US Press: pick of the papers

The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.

1. A State of the Possible plan for Obama (Los Angeles Times)

Given the likelihood of resistance from Republicans in Congress, the president should devote his energies to meaningful but less polarizing measures that could help the economy, says this editorial.

2. How Gingrich's unruly mind could benefit Obama (Washington Post)

Where is the Democratic Gingrich? Asks Richard Cohen.

3. Newtzilla conquers all? (Los Angeles Times)

Newt Gingrich has remarkable healing powers, and his atomic breath is formidable. Will it be enough? Asks Jonah Goldberg.

4. Romney and the Burden of Double Taxation (Wall Street Journal)

The disclosure of tax returns can be a teachable moment for the GOP candidates, John Berlau and Trey Kovacs argue.

5. Newt Gingrich is no Saul Alinsky (Politico)

If Saul Alinsky weren't already dead, he'd die to get a piece of Newt Gingrich, writes Nicholas Von Hoffman.

6. Obama needs fiscal 'courage' (USA Today)

The president's State of the Union Tuesday night, and his budget submission to follow, could be his last chance to rally the country behind needed reform, argues Sen. Jeff Sessions.

7. SOTU or campaign speech? (Politico)

The congressional podium is not a campaign stump, writes Reince Priebus.

8. TSA's intrusions undermine security (Washington Times)

Senator or not, we're all stripped of our freedom and dignity, says Sen. Rand Paul.

9. On this night, boring Mr. Safe was brilliant (New York Post)

The prospect of being flattened by the Newt Gingrich steamroller wonderfully concentrated Mitt Romney's mind during last night's NBC debate, says John Podhoretz.

10. Romney Can't Rumble (New York Times)

Mitt Romney just doesn't know how to rumble, argues Charles M. Blow.

Getty
Show Hide image

Leave.EU is backing a racist President - why aren't more Brexiteers condemning it?

Our own homegrown Trump trumpeters. 

The braver Republican politicians are condemning Donald Trump after he backtracked on his condemnation of far-right protestors in Charlottesville. “You had a group on one side and group on the other,” said the US president of a night in which an anti-fascist protestor was run over. Given the far-right protestors included neo-Nazis, it seems we’re heading for a revisionist history of the Second World War as well. 

John McCain, he of the healthcare bill heroics, was one of the first Republicans to speak out, declaring there was “no moral equivalency between racists and Americans standing up to defy hate and bigotry”. Jeb Bush, another former presidential hopeful, added: “This is a time for moral clarity, not ambivalence.”

In the UK, however, Leave.EU, the campaign funded by Ukip donor Arron Banks, fronted by Nigel Farage, tweeted: “President Trump, an outstanding unifying force for a country divided by a shamefully blinkered liberal elite.” A further insight into why Leave.EU has come over so chirpy may be gleaned by Banks’s own Twitter feed. “It was just a punch up with nutters on all sides,” is his take on Charlottesville. 

Farage’s support for Trump – aka Mr Brexit – is well-known. But Leave.EU is not restricted to the antics of the White House. As Martin Plaut recently documented in The New Statesman, Leave.EU has produced a video lauding the efforts of Defend Europe, a boat organised by the European far-right to disrupt humanitarian rescues of asylum seekers crossing the dangerous Mediterranean Sea. There are also videos devoted to politicians from “patriotic" if authoritarian Hungary – intriguing for a campaign which claims to be concerned with democratic rights.

Mainstream Brexiteers can scoff and say they don’t support Leave.EU, just as mainstream Republicans scoffed at Trump until he won the party’s presidential nomination. But the fact remains that while the official Brexit campaign, Vote Leave, has more or less retired, Leave.EU has more than 840,000 Facebook followers and pumps out messages on a daily basis not too out of sync with Trump’s own. There is a feeling among some Brexiteers that the movement has gone too far. "While Leave.EU did great work in mobilising volunteers during their referendum, their unnecessarily robust attacks and campaigning since has bordered on the outright racist and has had damaged the Brexit cause," one key Leave supporter told me. 

When it comes to the cause of Brexit, many politicians chose to share a platform with Leave.EU campaigners, including Labour’s Kate Hoey and Brexit secretary David Davis. Some, like Jacob Rees-Mogg, get cheered on a regular basis by Leave.EU’s Facebook page. Such politicians should choose this moment to definitively reject Leave.EU's advances. If not, then when? 

Julia Rampen is the digital news editor of the New Statesman (previously editor of The Staggers, The New Statesman's online rolling politics blog). She has also been deputy editor at Mirror Money Online and has worked as a financial journalist for several trade magazines.