US press: pick of the papers
The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.
1. How Mitt Romney can make the most of his weakness (Washington Post)
Incapable of changing his economic tribe, Romney will need to make the best of his background, says Michael Gerson.
2. The possum Republicans (New York Times)
The grass-roots protesters in the Tea Party and elsewhere have certain policy ideas, but they are not that different from the Republicans in the "establishment," writes David Brooks.
3. Does Obama deserve raves, rants on stimulus? (USA Today)
Most Americans might prefer their president err on the side of boldness the next time the economy needs fixing, says Noam Scheiber.
4. It's a college, not a cloister (New York Times)
Is it really good policy for Santorum to fill young adults with suspicions about higher learning? Frank Bruni asks.
5. White-collar criminals' code: 'It's not my fault' (LA Times)
An armed robber takes his punishment. But the white-collar guys whine, says Barry Goldman.
6. Enough of Rick Santorum's sermons (Washington Post)
Santorum's views on contraception, the role of women, the proper place for religion and what he thinks about education, make him sound like he is running for president in the wrong country, says Richard Cohen.
7. A US-Led Exit Strategy for Assad (Wall Street Journal)
An offer of immunity from prosecution for crimes against humanity if he left Syria would save many lives and deal a blow to Iran, argues Jane Harman.
8. Needs of economy should drive US visa policy (Boston Globe) (£)
US immigration policy should be shaped by a broad vision of what is good for America, and that means bringing policies in line with economic needs, this editorial argues.
9. Talking about Jeremy Lin, without stereotypes (Philadelphia Inquirer)
As diverse a nation as we are, we're still fascinated by examples of racial exceptionalism, writes Annette John-Hall.
10. Welfare reform worked (LA Times)
The success story among poor mothers shows how public policy can reduce poverty by encouraging individuals to work, says Peter H. Schuck.