US Press: pick of the papers
The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.
1. Care To Meet for a Cheap Drink? (Slate)
Jacob Weisber on what he learned from Christopher Hitchens.
2. Iraq war divided America but freed millions from Saddam (New York Daily News)
"Welcome home. Welcome home. Welcome home."
3. Gingrich's invented history (Politico)
Republican frontrunner Newt Gingrich's recent remarks that the Palestinians are an "invented" people, all of whom are "terrorists," are far from historical truth- but more damaging than Gingrich's rewriting of history is the negative effect of his political posturing, writes Wendy Chamberlin.
4. Iowa Republican debate: Newt's still on top, Romney steadies himself (Washington Post)
E.J. Dionne Jr. on Thursday's debate in Sioux City, Iowa.
5. Obama's hubris is obvious in conflicting statements (Omaha World Herald)
President Barack Obama doesn't suffer from amnesia, but he apparently hopes the public does, writes Cal Thomas.
6. New clinic rules will harm women's health (Philadelphia Inquirer)
Gov. Corbett should carefully consider the consequences and refuse to sign legislation that would roll back women's ability to obtain safe abortions.
7. Huntsman? Stranger things have happened (Denver Post)
All things seem possible in the Republican presidential contest- so, E.J. Dionne asks, is there another turn coming that could benefit Jon Huntsman?
8. No way to conduct people's business (Miami Herald)
In the usual frenzy before the holidays, lawmakers in Washington have once again packed a variety of questionable proposals - including one affecting travel to Cuba - into a huge bundle of legislation.
The latest scare tactic by right-wing opponents of the Affordable Care Act aims at convincing Americans that reasonable trims in Medicare spending will make it very difficult for seniors to find a good doctor in coming years, according to Wayne Madsen.
10. Obama foreign policy: When 'reset' means setbacks (Oregonian)
Obama demonstrated decisiveness in killing Osama bin Laden, but forgoing a non-option says nothing about the soundness of one's foreign policy, writes Charles Krauthammer.