US Press: pick of the papers

The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.

1. Romney Wins Iowa Caucus by 8 Votes (New York Times)

In the first Republican contest of the season, the top two candidates were separated by only a sliver of votes, offering Rick Santorum a chance to emerge as the alternative to Mitt Romney, writes Jeff Zeleny.

2. Pull the parachute (Boston Globe)

Jeff Jacoby argues that with Congress's approval rating barely above single digits, you might think support for a modest one-time Congressional pay cut would be a no-brainer.

3. California Legislature has plenty to do in 2012 (San Fransciso Chronicle)

California legislators passed, and Gov. Jerry Brown signed, 745 measures last year, but they still left themselves plenty of critical work to do, argues this Editorial.

4. A small sign of progress toward Mideast peace (Washington Post)

Envoys meet, but the odds remain against real movement toward a deal, signals the Editorial Board.

5. Legal Fight for Mother of Suspect in Arsons (New York Times)

Investigators are looking into the possibility that the man accused in an arson spree acted because his mother faced the prospect of being sent back to Germany, writes Ian Lovett.

6. Iran threatens U.S. ships, alarms oil markets (Washington Post)

U.S. officials attribute Tuesday's harsh language to Iran's growing frustration over its faltering economy Joby Warrick and Steven Mufson write.

7. China Takes Aim at U.S. Naval Might (Wall Street Journal) ($)

China is building a new class of ballistic missiles designed to arc through the stratosphere and explode onto the deck of a U.S. aircraft carrier, potentially forcing U.S. carriers to stay farther away from its shores argue Julian E. Barnes, Nathan Hodge and Jeremy Page.

8. Post-Iowa, GOP prospects promising (Washington Times)

Grover G. Norquist argues that what matters now is what each candidate would do within the executive branch. 'Will they commit to undo the Obama and Bill Clinton (and some George W. Bush) executive orders that expanded government?' he asks.

9. The high art of disenfranchisement (Miami Herald)

The Miami Herald Editorial believe the Justice Department should start in Florida on its review of new voting laws, rights restoration.

10. Minnesota must battle against anti-Somali bigotry (Star Tribune)

Hussein Samatar is concerned that Somalis are being singled out in Minnesota.

GETTY
Show Hide image

Stephen Hawking's enthusiasm for colonising space makes him almost as bad as Trump

The physicist's inistence on mankind's expansion risks making him a handmaiden of inequality.

“Spreading out may be the only thing that saves us from ourselves,” Stephen Hawking has warned. And he’s not just talking about surviving the UK's recent run of record breaking heat. If humanity doesn’t start sending people to Mars soon, then in a few hundred years he says we can all expect to be kaput; there just isn’t enough space for us all.

The theoretical physicist gave his address to the glittering Starmus Festival of science and arts in Norway. According to the BBC, he argued that climate change and the depletion of natural resources help make space travel essential. With this in mind, he would like to see a mission to Mars by 2025 and a new lunar base within 30 years.

He even took a swipe at Donald Trump: “I am not denying the importance of fighting climate change and global warming, unlike Donald Trump, who may just have taken the most serious, and wrong, decision on climate change this world has seen.”

Yet there are striking similarities between Hawking's statement and the President's bombast. For one thing there was the context in which it was made - an address to a festival dripping with conspicuous consumption, where 18 carat gold OMEGA watches were dished out as prizes.

More importantly there's the inescapable reality that space colonisation is an inherently elitist affair: under Trump you may be able to pay your way out of earthly catastrophe, while for Elon Musk, brawn could be a deciding advantage, given he wants his early settlers on Mars to be able to dredge up buried ice.

Whichever way you divide it up, it is unlikely that everyone will be able to RightMove their way to a less crowded galaxy. Hell, most people can’t even make it to Starmus itself (€800  for a full price ticket), where the line-up of speakers is overwhelmingly white and male.

So while this obsession with space travel has a certain nobility, it also risks elevating earthly inequalities to an interplanetary scale.

And although Hawking is right to call out Trump on climate change, the concern that space travel diverts money from saving earth's ecosystems still stands. 

In a context where the American government is upping NASA’s budget for manned space flights at the same time as it cuts funds for critical work observing the changes on earth, it is imperative that the wider science community stands up against this worrying trend.

Hawking's enthusiasm for colonising the solar system risks playing into the hands of the those who share the President destructive views on the climate, at the expense of the planet underneath us.

India Bourke is an environment writer and editorial assistant at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496