Herman Cain struggles to recall details of Libya conflict

"Got all this stuff twirling around in my head," says Republican presidential hopeful.

 

 

Hot on the heels of Rick Perry's "Oops" moment (when he couldn't recall the name of the third government agency he was going to axe), Herman Cain has provided his very own YouTube hit, apparently struggling to recall what took place in Libya.

Asked by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel whether he agreed with President Obama's actions in Libya, the former Godfather's Pizza CEO looked at the ceiling, shut his eyes and said "Okay, Libya," before closing his eyes for 11 seconds. After double checking with the interviewer whether Obama supported the removal of Muammar Gaddafi, he said that he disagreed with the way it was handled -- but then stopped himself, saying "No, that's a different one."

Jerry Gordon, Cain's spokesman, has defended his candidate, saying: "The video is being taken out of context. He was taking questions for about 30 to 40 minutes on four hours of sleep." But this is a poor excuse for someone hoping to be president of America.

Cain's inability to answer a direct, simple question about foreign policy has stunned many pundits. After his gaffe, Perry's poll count dropped even lower, to around 4 per cent. Cain -- already battling sexual harassment allegations -- will be hoping he does not see a similar effect.

Samira Shackle is a freelance journalist, who tweets @samirashackle. She was formerly a staff writer for the New Statesman.

Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

Britain is running out of allies as it squares up to Russia

For whatever reason, Donald Trump is going to be no friend of an anti-Russia foreign policy.

The row over Donald Trump and that dossier rumbles on.

Nothing puts legs on a story like a domestic angle, and that the retired spy who compiled the file is a one of our own has excited Britain’s headline writers. The man in question, Christopher Steele, has gone to ground having told his neighbour to look after his cats before vanishing.

Although the dossier contains known errors, Steele is regarded in the intelligence community as a serious operator not known for passing on unsubstantiated rumours, which is one reason why American intelligence is investigating the claims.

“Britain's role in Trump dossier” is the Telegraph’s splash, “The ‘credible’ ex-MI6 man behind Trump Russia report” is the Guardian’s angle, “British spy in hiding” is the i’s splash.

But it’s not only British headline writers who are exercised by Mr Steele; the Russian government is too. “MI6 officers are never ex,” the Russian Embassy tweeted, accusing the UK of “briefing both ways - against Russia and US President”. “Kremlin blames Britain for Trump sex storm” is the Mail’s splash.

Elsewhere, Crispin Blunt, the chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, warns that relations between the United Kingdom and Russia are as “bad as they can get” in peacetime.

Though much of the coverage of the Trump dossier has focused on the eyecatching claims about whether or not the President-Elect was caught in a Russian honeytrap, the important thing, as I said yesterday, is that the man who is seven days from becoming President of the United States, whether through inclination or intimidation, is not going to be a reliable friend of the United Kingdom against Russia.

Though Emanuel Macron might just sneak into the second round of the French presidency, it still looks likely that the final choice for French voters will be an all-Russia affair, between Francois Fillon and Marine Le Pen.

For one reason or another, Britain’s stand against Russia looks likely to be very lonely indeed.

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to British politics.