US press: pick of the papers

The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.

1. Memo to Mitt: The Safety Net Needs Fixing (Wall Street Journal)

Texas ranchers are saving exotic wildlife. Anti-hunting groups want to put them out of business says Alan S. Blinder.

2. Different liberal camps divide progressives (Washington Post)

Conservatives are getting the attention as they duke it out in this GOP primary season. But on a surprising range of issues, there's an important, if quieter, conflict between two progressive camps, wries Fred Hiatt.

3. Severe Conservative Syndrome (New York Times)

Mitt Romney has a gift for words -- self-destructive words, says Paul Krugman.

4. Barack Obama's religion problem (Politico)

I find disquieting parallels between the way Obama handled the recent dust-up with the Catholic Church and contraception and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process a year ago, when he talked about returning to pre-1967 borders, argues Martin Frost.

5. The Strange Career of Voter Suppression (New York Times)

The 2012 general election campaign is likely to be a fight for every last vote, which means that it will also be a fight over who gets to cast one, says Alexander Keyssar.

6. It's rough being the front-runner (Chicago Tribune)

Mitt Romney's recent losses to Rick Santorum in Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota revealed a truism that Romney might want to study -- but not too much! Says Kathleen Parker.

7. Super-PAC politics drags in the Obama campaign (Detroit Free Press)

t's a damned if you do or don't situation, but we'd really prefer President Barack Obama did not indulge the super-PAC madness unleashed by an awful 2009 Supreme Court decision, says Kurt Strazdins.

8. A positive grade for integration aid plan (Star Tribune)

Task force strikes good balance between support, accountability, says this editorial.

9. Our make-believe federal budget (Politico)

Many people inside the Washington Beltway will be pouring through President Barack Obama's Fiscal 2013 budget proposal to find out what he proposes to cut, what initiatives he plans to invest in and what new policies he might propose, writes David M. Walker.

10. Immigration, deportation -- and no right to return? (Los Angeles Times)

The Justice Department says that deported immigrants who win their cases on appeal can return to the U.S. But it appears that's not true, says this editorial.

FERENC ISZA/AFP/Getty
Show Hide image

This is a refugee crisis, and it has always been a refugee crisis

If your country is in flames and your life is at risk, boarding a rickety, dangerous boat is a rational decision. We need to provide safer choices and better routes.

Even those of us all too familiar with the human cost of the present refugee crisis were stopped in our tracks by the profoundly disturbing images of the dead toddler washed up on a Turkish beach. Whatever our personal view about the ethics of displaying the photographs, one thing is clear: the refugee crisis on our doorstep can no longer be denied or ignored.

For far too long the political conversation in the UK has avoided facing up to the obvious conclusion that the UK must provide protection to more refugees in this country. Ministers have responded to calls to do more by talking about the aid we are providing to help refugees in the region, by blaming other European Governments who are hosting more refugees than we are, and also accusing refugees themselves by claiming the desperate people forced into boarding unsafe boats in the Mediterranean were chancers and adventurers, out for an easier life.

These latest images have blown all that away and revealed the shaming truth. This is a refugee crisis and has always been a refugee crisis. When the Refugee Council wrote to the prime minister in 2013 to call for the UK to lead on resettling Syrian refugees displaced by a war that was already two years old, it was a refugee crisis in the making.

Many people struggle to comprehend why refugees would pay smugglers large sums of money to be piled into a rickety boat in the hope of reaching the shores in Europe. The simple answer is that for these individuals, there is no other choice. If your country is in flames and your life is at risk, boarding that boat is a rational decision. There has been much vitriol aimed at smugglers who are trading in human misery, but European governments could put them out of business if they created alternative, legal routes for refugees to reach our shores.

There are clear steps that European governments, including our own, can take to help prevent people having to risk their lives. We need to offer more resettlement places so that people can be brought directly to countries of safety. We also need to make it easier for refugees to reunite with their relatives already living in safety in the UK. Under current rules, refugees are only allowed to bring their husband or wife and dependant children under the age of 18. Those that do qualify for family reunion often face long delays living apart, with usually the women and children surviving in desperate conditions while they wait for a decision on their application. Sometimes they are refused because they cannot provide the right documentation. If you had bombs raining down on your house, would you think to pick up your marriage certificate?

The time to act is well overdue, but the tide of public opinion seems to be turning – especially since the release of the photographs. We urgently need David Cameron to show political leadership and help us live up to the proud tradition of protecting refugees that he often refers to. That tradition is meaningless if people cannot reach us, if they are dying in the attempt. It is a shame that it had to take such a tragic image to shake people into calling for action, but for many it means that the crisis is no longer out of sight and out of mind.

Maurice Wren is the chief executive of the Refugee Council