Steven Baxter

Patrolling the murkier waters of the mainstream media

Syndicate contentRSS

War is sport, sport is war

I feel like I’m spoiling all the fun, but I find it distasteful to reduce the Libya campaign to a fo

IT'S WAR. The Sunday Mirror headline said it all. It wasn't quite the barely restrained glee of Chris Morris's presenter on The Day Today announcing the opening of hostilities, but it wasn't a bus ride away from it, either.

You can get a clue to how we see war by how newspapers are selling themselves through their front pages. The news-stands are covered with more explosions than human faces; the bombs are the story, and the message. One cloverleaf-shaped explosion in particular so beautifully conveys the story that it's on five front pages today. The bombs are the stars.

The Sun veered close to "Gotcha!" territory with today's headline, "TOP GUNS 1, MAD DOG 0", superimposed on the blast. This is war as a football match, war as a thing that can be counted in terms of a score. One-nil to us! "We", the Allied forces, are the "Top Guns"; we are Tom Cruise on a brave but necessary mission against one man, The Mad Dog, Muammar al-Gaddafi.

Other newspapers take a different approach. The Independent and Guardian sell themselves on human faces and, in the Guardian's case, the result of those pretty orange bomb clouds: dead bodies. And that brings the reality home. All of a sudden it isn't a cup tie, or a film with a stirring soundtrack where the goodies defeat the baddies, or a distant kaboom on a strip of desert: this is something very real.

Whatever the arguments, or the case for intervention, or the case for intervening in Libya instead of, say, Bahrain or Yemen, this isn't a football match. This isn't a Hollywood film. This isn't one-nil. This isn't half-time. Those beautiful cloverleaf explosions will have people inside them . . . I feel like I'm spoiling everyone's fun, but there it is. I find it a little distasteful to reduce the military campaign to a football score, an away win, a penalty kick.

The Sun was just carrying on the good work from the News of the World yesterday, whose front-page "BLOWN TO BRITS" explosion and cut-out missile carried the same message. Just in case you had any lingering doubts about who was The Bad Guy, the subs helpfully put Gaddafi's face in bright red cross-hairs. To further stoke the jingoism, we were told it was "our boys" who were making the things explode.

This, then, is the tabloid glee of war. Our Boys are attacking The Mad Dog, and it's one-nil already. How can we not support it? How can we not be shocked and awed by the beautiful photos of explosions, the family-friendly pictures, without mangled corpses or that messy business that gets left behind when the clouds disappear? IT'S WAR. War is sport, sport is war. Look away now if you don't want to know the score.

9 comments

John Rutter's picture

You have to be over 85 to have ever been in a real war , where it's kill or be killed . These fiascoes are not war. they are just Western Whitey's strutting their stuff to keep their overpaid un productive tenures.what the hell would your correspondents know about bodies and bits of bodies strewn around. this is the Roman Circus come back as a form of entertainment.just go back to I Love Lucy or the Archers.. basically piss off. John.

Federico's picture

Former Yugoslavia, not to mention Northern Ireland, seem to follow this pattern. Or have they been tranquilized? Just like the foregoing states, Libya may be about to be partitioned. Well it worked in North America and Malaysia. Let's leave Australia and NZ out of it - they used a different solution. And India/Pakistan, well who can say. http://www.diyhomeideas.org/

Victoria Mitchell's picture

The Sun is what George Orwell in "1984" called prolefeed. Proles' thoughts have got to be controlled. They must not be allowed to become politically conscious in any way - so give them the impression that attacking third world countries is great sport and continue the good work of keeping them shy of informed debate. This is the principal role of the tabloid press, so why worry about it now?

Jonathan da Silva's picture

After Iraq and Afghanistan be interested what real role British forces play. Our allies probably take some of our famous cuisine over another Basra.

Adam's picture

But given the pressures on circulation/audience figures, isn't all news treated as entertainment these days? A conscious striving to be more appealing to the reader/viewer and fight for their attention, which can only lead to such headlines.

That said, it's always been like that. So far as I recall, the newspapers have turned every conflict into a game of two sides. From WW2 to Shock and Awe via Argy Bargies, tribes are what sells papers.

Aidan Tuohy's picture

Whereas over at the daily express, it's a nil-one final score. The match hasn't even kicked off yet. It's a different match: Olde England vs. Breussels. "And guess who's paying?" Or is that playing? Not sure if i know either. Still, OKTV! in less than three hours. Now that is good news.

Briar's picture

The Sun offers us a salutary illustration of "British values" at work. We have been warned.

Hugh Markey's picture

Remember-soccer is a game of two halves. And just look at Iraq and Afghanistan.
Former Yugoslavia, not to mention Northern Ireland, seem to follow this pattern. Or have they been tranquilized? Just like the foregoing states, Libya may be about to be partitioned. Well it worked in North America and Malaysia. Let's leave Australia and NZ out of it - they used a different solution. And India/Pakistan, well who can say. Yes, and whatever happened to the 'Mason-Dixie' line?

Frontiersmen

swatantra's picture

War is War and Sport is Sport and war should never be brought into sport. What people want is a clean game, and a clean war, with no outsiders putting their butt in.

Latest tweets