US Press: pick of the papers

The ten must-read opinion pieces from today's US papers.

1. The Obama Presidency by the Numbers (Wall Street Journal)

The president constantly reminds us that he was dealt a difficult hand. But the evidence is overwhelming that he played it poorly, writes Michael J. Boskin.

2. What the doctor ordered (Los Angeles Times)

Patients should know if their doctors get paid by drug firms, argue Tracy Weber and Charles Ornstein.

3. A new way to remember 9/11 (Denver Post)

Ten years ago Sunday, Lynne Steuerle Schofield lost her mother, Norma Lang Steuerle, when American Airlines Flight 77 was flown into the Pentagon.

4. Romney 1, Perry 0 (Washington Post)

Following the first debate, Michael Gerson considers the ex-Governor of Massachusetts the more authentic Republican presidential candidate.

5. India could be way out of Afghan war (Chicago Sun Times)

Something new needs to be injected into Afghan policy, writes this editorial; and it could come from New Delhi.

6. Squeezing Syria (Washington Post)

A WP editorial argues that tougher sanctions could help save the lives of innocents.

7. Casino bill is deeply flawed; rank and file should kill it (Boston Globe)

The long-awaited gambling compromise endorsed by Governor Patrick and legislative leaders is deeply flawed, full of the kind of special deals Patrick had warned against, claims this editorial.

8. Do We Still Need the Patriot Act? (New York Times) ($)

In 2001, in the weeks after Sept. 11, the law passed through Congress easily. But, asks this editorial debate, has it protected us?

9. Prison Progress (Detroit Free Press)

Maybe you were too busy firing up the grill for the holiday weekend to notice, says Jeff Gerrit, but Michigan's prison population dropped to the lowest level in 13 years last Friday.

10. Ideas for the mayor, big and small (Chicago Tribune)

Mayor Rahm Emanuel asked for it: Ideas on how to close the city's $635.7 million budget deficit, courtesy of Chicago Tribune readers.

Getty
Show Hide image

Leave.EU is backing a racist President - why aren't more Brexiteers condemning it?

Our own homegrown Trump trumpeters. 

The braver Republican politicians are condemning Donald Trump after he backtracked on his condemnation of far-right protestors in Charlottesville. “You had a group on one side and group on the other,” said the US president of a night in which an anti-fascist protestor was run over. Given the far-right protestors included neo-Nazis, it seems we’re heading for a revisionist history of the Second World War as well. 

John McCain, he of the healthcare bill heroics, was one of the first Republicans to speak out, declaring there was “no moral equivalency between racists and Americans standing up to defy hate and bigotry”. Jeb Bush, another former presidential hopeful, added: “This is a time for moral clarity, not ambivalence.”

In the UK, however, Leave.EU, the campaign funded by Ukip donor Arron Banks, fronted by Nigel Farage, tweeted: “President Trump, an outstanding unifying force for a country divided by a shamefully blinkered liberal elite.” A further insight into why Leave.EU has come over so chirpy may be gleaned by Banks’s own Twitter feed. “It was just a punch up with nutters on all sides,” is his take on Charlottesville. 

Farage’s support for Trump – aka Mr Brexit – is well-known. But Leave.EU is not restricted to the antics of the White House. As Martin Plaut recently documented in The New Statesman, Leave.EU has produced a video lauding the efforts of Defend Europe, a boat organised by the European far-right to disrupt humanitarian rescues of asylum seekers crossing the dangerous Mediterranean Sea. There are also videos devoted to politicians from “patriotic" if authoritarian Hungary – intriguing for a campaign which claims to be concerned with democratic rights.

Mainstream Brexiteers can scoff and say they don’t support Leave.EU, just as mainstream Republicans scoffed at Trump until he won the party’s presidential nomination. But the fact remains that while the official Brexit campaign, Vote Leave, has more or less retired, Leave.EU has more than 840,000 Facebook followers and pumps out messages on a daily basis not too out of sync with Trump’s own. There is a feeling among some Brexiteers that the movement has gone too far. "While Leave.EU did great work in mobilising volunteers during their referendum, their unnecessarily robust attacks and campaigning since has bordered on the outright racist and has had damaged the Brexit cause," one key Leave supporter told me. 

When it comes to the cause of Brexit, many politicians chose to share a platform with Leave.EU campaigners, including Labour’s Kate Hoey and Brexit secretary David Davis. Some, like Jacob Rees-Mogg, get cheered on a regular basis by Leave.EU’s Facebook page. Such politicians should choose this moment to definitively reject Leave.EU's advances. If not, then when? 

Julia Rampen is the digital news editor of the New Statesman (previously editor of The Staggers, The New Statesman's online rolling politics blog). She has also been deputy editor at Mirror Money Online and has worked as a financial journalist for several trade magazines.