The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Why Miliband and Blair can now share a platform

As Blair has moderated his stance on the deficit, Miliband has opened his door.

Ed Miliband with Tony Blair. Photograph: Getty Images.
Tony Blair talks with Ed Miliband during a service to mark the Diamond Jubilee. Photograph: Getty Images.

Those understandably alarmed by the announcement that Tony Blair will return as an "adviser" to Labour will presumably be relieved to learn that his remit is limited to how Britain can maximise its "Olympic legacy". As Labour List's Mark Ferguson writes, "If the party is going to fall out over what Tony Blair thinks we should do with a velodrome, we’re in real trouble…". 

Yet the political symbolism of Ed Miliband's decision to share a platform with the former prime minister at last night's Labour fundraising dinner should not be underestimated. In the early months of Miliband's leadership, when he distanced the party from Blair's stances on Iraq, the economy, tuition fees and civil liberties, the two would never have appeared in such close proximity. Blair's memoir, A Journey, in which he echoed the coalition's stance on deficit reduction, was seen as confirmation of his toxic status.

But Blair has since privately indicated that he agrees with Ed Balls's critique of the government's austerity programme as self-defeating. In his view, the coalition is going "too far, too fast". As a result, Miliband is far more comfortable about appearing in public with Blair. Having already put clear red water between himself and the former prime minister, he is confident that Blair's return will not be seen as evidence of a shift to the right. 

Where Blair and Miliband continue to differ is on the future of capitalism. While Miliband believes the neoliberal model has fundamentally failed, Blair believes it can be revived. As the latter recently told the Evening Standard, "I understand that some people think the financial crisis has altered everything. And the mood is against this. Personally I don't think that's correct." But Blair is not alone in such thinking. While Miliband and Balls are at one on the need to limit austerity, the shadow chancellor is more sceptical of his leader's call for a new economic model.

Beyond this, one other thing is clear: Blair, like the rest of Westminster, has been forced to recognise Miliband as a potential future prime minister. As he said last night:

There is a rulebook in politics that goes something like this: Labour governs. Labour loses. Tories take over. Labour goes crazy. Tories carry on governing.

Time to re-write that script.

Actually it is being re-written by them and by us. They’re on their way down. We’re on our way up.

That Blair can now state with conviction that Labour, not the Tories, will win the next election is evidence of the transformation in Miliband's political fortunes.

13 comments

Goji's picture

Nice article..... interesting.
Goji Goji fructe goji

Silican's picture

Blair being in the pay of a casino bank does not, of course, influence his views on the viability of the status quo.

Keir's picture

Cradle Catholics can perhaps share a platform with Miliband, as they may know no better. But intelligent converts, no. They share the inheritance of Franco, Salazar, Mussolini and yes, Adolf Hitler.

Jimminy-Wicket's picture

Between the two of them they will be a force to be reckoned with!!

hugh markey's picture

As a stand-in for Tony Blair Cameron has been a disaster and in no-way a stand-out in terms of political success. Plus the media messaging his image and ability 24/7.
Blair had two wars to juggle, not to mention a series of domestic catastrophes but did the old magician drop anything? He even made Bush Junior look good.
However, with Clanger Cameron the magic has gone. Every time Cam-do goes into his act the audience winces in anticipation of disaster.
Tony along with Elvis has left the building. The UK voter is left with talentless Dave whose PR is a bit wearing thin.

Tory Target

Mary Jane's picture

Get yourself a very long spoon Ed. Milliband. Leopards do not often change their spots!

Trevellion's picture

Why when someone like Tony Benn; for many the personification of British post war Socialism and the Labour movement, has stated publicly that he believes Blair to be guilty of lying to take Britain into an illegal war that cost the lives of hundreds of British Service personnel and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians would the Labour Party even consider returning Blair to the political fold.
Milliband, should he fail to disassociate himself from Blair immediately, will have effectively made Labour unelectable at the next election.
The British electorate will always remember Blair’s New Labour Government with shame and regret; they left us with a legacy of war, slaughter, recession, greed and corruption.

Pollymolly's picture

Blair gets political rehabilitation, Miliband defuses coup talk. Got to love politicians.

Tricia Jewell's picture

If Tony Blair is allowed ANY role in the renewed Labour party, it will lose many voters who are beginning to return after showing their disgust at the Iraq war. Blair is not and never has been a socialist; many people believe him to be a liar and a war criminal. He has done more damage than good in the Middle East. He is smug, greedy and unrepentant; why on earth would we trust him again?

A Realist's picture

Any association with Tony Blair is a big mistake. It's like inviting Cruella Deville to head the RSPCA. Just as I thought Ed miliband was untarnished and unfased by politicians of spin, this shows he is going to let the exact people that ruined Labour, back in. Alistair Campbell is no doubt somewhere about too.

Nominal Thickness's picture

Just as Labour are been detoxified from Blairite Tory lite NuLabour,up he pops.Is this the same Blair who has been visiting the Bullungdon boy on a regular basis.
Labour is just about to loose thousands of returning voters,who actuall believed Labour were returning to their roots.

Latest tweets