The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Political sketch: Pinning down a squirming survivor

Diamond keeps playing dumb.

Bob Diamond. Photo: Getty Images
Bob Diamond. Photo: Getty Images

Bob Diamond took time off from signing on yesterday to stick as many fingers as possible up to those who had put him on the dole - except he didn’t.

The unacceptable face of capitalism (July 2012 version) had them queueing in the aisles for a seat at the anticipated outing of politicians, regulators and anyone else who played a part in his decision to quit as Barclays chief executive 12 hours after announcing he was staying.

But imagine, if you can, a damp squib in a bucket of water at the bottom of Lake Windermere to get the full idea of the revelations that emerged.

We did learn that Bob loved Barclays, that there had been wrong-doing and he had been “physically sick” when he learned about it - but it was nothing to do with him.

In fact after two and a half hours in front of the Treasury Select Committee you were not even sure if Bob knew where the bad Barclays was, and it was clearly nowhere near the good Barclays he ran.

By then even the MPs had worked out that Bob, hoping for a £20m pay-off to ease his way into unemployment (to add to the £100m apparently already banked in the last six years), thought that omerta was the best way of getting his hands on the loot.

In the best case yet for a judge-led inquiry into the banking scandal, MPs on the committee were generally hopeless at pinning down the squirming survivor.

Chairman Andrew Tyrie tried to make a fist of it with opening questions about who in Whitehall had backed Barclay’s decision to fiddle the inter-bank lending rate but it was clear from the off that the much-trailed naming of the guilty men - or women - was not going to happen.

Why so many thought that Bob was going to come clean when he has ambitions to stay in the business is suprising and despite Tyrie’s open invitation he declined.

This reluctance was judged to be mere shyness by Tory Michael Fallon who, having declared an interest as the deputy chairman of a city firm, then failed to declare an even greater interest as deputy chairman of the Conservative Party.

Shocked by Bob’s failure to dish the dirt, Fallon cut to the chase and asked if former Brown Minister Shriti Vadera had poked her nose into the Libor affair.

In effect, the Brown Government was trying to get you to fiddle the figures, he said desperately to a now Sphinx-like Bob.

Off he went again with a list of miscommunications, misunderstandings, reprehensibles and handful of unfortunates as he adopted the tactic of answering the question not asked.

Did he live in a parallel universe? asked one MP after an hour when you weren’t even certain Bob was in the country, never mind the office, when the fiddling was going on.

The man invited by the Today programme to lecture on ethics did not even blush when he was reminded how he had trotted out similar sentiments when he called for an end to banker-bashing during his last appearance.

The sudden appearance of Leveson inquisitor Robert Jay could only be wished for as the MPs tried and failed to get him to abandon the 5th amendment.

And it took the appearance of the Bassetlaw basher John Mann to get down and dirty about the life and times of Bob Diamond.

Having accused him of being either “grossly negligent" or “grossly incompetent,” the hero of Pastygate demanded Bob hand over any shares and bonuses he was now in line for.

Having had plenty of time to practice this answer on MPs who had earlier inquired more politely, Bob said this was a matter for the board.

And that was that.

Earlier it had been reported that Bob’s daughter had sent the following tweet: “George Osborne and Ed Miliband you can go ahead and HMD.” Check it out on Google. Bet her dad agrees.

5 comments

Goji's picture

Nice article..... interesting.
Goji Goji fructe goji

mbrecker's picture

Where do you start with the endless Diamond "I make _____ million a year. What the hell's YOUR excuse?" soundbites? Non stop arogance. On top of that, much of the business MSM is adding to that. If it wasn't for us bankers, where the hell would the economy be?

For starters, after you'd been nationalized until the debt was written off and everyone who needed to be prosecuted was, in much better shape, thank you. This of course leads to other points:

Who else knew about this, was involved and failed to act?
How many of them have enormous severence packages built into their contracts?
How many are saying, call me whatever the bloody hell you like. Then, pay me what you owe me. Or, you'll hear from my very expensive attorneys. How many bank boards of directors want that embarassment?

Expect more soundbites to fill a really slow news cycle.

Morales Holly's picture

my friend's ex-wife makes $73 hourly on the computer. She has been out of work for nine months but last month her check was $21318 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site Http://lazycash24.com

Mike45's picture

I thought the MPs questioning was very poor. A lot of MPs are just carrerists who have been failed councillors or worked for NGOs etc and are not competent to do this.
Also, the whole poltical class has sacrified us all on the altar of casino capital for years, Tory, Labour the whole lot. So they are in fact no different to Barclays et al.Not to mention lying to promote illegal wars, selling off our services etc. The idea that MPs are somehow more virtuous than Barclays execs is nonsense!

kenelmist's picture

Useless. MPs don't have the skills to get to the truth.

Latest tweets