Star Spangled Staggers

US politics from outside the beltway

Syndicate contentRSS

"If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself!"

Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain adds to his growing list of gaffes.

 

Herman Cain, surprise front-runner in the race to become the Republican candidate in next year's presidential election, has said he believes the Occupy Wall Street protests were "planned and orchestrated to distract from the failed policies of the Obama administration".

Cain made the comments -- which he admitted he couldn't "back-up" with "facts" -- in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, broadcast yesterday. He went on to say that individuals, rather than Wall Street or the major banks, were to blame for poverty and unemployment in the United States: "if you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself."

In response to the interviewer's suggestion that the financial services industry was partly responsible for the 2008 economic crash, Cain said:

But we're not in 2008, we're in 2011. Yes they had a big part to do with it, and obviously you could go back and say 'what did the banks do to do this', but these demonstrations, I honestly don't understand what they are looking for. To me they come across more as anti-capitalism.

This is the latest in a series of gaffes by Cain, the former CEO of Godfather's Pizza. In a discussion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on Fox News earlier in the year, he appeared not to understand the issue of the Palestinian right of return -- a crucial sticking point in negotiations between the two sides. He has also said he would not be "comfortable" having a Muslim in his cabinet.

18 comments

Livers's picture

Man, he makes Sarah Palin look good. Only in America, eh?

geoff's picture

@Luddite

You so right man, what we need now is more greed more capatalism and more neoliberalism; its done us so well thus far huh...

lol get off cloud cookooland you dick

Freeman2's picture

geoff - It's bad manners to laugh at a man when he is masturbating.

qaz's picture

Yeah its our fault, that even as independent retail investors the interbanks plot to swing the markets around and drain our accounts.. hokay, makes sense to me.

cg's picture

This is why America is losing it place in this world.This kind of thinking is destroying America

tony montana's picture

Stupid idle thinking statement if you dont have a job blame yourself what planet this this guy come from.The government in britain are cuting jobs in the public sector , cuting peoples hours, while the parasites in parliament enjoying good pensions, and salarys, Please uk government dont incite another riot.coalition government i give you another year.You are crooked Hyporcytes.

swatantra's picture

I don't think anyone woud be comfortable having Citizen Cain in their Cabinet. But he is right on one thing: There is no HR to a job or lots of money. You have to earn it.

Trevor's picture

Just another devil-take-the-hindmost apologist for capitalism's failure to meet the needs of the majority blaming its victims.

He'll go far.

Luddite's picture

Now what's wrong with what he said. Some are bone-idle and constantly blame others for their own short-comings and lack of success. The innate problem with Socialism is that in practice people won't work to do their best because their specific personal results are the same whether they do well or whether they barely do enough to get by. So we all end up suffering from the community gravitating towards the lowest common denominator.

Trevor's picture

@Luddite:

Presumably by "socialism" you mean the failed state capitalist tyrannies of the defunct Soviet Union and its clones, China, Cuba etc. Or do you mean the equally failed reformist parties of the left (e.g. the amusingly named "Labour" Party) with their laughable claims to be abolishing capitalism while busy transforming themselves into just another pro-free market party?

Genuine socialism has never existed; namely a society based upon voluntary cooperation, devoid of the class system, wage labour, money and the state itself.

No doubt you will dismiss this interpretation as merely pie-in-the-sky utopianism; in which case where does that leave your claim that socialism has existed for the last 100 years?

Dan Ladds's picture

"The innate problem with Socialism is that in practice people won't work to do their best because their specific personal results are the same whether they do well or whether they barely do enough to get by."

There are plently of people who, under Capitalism, do the bare minimum required to not get sacked. Many on fixed salaries scrape through the day in a demoralised state because they don't feel invested in what they do.

At least under Socialism you're working with the knowledge that you're benefiting yourself and your fellow workers, rather than just making investors rich.

Plus, a quick look at the voluntary sector tells us that there are people who will put in effort because of pure pride in their work.

Not only this, but equal pay under Socialism allows people to choose a job that they want to do, rather than the job that pays best currently.

Mel Davis's picture

Uncle Tom.

Bill's picture

Socialism always produces a parasitic bureaucracy that is impossible to control. The proof of the pudding will be the demise of Europe and American pensions.

John Cheese's picture

Cain confounds: Black while conservative, politcal outsider w/business experience disrupting old-boy network. US media in a tizzy trying to frame the irony. O'bummer has massively divided the US: libertarians vs socialists while spending 3 generations ahead. Rough political waters ahead for the next few years.

NucMed's picture

Or as the Onion had it above a photo of Steve Jobs ......

"Last American Who Knew What The Fuck He Was Doing Dies"

Sums it all up really ....

Hayward's picture

Mr Cheese.
It started well before the current incumbent in the White House.

In fact citizens of the USA can thank the blessed, probably never now to make sainted, Ronald.

Fo was it not the Republicans under Reagan with Reaganomics that caused the US economy to start down an ever increasing slippery slope from creditor to debtor nation.

In 1981, shortly after taking office,The Gipper complained of "runaway deficits" that were then approaching US$80 billion, or about 2.5% GDP. But within only two years his policies had succeeded in enlarging the deficit to more than US$200 billion, or 6 % GDP.

At the end of the Reagan/Bush era it was down to US$150 billion, still almost double what it had been under Carter. However the National Debt had  climbed from US$995 billion, when Reagan took office, to $4 trillion by the end of Bush1's presidency. Reagan and Bush Administrations increased it as a % GDP from 26% to 42%.,

Clinton managed hold/wind back both of them in returning the budget to a surplus of some US$280 billion and reducing the National Debt to 35%
GDP..

But George, The Faux Texan and late unlamented encumbrance in the White House, even managed to outdo "The Gipper" and his own Dad.

He set another unenviable record. The deficit was to be $482 billion in the 2009 budget moving from black to red ink in the order of US$750 billion from the end of Clinton's term.

Partly caused by the Iraq Fiasco and the Afghan Imbroglio, The Three Trillion Dollar War. This the only conflict since the War of Independence to be fought on credit.

Next came the Wall Street Tsunami which washed over the world and led to the GFC, the Global Financial Chicken that came home to roost.

It was also under The Faux Texan that the US debt limit was raised seven times.

All of which left a huge and noisome pile of economic, financial and fiscal ordure for any incoming whether Administration, Democrat or Republican.

So much so that currently the USA needs to borrow about 40% of the funds needed to keep the it running.

It is interesting to note that from 1978-2005 with 2 Democratic and 5 Republican Administrations that;

Democratic  Federal Spending up by 9.9%. Federal Debt by 4.2%, GDP by 12.6%.

Republican Federal Spending up 12.1%, Federal Debt by 36.4% , GDP by  10.7%

Luddite's picture

Dan Ladds: Like i said "the lowest common denominator" Capitalism is based on greed, but Socialism is based on wishful thinking and good intentions, and we all know where good intentions often leads...

Luddite's picture

Trevor: "Just another devil-take-the-hindmost apologist for capitalism's failure to meet the needs of the majority blaming its victims"...

TREVOR: Have you leaned nothing from 100 years of Socialism. It's Capitalism that meets the needs of the majority. It's Socialism that doesn't. Socialism just shares out the misery more equally..

Latest tweets