to drugs (even alcohol) only re-inforces such spiritual weaknesses but the that cold fact is that one is already on the road to self-destruction despite one's imagined intellectual prowess. "...Once the trip has begun, there is no escape - no antidote,  no way to stop the journey into the depths of your own mind..." and, one day, you will find that you will be either so misled by the fantasies of psychic phenomena that you will fail to survive in the real world - or, you will become so horrified by the other inner realities that you encounter that you will be torn apart by the forces of your own mind.

 

As interesting as your discoveries in your “spiritual life” happen to be - and they are noteworthy - there are two things you have to finally relinquish, Susan Blackmore, if you want the value of that in any real sense. One is any further use of drugs and the other is to stop legitimising such an erroneous path to others. As it is, as an imagined Buddhist, you must know that you have already incurred quite a lot of negative karma as a result of your wrong path to imagined self-development. Can you turn back now by admitting that and that you have to find a way to do your research without the aid of some chemical crutch?

Podders
25 April 2007 at 12:14

I must say Douglas that I understand your attitude is coloured by an unfortunate personal experience with your son, but I think it is wrong to dismiss completely the use of plants in our spiritual search. Some might say that without them human spiritual awakening might never have happened.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Sue Blackmore is a freelance writer, lecturer and broadcaster, and visiting lecturer at the University of the West of England, Bristol

Recent Posts

Are the Kalash being converted to Islam?

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 04 September 2008

Temples of the Kalasha religion

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 02 September 2008

Pakistan's ancient religion

  • By Maureen Lines
  • 01 September 2008

Will the Dalai Lama return to Tibet?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 29 August 2008

Why did the Dalai Lama ban Dorje Shugden?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 28 August 2008

Are Dalai Lama's critics backed by China?

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 27 August 2008

The deity banned by Dalai Lama

  • By Meindert Gorter
  • 26 August 2008