May plays into hands of poppy burning Muslims Against Crusades
Anjem Choudary and his trolling friends like the publicity.
By Steven Baxter Published 11 November 2011 11:33
Muslims Against Crusades, the attention-seeking troublemakers who have burned poppies to enrage people who write for tabloid newspapers, have now been banned.
Whether this move by the Home Secretary Theresa May will get rid of this group's trolling polemic remains to be seen; what's happened before is that the group has simply changed name, kept more or less the same personnel and continued.
Anjem Choudary and his friends are keen to get into the news -- under a previous incarnation of Islam4UK they promised a vigil in the former repatriation town of (Royal) Wootton Bassett, for example. Will anything different happen this time?
The timing is significant. Today is the 11 November, and we are approaching Remembrance Sunday. It is possible that another stunt may have been planned to disrupt the minutes of silence, which are now observed with more scrutiny and participation than was the case ten or 15 years ago, to get the group more hate-headlines and more publicity for their deeply unworthy cause.
What MAC have done, however, shows an unfortunately strong nous for PR, for we are living in a time when we are more sensitive than ever about our symbols of remembrance. After years of playing in football shirts without poppies to mark the week of Remembrance in November, the England team has been involved in a controversy surrounding their presence on the strip this week, with figures such as Prince William, Sepp Blatter of FIFA and Prime Minister David Cameron getting involved.
Poppies mean more to us than they used to -- whether that's a good thing or not is up for debate, but we are more sensitive about these things than we used to be.
As uncomfortable as I am with the idea of anyone provocatively burning anything that people find important or sacred in their culture -- be it a paper flower symbolising fallen heroes or a holy book -- banning MAC plays into their hands.
As with the hastily-withdrawn promise of a march through Wootton Bassett, the thing itself isn't the goal: the headlines and the outrage are the aim, and that has now been achieved. Muslims Against Crusades will be in your newspaper today, on the eleventh day of the eleventh month.
You get the sense that the likes of MAC don't even burn poppies because they want to burn poppies, or talk about marching through Wootton Bassett because they want to march through Wootton Bassett: they're simply picking the totems that will cause the greatest amount of outrage and upset possible.
Who would care about a well organised but completely non-outrageous protest which took place on 11 November? Probably no-one. Probably no-one would cover it either, and there's the problem.
That a few poppy-burning nitwits could manage to garner more coverage than many more Muslims going out to collect for the British Legion, for example, says something about how our priorities have become skewed. We seek out the challenging, the outrageous, the relentlessly controversial, often at the expense of the reasonable, the community-minded, the positive. And I think that's a shame.
What I realise, of course, is that in writing this article about Muslims Against Crusades I've just played into their hands even more, giving them more of the limelight they're so desperate to get.
So instead of that, I think it's time to stop mentioning them altogether, and just let them get on with their sad little protests, putting them in the context of much larger, more positive activity that hardly ever gets a look-in.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















32 comments
@Ian
" I do recall the response in Gaza to 9/11."
and let me guess, you are blissfully unaware of the many many many muslims who condemned 9/11 as a criminal and despicable act?
seriously Ian, go and Google "9 11 condemned by muslims" and prepare to have your illusion shattered.
you ever heard of Gallup (famouns global pollsters)? they found this;
Poll: 93% of Muslims Worldwide Condemn 9/11 Attacks – 0% Approve of Attacks on Religious Grounds
so what do you make of that?
My in-laws have just come back from touring many parts of India.
Without them bringing up the subject they said that most of the local people they met where 'Islamphobes'...and that all had a healthy fear and loathing of Islam...irrational of course...IDL???
I wonder what kind of lefty think tank or media outlet in India might start to castigate these people and tell them they are wrong to fear Islam and that they are misguided? They must be linked to far right parties out there?? INP?
Sigh....what would be more open and honest is that black is black, white is white and the fear of Islam and all it entails is felt by people all over the world. That what we feel is real and not a phobia or something imagined. That we who are fearful of Islam are not bad people and not intrinsically racist or bigots. On the contrary we are freedom loving people who don't
I have have heard it all before, when I see the same marches in the streets I'll believe it. If they had danced in the streets when Osama was killed I might believe it. When they march in there 1000's through London. Manchester, Birmingham etc condemning Choudray, Hamza and their ilk, then I'll believe. Those that condemn in fear of retribution as many muslims did post 9/11 , rather than true belief or disgust, those I'll pity but not believe. The UK Muslim community has had 10 years to form a cohesive voice...yet all we have heard is vile fanaticism.
On the contrary we are freedom loving people who don't want there lives ruled or violated by Islam in any sort of way.
Coleridge -
Didn't realise you represented the opinion of "the Moslem" majority. Do they know about it?
I doubt very much that the views of most could in any way be reconciled with the likes of MAC.
Your a modern day Bernard Manning
Best artcile I have read about how sad and pathetic these groups are.
If no one writes about them, they have no publicity and will become a mere stain, hidden away in the back pages of the history books.
You are totally right. These extreme views are wrongly taken as being representative of the majority of Muslims when they are absolutely not! These groups only become what they are through the disproportionate amount of media coverage ascribed to them. I made the exact point on a yahoo forum just yesterday and surprise, surprise my innocuous comments were removed! It is quite clear to me that much of the media unfortunately chooses to stoke up as much hatred and controversy as these extreme groups. It is highly irresponsible and contributes to unnecessary tensions between communities otherwise living peacefully together.
I agree with you that all these pathetic little groups, like MAC, and fringe parties, like EDL, seek is publcity; no publicity and they simply fade away. The sooner we all stop writing about them the better. But Theresa was right to ban them; if they change their name, then ban them again.
But we should also be careful of an over excessive display of PDC which is counterproductive.
'What I realise, of course, is that in writing this article about Muslims Against Crusades I've just played into their hands even more, giving them more of the limelight they're so desperate to get.'
Exactly. And yet you still did it. But the real media blame came before this. If MAC and the outlandish hype created by a tiny number of extremists had been ignored originally by the media then who would have cared? No-one! The worst that would have happened waould have been a puny bunch of saddos frothing at the mouth and burning poppies in an empty street.
When will the media learn not to go along with these extremist idiots, who are playing them like a fiddle. The best way to deal with them is to starve them of the oxygen of publicity - not ban them. Although in this case it was useful as it also prohibits any more nutty beardie weirdies turning up on the march they were trying to organize.
Exactly the same happened with the mad American Koran burning Pastor with a congregation of 25.
An extremist idiot with a following of practically zero is given world headlines.
@Ian
"I have have heard it all before"
clearly that is a patent lie. you had no idea that the overwhelming majority of the Muslim world condemded 9/11.
then i show you the evidence, and you deny its relevance.
weird and intellectually dishonest of you.
The various incarnations of this group have grown, rather than shrunk when people knew very little about it, certainly if the govmint is going to exclude someone like Bakri from the country the public need to be well informed as to his activites.
Do Nothing didn't work and there is no evidence it will work in the future so it really isn't an option.
@Jerry G
"It is quite obvious what these MAC islamo-fascists have in mind with their poppy burning."
yes it is rather obvious, isn't it.
"If they can provoke some EDL hoodlums to burn some Korans in revenge, the MAC can then start a nice little Jihad war"
no, no, no. that's just too fantastical and unrealistic. their desire is far more mundane and dreary; they just want to be noticed and stir the pot a little. make people big them up, and fear them. in a nut shell; to have our society over-react as much as possible. (the gist of the article as it happens)
so why give them that satisfaction....?
@Mam Tor
I don't think that is a logical post. The point is that Do Nothing wasn't the option being used.
Chowdry has always used the media to generate far more headlines than any of the pathetic incarnations deserved. At least 3 of his previous incarnations have also been banned - to what effect?
Hardly Do Nothing?
Let him howl at the moon and his nutty supporters as much as he likes, but don't fall in to his punblicity trap.
There are always going to be bad people. Just because a few muslims decide to burn some poppies your going to think that all muslims do that? I for one do not agree with what they did but that doesn't mean that all muslims are terroists or want everyone but muslims to burn in hell. You really think that muslims want to be feared? Muslims just want to live in peace why would people want to carry on living in a war?
I haven't seen any Moslems 'collecting for the British Legion.' So far as WW2 is concerned most Moslems supported the Nazis - their key nazi recruiter and collaborator was Haj Amin el Husseini who recruited enthusiastic Moslems into the SS and wiped out all of Bosnia's Jews. I suspect that most Moslems today fully support Chaudhry. If these islamist settlers burn poppies they should be booted out, sent back to their apartheid state of Pakistan where they belong.
Lot of misconceptions there.
Indias Muslims largely fought for the British Allies, along wth the Gurkas and Sikhs in WWII, and they should be remembered too on Remembrance Sunday. Same goes for Malaysia and Singapore and the Middle East largely under French and British control at that time.
The vast majority of Muslims here simply do not support Chowdry but are too reluctant to speak out openly against for their own personal reasons.
And Pakistan is not an apartheid State; it is a failed State.
The Balkan countries like Croatia and Serbia had their own vendettas against both their Jews and Muslims.
The strong communist hand of Tito certainly helped stamp out ethnic cleansing there, until of course the fall of communism and all hell broke out.
The poppy sales are for the Royal British Legion. If this group legitimately purchased the poppies then the charity have gained. If they then wish to burn them...well, so what?
If thine eye offends thee, etc....
The vast majority of Moslems DO support Chaudhry because Racist Islamism is no different from the islamfofascism of Chaoudhry. Pakistan ethnically cleansed millions of innocent Hindus and Sikhs and butchered about a million to create the Moslem supremacist state of Pakistan. They ethnically cleansed all Jews in the late 1940's from Lahore and Karachi. Today they kill Christian politicians, they sentence Christians to death for 'blasphemy' and they ethnically cleanse them. If Pakistan is not a racist apartheid state I don't know what is. Pakistan has no right to exist. it is Moslem-occupied Indian land.
Coleridge - well said.
Mnay many UK Muslims agree with MAC, FOSIS, IFE, MAB and the hundreds of toher Islamic extremist groups openly operating in this country.
Its scary, but true and need to be said again and again.
Let me first say that burning poppies and marching through Wootton Bassett are extreme measures that, whatever you may believe about the justness or not of the West’s wars, cruelly and unnecessarily hurt the wrong people: The families of our war dead, who seem like a soft target for MAC’s scorn.
Mr Baxter is correct in his assumption that these provocative measures are an attempt at getting publicity, but one could say the same about the Occupy movement. The Occupy protesters could’ve marched peacefully through London (or New York or wherever) along a pre-planned, Met-endorsed route, but we wouldn’t be talking about them now, would we? Pitching tents outside St Paul’s is surely as provocative as burning poppies, which is why the Occupy movement has garnered so much support. How many writers at NS would criticise this tactic?
MAC’s unfortunate strategy has severely backfired, partly because most people seem to hate them, but mainly because the press have spent more column inches on the poppy burning and the proposed march than they have discussing the issue MAC are trying to publicise. But then this is a standard approach in our news media when evading an issue.
I cannot bring myself to endorse MAC for the reasons outlined in my first paragraph, but I can’t help wondering: Don’t they have a point?
@ChIron
Ummmmm.... the point of MAC is not to protest about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - the point of MAC is to promote fundamentalist Islamism and the introduction of full blooded Sharia Law.
MAC is just the latest incarnation of Chaudrey's 'vision' of a UK Caliphate using the wars to garner publicity.
So...... no, they don't have a point - or rather they don't have one worth giving any consideration to.
good article.
a few years ago i coined the slogan "Death To Intolerance" exactly for such perceived crisis of free speech.
catchy no?
When are we gonna send these goatfuckers back to whatever shithole they came from?
@ John Woods
'When are we gonna send these goatfuckers back to whatever shithole they came from?'
Welling? There are actually some nice parts there. I've been.
In response to Peely Wally's post - poppies aren't "sold" they are given in recognition of a donation to the British Legion. I expect some people choose to make a donation without claiming a poppy.
Re whatever this tiresome muslim outfit is calling itself today, I don't think there would be so much reaction from non-muslims if moderate muslims were vocal in their condemnation. Sadly, I've yet to meet a moderate muslim or hear any condemnation on the radio/tv.
Quite what Welling has done to deserve an influx of goatfuckers I have no idea. Could someone enlighten me please?
@SUE
Choudrey is from Welling.
Actually there was a counter demonstration by moderate Muslims planned against the MAC dolts had it gone ahead.
Just sayin'
"The vast majority of Muslims here simply do not support Chowdry but are too reluctant to speak out openly against for their own personal reasons."
Do you mean a vile minority terrorising the majority!!!!!!! No, surely their faith would make them stand up and be counted...
Sue - good point/
MAC are just one small part of the extremist Muslim continuum that is Islamic fundamentalism,Islamism or Islamofascism, call it what you will
They are small in number, but have the support of large numbers of UK Muslims, a third to a half of whom support the imposition of sharia law in the UK, the key demand of MAC.
Other extremist Islamic groups such as FOSIS, Islamic Forum of Europe, Muslim Association of Britain etc are equally dangerous..
So yes it is good to ban them, but what is very sad is that so many Muslims tacitly support them and refuse to condemn them utterly.
Never cast a clout till May is out.
It looks like Theresa's days are numbered, after the faux pas.
But the disgraced Fox was being disingenious by raising questions about Olympic Security. It looks like SAMs on standby, countless FBI Agents milling around and the Israelis in their own gated compound with border controls.
One wonders whatever happened to the Olympic Ideal and fairplay and the brotherhood and sisterhood of humankind.
google in Charlene Downes. Islamic respect for women, eh?
It is quite obvious what these MAC islamo-fascists have in mind with their poppy burning. If they can provoke some EDL hoodlums to burn some Korans in revenge, the MAC can then start a nice little Jihad war and hope whoever will send them loads of money.
"Kev Con: I doubt very much that the views of most could in any way be reconciled with the likes of MAC."
But where is this voice of the most? Where is the loud opposition from within the Muslim population? either non existent or terrorised by this so called minority. It really is time for them to come to the fore,,, I'm beginning to doubt their existence... I do recall the response in Gaza to 9/11.
Post new comment