The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

A railway omnishambles proves Miliband's point

West Coast rail contract scrapped after "significant flaws" in the bidding process.

A Virgin train passes along the West Coast mainline route near Abington.
A Virgin train passes along the West Coast mainline route near Abington. Photograph: Getty Images.

One of the most powerful sections of Ed Miliband's speech came when, with remarkable fluency, he declared of the government: "Have you ever seen a more incompetent, hopeless, out of touch, U-turning, pledge breaking, make it up as you go along, back-of-the-envelope, miserable shower?" Less than a day later, ministers have demonstrated exactly what he meant.

The Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin has announced that the decision to award the West Coast Main Line rail franchise to FirstGroup has been cancelled after the discovery of "significant technical flaws" in the bidding process. The government will no longer challenge the judicial review sought by Virgin, the current operator, which has long argued that the process did not adequately assess the risks of competing bids (it warned that FirstGroup's £5.5bn bid was a recipe for bankruptcy). According to McLoughlin, the reopening of the bids will cost the taxpayer "in the region of £40m".

The staff involved have been suspended from the Department from Transport and two independent reviews, one into what went wrong with the West Coast competition and the other into the wider franchise bidding process, have been launched. What makes this particularly damaging for the government is that Labour had previously called for the contract to be halted in order to allow such a review to take place.

McLoughlin said:

I have had to cancel the competition for the running of the West Coast franchise because of deeply regrettable and completely unacceptable mistakes made by my department in the way it managed the process.

A detailed examination by my officials into what happened has revealed these flaws and means it is no longer possible to award a new franchise on the basis of the competition that was held.

I have ordered two independent reviews to look urgently and thoroughly into the matter so that we know what exactly happened and how we can make sure our rail franchise programme is fit for purpose.

The government will now likely transfer responsibility for the running of the line to the state-owned Directly Operated Railways, which took over the East Coast Main Line in 2009. Labour has called for the government to immediately halt the planned privatisation of the latter. Indeed, with 15 rail franchises due to be awarded before the general election, the argument for full renationalisation has been immeasurably strengthened.

10 comments

Davidaslindsay's picture

There is only one destination here. Renationalisation.

Come on, Ed. Say it.

Dark Heart of Toryland's picture

This throws some very revealing light on the costs of flogging the franchises. Presumably, the £40 million cost is typical of these procedures. That's an awful lot which could be better spent on actually improving the railway system - or even on keeping down fares - which is instead spent on deciding who gets to be the Fat Controller.

Des Demona's picture

We should privatise the M1 motorway. Everyone in the country gets one square foot for a quid which they can then sell to the highest bidder. Eventually some of the more well off investors could accumalate several miles of motorway which they could then charge extortionate fees for people to use.
I of course would supply the technology needed to pay for trips over different investors road miles ( at a modest cost)

Crazy idea? At least as much sense as privatising railways.

Davyh's picture

Wed, 2012-10-03 10:14 — DonBak (not verified)
Had the deal gone ahead, fares would have had to increase to keep the company afloat. No sensible body would have accepted such a high bid. I am firmly convinced the civil service is riddled with 'Labour placements'.

ROFL ...... its all Labours fault !!

Will you CONservatives ever accept the blame for anything?

DonB's picture

Perhaps leaving well alone might be a fair option!

Fats's picture

"The government will now likely transfer responsibility for the running of the line to the state-owned Directly Operated Railways ... "

Or, to put it another way -

"Coalition nationalises railway"

DonBak's picture

Had the deal gone ahead, fares would have had to increase to keep the company afloat. No sensible body would have accepted such a high bid. I am firmly convinced the civil service is riddled with 'Labour placements'.

Gareth's picture

Well just as long as you're "firmly convinced"... Although I do wonder on what basis you've reached that conclusion - would you care to enlighten us?

bill23's picture

This was no mistake. The corruption in the civil self-service starts at local council level where councillors manipulate planning (often with the help of Freemasons), so that they can get their bunce - the keys to your flat in Spain will be in the envolope Mr Council-Conman.

If we allow corruption at local level then we should expect every other part of the civil service to take their slice.

Barrie J's picture

Once upon a time, not so long ago, there was this councillor.
It embarrasses me to say which Party, on the Planning Committee (and several others).
Seemingly good sort, life and soul, hail fellow well met, always first up to the bar, retired now, house here, villa in Spain.
I did some work for a 'development guy' recently, seems we had a mutual acquaintance - retired now, villa in Spain, etc.
The price asked £15k for the nod.
Obviously the developer just fed it into the cost, why wouldn't he?
Is £15k the going rate or did my fellow fall short?

Latest tweets