Return to: Home | Blogs | The Faith Column

Why 'Opposition is True Friendship'

Graham Harvey discusses the relationships that animate animists

In my previous blogs I’ve introduced animism by talking about hedgehogs, computers and cannibals — a fairly unique introduction to a religion I think you’ll agree! I’ve suggested that most people are animists to some degree, just as most of us are humanists to some degree.

Many of us are fairly happy to be called spiritual too (though we might not want to be called “religious”). I suspect that there’ll be stuff in all the New Statesman Faith Column blogs that you’ll agree with as well as stuff that you’ll disagree with. It’s important that we find things to celebrate about each other as well as being clear where we differ.

In his Marriage of Heaven and Hell (1793), William Blake says that “Opposition is true Friendship” and insists that attempts to reconcile difference are likely to “destroy existence”. The diversity of life is diminished when one person tries to convert another to their truth. Whole ways of life disappear when one group imposes their system on others. What Blake sees is that difference is good. He’d have felt at home among the many Native Americans who insist that difference is an invitation rather than a barrier to relationship. René Descartes asserted: “I think therefore I am.” Animists insist: “We greet therefore we are.”

But I want to do more than offer this sermon on diversity! I want to indicate some of the relationships that animate animists while noting ways in which we differ from other people. Quite a few of the blogs on this site pay a lot of attention to a deity or deities. Some don’t seem to be able to define religion without reference to God or similar beings. It is true that many animists are happy to acknowledge the existence of many deities. In fact we might agree that all deities ever venerated might exist in reality (not just as projections of some daft human). Whether you would trust these deities or invite them to your party is an entirely different matter. There are deities who, instead of inviting people to enjoy the world, seem to encourage self-destructive behaviours followed by terrible assaults on others.

Animists aren’t likely to venerate deities who dislike the world or require devotion to the exclusion of all others. They are likely to acknowledge the possible existence of deities in the same way that they acknowledge the existence of many hedgehogs. We aren’t necessarily interested in all hedgehogs, but relate well with this one or this group. (Sorry, do feel free to think about wombats or oaks or eagles or some other being whose presence delights you). Deities greeted regularly by animists are likely to be ones who are willing to give and receive gifts, and to engage with the messy realities of this gloriously physical world. They are part of this world, not above it. But it is possible to be an animist and never knowingly deal with deities.

Next, animists are likely to be concerned about their ancestors and to hope that their ancestors look kindly on them. Ancestors aren’t just dead people, they are our relations who continue to engage with us even after death. It is difficult for Westerners to think properly about ancestors. This is partly because we think death is “the end”. Even when we remain emotionally tied to recently dead relatives, we usually expect them to be removed to heaven or the grave (depending on our ideas about what makes up a human being). Animists are among those currently insisting that it is disrespectful to dig up the dead and treat their remains as inert resources for scientific tests. It is not appropriate to meet the ancestors without greeting them and making gifts to them. Like rocks and wombats, they have their own desires that ought to be heeded.

Animists are likely to avow that humans also share the world with some beings who others have relegated to the pages of mythology or fantasy fiction. Those who think the world is a tame and romantic place may mistakenly think that faeries are cute creatures. Older traditions offer reminders that they are not necessarily nice. Like lions, they may be beautiful to observe from a safe place, but they remain wild creatures who view humans in quite unflattering ways. Who’s to say whose vision is realistic here?

Animism is a religion of embodied beings in a gloriously physical world of profligate diversity. It encourages the careful and cautious building of respectful relationships with our neighbours, human and other-than-human. It encourages local and sensual engagements in life while seeking to honour the larger, global or cosmic, consequences of all actions. Each one of us, in relationship with others, is busy making the world what it is becoming. It is now time to celebrate and enhance the diversity of life.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Douglas Chalmers
12 March 2007 at 19:22

There must have been some reason thousands of years ago why "...respectful relationships with our neighbours, human and other-than-human..." were abandoned and another more self-centred form of living was embraced by mankind. I can't imagine anything less likely to guarantee the human species' survival but that seems to be what has happened. The animist tribes of the past gave way to a more egotisical and individualistic view of the world and all of the troubles and miseries imaginable were made manifest.

Why, then did people embark on this fearful journey which may yet lead us all to extinction? Perhaps the clue is in the term "fear" itself? When one lacks confidence, one of the things that happens is that one becomes afraid of many things and then, consequently, that produces a sense of aloneness. That then marks the person in their own mind as an individual as opposed to being part of an all-inclusive and nurturing natural existence. That engenders a sense of vulnerability which produces the fear state itself.

The result is that the person takes on self-assertive behaviours and eventually becomes aggressive. Amongst others, he or she might even become manipulative. Thus an inferior-feeling person is either overwhelmed by others or develops a mechanism of superiority to mask their fears or assumed inner weakness. The consequences of that are all of the fruitless actions and harmful misdeeds known to the human race throughout time. That sequence and its results will only culminate when mankind finally eliminates any further possibility of his own existence upon the face of this Earth.

I_am_B
30 August 2007 at 19:00

Thank you for this blog! As an animist myself, growing up in a world of western thought, it has been dificult at times to relate to others what I truly believe and feel. Not because I didn't know within myself, but rather, because I didn't know how to relay my thoughts to someone of western conventions. People like Graham Harvey and Daniel Quinn, make that task much more manageable.

My main reason for commenting however, is in regards to the comment left by Mr. Chalmers. While his point and advocacy is clear, may I point out that not all "animist tribes" have been converted to the beliefs of todays commonplace religions (whether forcibly or having been convinced of their ways). And it is the voice of these strong indigenous people that all human citizens of earth should be listening to. May I suggest a hard to find documentary by the name of "Yakoana" to start.

While aboriginal cultures are being cornered and oppressed across the globe, the animist message is spreading. And more and more people are finding it more attractive and (common-sensical) to view our species as any other species of the biological community, nothing more, nothing less.

Peace and Light

-Ryan

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

After the truth

29 May 2009 10:09

Islam's young faithful

18 May 2009 17:33

The Pilgrim Pope

14 May 2009 10:53

Technology, the Latter-day way

12 May 2009 09:45

The Age of the E-church

07 May 2009 12:43

Christianity and the Petri dish

06 May 2009 11:48

Judaism and charity

30 April 2009 16:07

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker