Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers

1. The prime minister's masterclass in how not to conduct a reshuffle (Observer)
David Cameron failed most of the 10 tests on whether recasting a government has any serious point, says Andrew Rawnsley

2. Dave's great plan to save us all is a loft conversion (Mail on Sunday)
Halfway through the coalition government, we don't know what Cameron is for, says Suzanne Moore

3. David Cameron's Twitter reshuffle has big ambitions (Telegraph)
And the Lib Dems are remarkably chipper, writes Matthew d'Ancona

4. Whitehall dares to whisper: we're out of recession (Mail on Sunday)
At the top of the coalition they believe the tide is turning, says James Forsyth 

5. Are you radical or reactionary, Mr Cameron (Telegraph)
With fresh thinking, the Conservative Party can finally become modern, says Janet Daley

6. Tories start to fear Cameron is a loser (Sunday Times £)
The reshuffle was meant to signal "we mean business" says Martin Ivens

7. Yes, thank you Naomi, we've all seen it, do cover up now (Sunday Times £)
Surely feminism was not for this, says Minette Marin

8. Two conventions, two Americas. Seldom has the divide been greater (Observer)
Witnessing both conferences is to see anger from the Republicans and abiding hope from the Democrats, writes Michael Cohen

9. Owen Paterson has a fight on his hands (Telegraph)
The 'unknown Cabinet minister' is uniquely qualified to lead Defra, says Christopher Booker

10. Patriotism is for reactionaries... nationalism is the way forward (Observer)
Spain has a richer sense of itself than Britain, a country bloated with nostalgia, says Julie Burchill

 

 

Morning Call
Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

As crime moves online, the police need the investment in technology to follow

Technology offers solutions, not just threats.

It’s perhaps inevitable that as the world becomes more digital, so does crime. This week Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions, recognised that online crime is as serious as face-to-face crime. “Hate is hate,” Saunders wrote referring to internet abuse, and the police should protect people from it wherever they are. This will add demand to under-pressure police forces. And it is only the tip of the iceberg. 

Forty-seven per cent of crime involves an online element. Police recorded 30,000 instances of online stalking and harassment last year. People are 20 times more likely to be a victim of fraud than robbery, costing businesses an estimated £144bn a year. On a conservative estimate, 2,500 UK citizens use the anonymous dark web browser, Tor, for illegal purposes such as drug dealing, revenge porn and child sexual exploitation.

The police need new technology to meet demand, a Reform report published today finds. Some progress has been made in recent years. West Midlands Police uses an online portal for people to report incidents. Durham uses evidence-gathering software to collect social media information on suspects, and then instantly compile a report that can be shared with courts. Police have benefited from smartphones to share information, and body-worn cameras, which have reduced complaints against police by 93 per cent.

Yet, Theresa May’s 2016 remarks that police use “technology that lags woefully behind what they use as consumers” still stand. Officers interviewed for Reform’s research implored: “Give us the tools to do our job”.

Online evidence portals should be upgraded to accept CCTV footage. Apps should be developed to allow officers to learn about new digital threats, following the US army’s library of knowledge-sharing apps. Augmented-reality glasses are being used in the Netherlands to help officers identify evidence at digital crime scenes. Officers would save a trip back to the station if they could collect fingerprints on smartphones and statements on body-worn cameras.

New technology requires investment, but forces are reducing the resources put into IT as reserves have dried up. Durham plans to cut spend by 60 per cent between 2015-16 and 2019-20. The government should help fund equipment which can meet demand and return future productivity savings. If the Home Office invested the same as the Department of Health, another department pushing “transformative” technology, it would invest an extra £450m a year. This funding should come from administrative savings delivered through accelerating the Government’s automation agenda, which the think tank Reform has previously calculated would save Whitehall £2.6bn a year.

As crime moves online, police must follow. Saunders is right to point to the importance of meeting it. But technology offers solutions, not just threats. Installing the next generation of equipment will give police the tools to do their jobs, addressing online hate and more. 

Alexander Hitchcock is a senior researcher at reform